I don't see what the big deal is. If you really need to hear the song before you buy. Just listen to the complete song on you tube.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Extends iTunes Previews to 90 Seconds Internationally
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)
IMO the spotify app is useless unless you throw down cold hard "recession" cash. too many good free radio apps to discover new music on to pay spotify every month. icloud and iTunes match will make for killer music management.
divinox said:
IMO the spotify app is useless unless you throw down cold hard "recession" cash. too many good free radio apps to discover new music on to pay spotify every month. icloud and iTunes match will make for killer music management.
yea if they dont start some sort of streaming service they are going to lose a lot of sales. as of now you can either have under 10 itunes songs for 10 dollars or use spotify and have almost every song for the same price
I sell music in iTunes
Hiyall,
I sell children's songs in iTunes as The Magic Crayons which are between 1:20 and 3:08 in length.
I've just been and looked at the sample lengths now provided in the US store and its seems a 2:30 track or greater gives a 90 second preview and if its under that its 30 seconds. We don't have any say in which part of the track is made into the preview clip.
Personally, I am happy to now have the extra length preview as I am selling songs to help teach English, so the more of the song that parents and teachers get to hear the better. I will have to wait a month to compare sales figures though.
I have to say I am not a fan of streaming services as I make next to nothing from them. For example, one play on Rhapsody gets me $0.0091 !
That person might of course go on and buy the song, but I can't check that.
Tim
Hiyall,
I sell children's songs in iTunes as The Magic Crayons which are between 1:20 and 3:08 in length.
I've just been and looked at the sample lengths now provided in the US store and its seems a 2:30 track or greater gives a 90 second preview and if its under that its 30 seconds. We don't have any say in which part of the track is made into the preview clip.
Personally, I am happy to now have the extra length preview as I am selling songs to help teach English, so the more of the song that parents and teachers get to hear the better. I will have to wait a month to compare sales figures though.
I have to say I am not a fan of streaming services as I make next to nothing from them. For example, one play on Rhapsody gets me $0.0091 !
That person might of course go on and buy the song, but I can't check that.
Tim
Hmmm, let's see if there's a simple way to explain this to you: a lot of songs on iTunes have been sold with people listening to 30 seconds or less. After all, the iTunes Store is the number one music retailer in the world.
Apple will likely sell even more songs with the 90 second previews. This will probably be more helpful for people who interested in music that isn't the standard Top 40 radio stuff (e.g., classical, jazz).
Maybe they didn't but the record labels wouldn't allow for longer previews. Similarly, Apple never wanted DRM, it was the record companies that initially insisted on it.
In any case, the 30 second previews didn't seem to hamper consumer acceptance of the iTunes Store.
Last edited:
Just what Adele needs, more bloody promotion!
That's cause the albums amazing!
So anybody with half a brain could just capture the audio from every single song instead of buying it? That's completely unreasonable.
When I preview a song, 90 seconds is enough time for me to know whether I can take a chance and buy it. Sometimes a rock band will have a really lousy intro but a great rest of the song, so 90 seconds helps there. And sometimes the band has a regular intro that doesn't give a taste of the rest of the song.
Not everyone agrees. For me, it's not enough. Many classical music songs that I have seen (and just so you know, I like metal too) are very close to ten minutes and for those songs, 30 seconds just isn't enough.
I prefer the same as well and would add that in spite of that, I don't think it's a good idea. You can already hear many whole songs on YouTube.
Right on!
As long as we get a good feel for what the song is like, then I'm cool.
For shorter songs, shorter previews are ok.
For longer songs, longer previews are needed because the songs aren't short and have more stuff. Often with longer songs, the tempo changes... the rhythms vary, and you can't get a good sense of that in a short preview.
I buy a lot of the lesser known tracks from well known artists based on previews quite often.
When I just want a known hit tune, I just listen to 5-10 seconds from the preview and buy it.
But the lesser known tracks I like to have 90 seconds preview to base my purchase on. So I strongly welcome this 90 seconds prelisten initiative
I wish the 90 seconds always started at the beginning of the song. I've purchased two (older) albums this month that were missing the first few seconds from every song. Both times I've gotten refunds, but it's a pain in the butt plus I can't figure out how the songs get ripped wrong like that. For most of the songs, that few seconds missing from the start were at the end of the previous song. But it wasn't true for every song, so even with audio software, I couldn't fix them (and I shouldn't have to in the first place). One album was by CCR and the other by Albert Collins. If I could hear the beginning of the songs, I'd know they were ripped correctly.
Thanks for the suggestion, I have Spotify. It's really a fantastic app for streaming music. I don't have my library on all my computers, so this is a nice substitute for listening to music instead of going to YouTube.
I never denied any of that. I wish you (and the other 12 people who downrated my post) read what I actually posted. I was simply wondering if people actually bought songs after listening to a short preview of it, or if they went on YouTube or some other site (after discovering the song on iTunes) to listen to the rest of the song.
I never denied, mocked, or questioned the benefits of a [longer] song preview.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_4 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8K2 Safari/6533.18.5)
finally!
great, as i like long 8min+ dj remixes the 30s preview where somtimes only some basedrum pumping, and i could not identify a track.
amazon is even worse, they start even earlier in an track as in itunes.
another possibility would be to let the artist/label decide where to start and how long the preview is.
btw now please apple improve another itunes flaw:
if a track has a long name at the end there are always .....
(check out for example voom voom - best friend remixes pt.1 - ep)
sometimes it is not possible to see a difference in a track name, and you have to guess which remix this could be.
it is even the same in ipod on iphone.
always..........
edit: to be specific - problem with long track names in itunes store for iphone
finally!
great, as i like long 8min+ dj remixes the 30s preview where somtimes only some basedrum pumping, and i could not identify a track.
amazon is even worse, they start even earlier in an track as in itunes.
another possibility would be to let the artist/label decide where to start and how long the preview is.
btw now please apple improve another itunes flaw:
if a track has a long name at the end there are always .....
(check out for example voom voom - best friend remixes pt.1 - ep)
sometimes it is not possible to see a difference in a track name, and you have to guess which remix this could be.
it is even the same in ipod on iphone.
always..........
edit: to be specific - problem with long track names in itunes store for iphone