Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
3% charge from a credit card is high.
really?
i thought cash advance on credit cards was typically more like 5%.
and definitely no less than 2 or 3%.
?

(could be wrong of course-- that's just what i think.. but not sure as i don't do cash advance via CC)
 
I have an interest bearing checking account. Why is that funny?
I do too. I get anywhere from $0.01 to $0.12 in interest, depending on my average balance.

And that's every single month.

That's enough for me to get
An automatic washing machine,
A years supply of gasoline,
Carpeting for the living room,
A vacuum instead of a blasted broom,
Not to mention a forty inch television set!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dj64Mk7
3% charge from a credit card is high.

If you have one of the 3% cards from the old days then the transaction is free.

3% isn't so bad; the reloads in the store generally cost more. If there's a way to cash out that'd be even better.
 
We'll look back at the days in the past, where you could say something like:
"How much discount for cash" and show a wallet full of notes, as you walk away, and the salesman does you a deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dj64Mk7
Really, Apple? Why do we need to verify our identity with a social security number? A social security number is not meant for identification purposes. Let's stop doing this, okay? Thanks

Wrong. They are in fact the only unique form of ID in existence.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/09/13/technology/social-security-number-identification/index.html said:
Social Security numbers were first issued in 1936 -- "for the sole purpose" of tracking the earnings history of workers for benefits, according to the Social Security Administration.

Until 1972, the bottom of the card said: "FOR SOCIAL SECURITY PURPOSES -- NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION."

But Social Security numbers have since become a key method of ID.

"It was the one unique piece of information that would identify every consumer individually," Neal O'Farrell, executive director of the Identity Theft Council, told CNN Tech.

And:

Talk to the banks, not Apple. They are the ones who use your SS# to verify and link direct access to a checking account, which is what this does.

[doublepost=1508061241][/doublepost]Speaking of the news article: I think this is kind of creepy... Now Apple gets a slice of our person-to-person transactions too? (Although seemingly only for credit card transactions). And does this mean it's easy for kids to send parent's credit money to others via chat? I would hope and think there are strong parental controls. I suppose ApplePay Messages is a good feature if you only use a Debit card (since those transfers are free)... but I would personally never use it with their 3% credit card fee.
 
Last edited:
Why should Apple use a separate cash card. Google wallet just uses my existing debit card. It does not hold any cash. Just moves it into an account or out of my account depending on whether I am receiving or sending money. I did not have to give my SSN to google. I have move hundreds of dollars that way.

I’ve not used Google Wallet. What’s the timeframe between when someone initiates a payment TO you, until you can spend the money?

Seconds? Minutes? Hours? Overnight?

With ApplePay Cash transfers should be near instant.
 
I really feel that this particular feature will be a tipping point for many people to finally get into cashless day to day life and understand it’s not that scary.

Are you KIDDING ME!? I keep all my money in CASH that I have wrapped in aluminum-shielded dark plastic bags and embedded inside the walls of my house! Where the guvment can't find it!

Tin_foil_hat_3.png
my bags.png

my walls.jpg


See, I ain't no fool!
 
Last edited:
Why do you believe your SSN would be shared with a third party?

This isn't a big deal. Simply pretend Apple is just another bank. And they're complying with federal law in order to do so.
Are you saying to pretend about stuff when dealing with your finances. Good luck with that.
 
Since my credit union does not participate in Apple Pay. Can I still receive funds from another person who has Apple Pay Cash and use to purchase items as if I had Apple Pay? Not sure what the requirements would be to to acquire Apple Pay Cash card for Wallet.
 
Since my credit union does not participate in Apple Pay. Can I still receive funds from another person who has Apple Pay Cash and use to purchase items as if I had Apple Pay? Not sure what the requirements would be to to acquire Apple Pay Cash card for Wallet.
Yes.

My credit union doesn’t do Apple Pay yet either (“we’re working on it” has been the reply for years!), but I do use my credit cards with it.

They said you can use the cash to pay like normal, you just select it like one can already choose between cards within Apple Pay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scurry007
You must live a very sheltered-life. I can't find a retail shop or restaurant that I go to which does NOT accept Apple Pay.
[doublepost=1507948171][/doublepost]
Your SS Number is greater than four specific-digits...which is what Apple is requiring.

I see you are confusing Apple Pay with regular nfc payments.

Any place that requires you to input your PIN number, zip code or sign after paying with your iPhone does not use Apple Pay, and that is regular nfc payment. True Apple Pay doesn’t require anything after you place your finger on Touch ID and pay at the terminal.
 
I do too. I get anywhere from $0.01 to $0.12 in interest, depending on my average balance.

And that's every single month.

That's enough for me to get
An automatic washing machine,
A years supply of gasoline,
Carpeting for the living room,
A vacuum instead of a blasted broom,
Not to mention a forty inch television set!


I know you are being sarcastic.... but, you all should check out American Express Banking. They offer 1.25% interest. It's one of the highest savings accounts out there.... And no, this is not an add. More like a PSA for those that do have savings accounts....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cartoonkid
I have an interest bearing checking account. Why is that funny?


OK, here's the punchline. Take that $50 that someone was paying you back. The poster was wanting to give up the seamless and secure convenience of personal Apple Pay for him and the person paying him back, and instead thought it would be better to have the person write him a check or get him cash so he could deposit it in his interest bearing checking account and "keep the interest for himself." LOL. If he kept that $50 in a typical interest bearing account for an entire year, he would earn one cent!
 
I really feel that this particular feature will be a tipping point for many people to finally get into cashless day to day life and understand it’s not that scary.
No, not "scary", just lame. Not every merchant is keen on giving up a % of every purchase to payment processors, and not every consumer feels like telegraphing every purchase and movement out into the data stream.
 
As most people don't have Apple phones, what's the point?
No one would invent a physical coin that the minority of people have.

Payment like this needs to work irrespective of the platform.

I understand you're specifically talking about Apple Pay, but the same logic could be applied to iMessage.

Do you feel that Apple should never have bothered to develop iMessage because not everybody has an iDevice?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
As long as they don't use blockchain. its just another overlay on top of an already existing system.
If Ripple would partner here and provide their blockchain, then this is a feature.
Let's see if Ripple will announce this during their conference this week
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.