100% agree. But it’s not Apple that operates any part of its business with monopoly power.[…]
When someone operates with monopoly power in providing important goods or services, civilised societies regulate it.
Nothing crazy about it at all.
... that was founded by a Canadian. 🤣And here you are using an American based forum.
Apple doesn't operate any part of it's business with monopoly power? They only allow apps sold on their app store and force competitors to use webkit on iOS devices. If that's not a monopoly then I have a bridge to sell you.100% agree. But it’s not Apple that operates any part of its business with monopoly power.
Where I was guided to from the search results of another great American company, you probably dislike.And here you are using an American based forum.
The U.S. department of justice disagrees.it’s not Apple that operates any part of its business with monopoly power.
Tommy? Timmy?Hoping Tommy can use some of his charm to get this thrown out.
You missed out the right to Foist a geriatric offender onto the world stage as leader. Well done U S A (repeat ad nauseam)!!Of course they do.
Lots of rights. Just different priorities. Fundamentally a governmentsceptic, first-past-the-post and „winners take (and keep) it all“ society, with little regard for balancing the interests shareholders and other stakeholders.
- Rights to bear arms
- Rights for employers to exploit their employees, bust unions and fire anyone anytime
- Rights to legally screw over customers
- Rights to set up surveillance infrastructure
When someone operates with monopoly power in providing important goods or services, civilised societies regulate it.
Nothing crazy about it at all.
They can have an opinion. It’s guilty until proven innocent. Correct?The U.S. department of justice disagrees.
And so do I. Even if the DoJ didn‘t, I would.
We do disagree. On that we agree.We can agree to disagree.
Same person.😉Tommy? Timmy?
Last time I checked, my iOS keyboard includes a 🇹🇼 emoji flag (which I can also describe and find in text). And the settings app has a certain “Region” setting on offer that, I’m informed corresponds to it. Also, just this week, the orange man said that Apple is going to manufacture some chips in the U.S. instead of that region.
Timmy certainly has some Aces up his sleeve to charm China.
If more cracking down on VPN and “domestic terrorist” apps doesn’t suffice.
Android exists and it’s super easy to switch.Apple doesn't operate any part of it's business with monopoly power? They only allow apps sold on their app store and force competitors to use webkit on iOS devices. If that's not a monopoly then I have a bridge to sell you.
What does McDonald's have anything to do with Apple? You're really going off topic with this comparison.Android exists and it’s super easy to switch.
You’re arguing “McDonalds has monopoly power because they won’t sell me a Pepsi with my Big Mac.” While it’s true McDonalds only sells Coke products in its stores, that doesn’t mean they have a monopoly.
It’s an analogy. To try a similar one, McDonald’s doesn’t have a monopoly on hamburgers just because you can’t buy a Whopper in McDonalds. If you’ve decided you’re only eating at McDonald's, then sure from your POV McDonalds has a monopoly, but in reality they don’t because you could just go to another restaurant.What does McDonald's have anything to do with Apple? You're really going off topic with this comparison.
Apple has a monopoly where is no alternative app stores in the US. There is alternative app stores in the EU, Japan and Brazil. Why not allow alternate app stores everywhere?Apple doesn’t have a monopoly in any market they compete in, unless you artificially restrict the market to “devices/software Apple makes”. So the fact that Apple doesn’t allow third party app stores doesn’t mean they have monopoly power; just like the fact that McDonald’s doesn’t allow non-McDonalds sandwiches to be sold in their restaurants doesn’t mean they have a monopoly on hamburgers. Android exists. You don’t have to buy an iPhone.
I didn't say it's bad. Been in the states, lovely people for the most part. And the forum is actually quite funny.And here you are using an American based forum. Shouldn’t you be on the European one since it’s so bad here?
Apple does not have a monopoly in the US, as the 9th district ruled in the Epic case.Apple has a monopoly where is no alternative app stores in the US. There is alternative app stores in the EU, Japan and Brazil. Why not allow alternate app stores everywhere?
You don't need to have a monopoly to fall under antitrust laws in most countries. Abuse of a dominant market position to impose unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading conditions is reason enough to go after a company.Apple doesn’t have a monopoly in any market they compete in, unless you artificially restrict the market to “devices/software Apple makes”. So the fact that Apple doesn’t allow third party app stores doesn’t mean they have monopoly power;
Correct in the west. I don’t know how it works in China; at 19% of the market Apple does not have a dominant market position there by Western standards (well, given the size of the country, they definitely meet the “we invented new ones out of thin air to ensure Apple gets regulated (but don’t apply those numbers to Spotify!)” EU standards).You don't need to have a monopoly to fall under antitrust laws in most countries. Abuse of a dominant market position to impose unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading conditions is reason enough to go after a company.
Interesting how all the attention Apple is getting could lead to a "race to the bottom" dynamic. Soon the only developers paying the full commission will be the ones based in the US.The developers want more than Brazil-style pricing. They argue that allowing third-party app stores in China, as Apple already does in the European Union under the Digital Markets Act, would push its effective commission down to as low as 5%.
They have a monopoly on their product. That is legal last I looked. Save the tired memes for another day.Apple doesn't operate any part of it's business with monopoly power? They only allow apps sold on their app store and force competitors to use webkit on iOS devices. If that's not a monopoly then I have a bridge to sell you.
3How many countries does this make?
That’s exactly what is being said. These regs are bad for all involved. Glad you agree. A race to the bottom for software quality as well.Interesting how all the attention Apple is getting could lead to a "race to the bottom" dynamic.
And they will be the ones with the best software ecosystem.Soon the only developers paying the full commission will be the ones based in the US.