Why does it need a separate app
Here’s hoping Apple finds its game again in 2023!
I personally went the other way, very early Spotify user to Apple Music.Spotify is just so damn good. Even if Apple Music was half the price of Spotify I’d probably still use Spotify.
The only thing I wish it had is Siri & HomePod compatibility.
Apple failed in 2022.
I'm the same, personally I don't care and a lot of people probably won't. The justification for the app though, seems to be that Song / Album / Artist / Year doesn't really work as well for how classical music is indexed and that. Like there could be so many versions by the same artist, or different instruments etc - from what I understand - I'm no expert.I know Apple knows business more than I do, but on the surface a separate app for classical music seems weird. Feels excessive.
I don't understand why an app for a just one genre when classical music is in Apple Music.
That's really it. Apple Music *has* classical music, and can *play* those tracks, but search is so completely malformed and misdirected that you can't find the piece you're looking for.I'm the same, personally I don't care and a lot of people probably won't. The justification for the app though, seems to be that Song / Album / Artist / Year doesn't really work as well for how classical music is indexed and that. Like there could be so many versions by the same artist, or different instruments etc - from what I understand - I'm no expert.
Sure sure, because there’s war somewhere the world should stop any other news of any kind.The people in Ukraine mourn for us not having an Apple Classical Music app.
I don't understand why an app for a just one genre when classical music is in Apple Music.
My distributor refuses to work with Apple when I have a classical release (which is most of my output now). They said Apple makes it really difficult to list classical works with them. Pop recordings are a breeze, however. I was really hoping that Apple Classical was going to fix that problem, but I guess we'll be waiting until some future date to see if it gets straightened out. No other streaming service presents this problem.In short, Apple Music sucks big time for classical music fans.
Why disrespect people with different tastes than those of yours? It’s not for you, fine, just walk by if you have nothing nice to say.What kind of loser is gonna pay for this trash lol
I would add liner notes to this list. About 50% of the entire Primephonic catalog, and nearly 100% of the new releases, included liner notes with each album that discussed not only the works on the album, but the artists as well. I always enjoyed reading them.All Apple needs for good support for classical is to tweak a couple of features in existing Apple music:
- Fix search by composer, key signature (c-minor) and work/opus/catalog (sonata X, symphony Y, quartet Z, BWV, K, etc.)
- Radio plays full works (all movements), not single tracks
Why can’t Apple add those metadata fields to properly represent so-called classical music titles in the existing Apple Music app? Wouldn’t that solve the problem for the most part?The current search on Apple Music is a total failure for classical music. It was meant for Artist-Album-Song concept of non-classical music and as a result it’s often impossible to find a classical music performance by the much more complicated notion of:
Composer
Work
Work revision
Work Composer Catalog
Opus
Number within opus
Work Movement
Work Transcription
Transcriber
Orchestrator
Performer(s)
Soloist
Conductor
Orchestra
Year/Date (of concert)
Release (Remaster)
Label
Venue
Record (CD) on which the work appears
…
I’m certainly missing other fields.