nagromme said:
[...] The Mac Mini looks GREAT though--many upgrades over the old model--and complaints that a low-end machine must be for 3D gamers don't make sense to me. I choose to wait for REAL reports of the GMA950 performance before I whine. Apple claims the new Mini CAN play 3D games and supports hardware-accelerated Core Graphics. Which games? How fast? We'll know soon--but high-end 3D is not the goal of a low-end Mac.
The new Mac mini has indeed a lot of improvements over the previous one. So many in fact, that the price got up by 100$US (but only 70$CAN... go figure). As for the GPU and "3D gaming", nobody is asking for a high-end GPU with 256MB on a Mac mini. However, many people feel that an Intel GPU that shares system memory is a step back from an ATI GPU that has its own dedicated memory.
nagromme said:
I think a lot of complaints stem from Apple not having a MID-range headless, below the PowerMac. So people try to make the Mac Mini into something it's not. I hope Apple adds a mid-range headless sometime, with a higher GPU.
The problem is, aside from the GPU issue, the new Mac mini is
exactly what people are asking for! It has more USB 2.0 ports, 802.11g, Bluetooth 2.0 and even optical audio in/out! We even have a new maximum of 2GB and a Core Duo model that has a dual-layer DVD burner!
Sure, the hard drive is still small and slow, but most people know that 2.5" drives max out at 120GB (which is offered in the BTO options, too!) and 7200RPM drives are even more expensive (2.5" drives being expensive to start with).
That's also the reason why people are dissapointed.... so close, yet so far. We all thought those "low-cost GPU" days were behind us... Seeing how the new iMac has an X1600/128MB and the latest iBook has an ATI Radeon 9550/64MB, we were hoping for something like the X1300/64MB for the Intel Mac mini.
All those great new features for not much of a price increase. It would've been a perfect upgrade if it had not been for that Intel GMA950 with its shared 64MB (how can 64MB of shared memory for the GPU require 80MB of system memory is also something I can't explain).
It can better be explained if you list the features one by one and think about our reactions:
- FrontRow with remote (not surprising, all new Macs have it)
- four USB 2.0 ports (cool, they listened to us!)
- still has FireWire 400 (was sort of required, given miniDV camcorders)
- 802.11g and Bluetooth 2.0 (cool, no extra cost or custom order)
- digital audio in and out (it was only missing an audio in, these features are excellent - beyond expectations)
- available 120GB in BTO options (very nice!)
- Core Duo model (incredible, I would've thought they'd keep that for the iMac only!)
- up to 2GB RAM (it keeps getting better and better! It's the perfect Mac mini!)
- Intel GMA950 with 64MB shared memory (what the...?)
nagromme said:
But what the Mini IS is a very fast and capable consumer system for iLife, Internet, general productivity, and lightweight gaming.
It's yet to be proved for the light gaming (all
I'm asking for is better WoW framerates), but I'll even add that the Core Duo is probably a bit overkill for the target user (movies encoding aside). I'm not complaining about the Core Duo, but it seems weird to offer it, considering their GPU choice...