Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
There are certain people in the Apple fandom who would hoot and clap like trained seals if Apple announced a new policy of tossing every 100th person through the door of an Apple store into an industrial shredder. Some of them would queue up for the privilege of proving their devotion.
great expression, and very creative!

now i know what to engrave on my next ipod touch!

bravo!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DailySlow
Rather interesting that as I checked the App Store for Apple Configurator 2, I was surprised to see that they just released a new version that's only 1 day old, from 2.14 to 2.15, and there are only two notes for it:

v.2.15 1d ago

• Allow skipping the App Store pane in Setup Assistant
• Bug fixes

I bet they encapsulated the BridgeOS update in the new version.

Edit: if you have Apple Configurator 2 installed, you can run "MCU Resource Updater" and that will also update all of its assets to reflect the latest available firmwares.
Yes it is updated
903745AD-E9C9-48C5-96BF-91FF270EE082.jpeg
 
Along those lines, I updated late 2014 Mini to 15.1 and AFTER d/l and install but BEFORE reboot it pops up with ANOTHER update for wired/usb backup connection. Weird and sloppy and far from transparently integrated - half-assed and a bit shoddy in fact.
 
Not everyone can go out and plop down thousands of dollars to replace their Intel Macs. It takes time to replace those Macs. I can't write out the rest of my response to you as it would certainly get deleted by the mods...
I was being sarcastic. Let me add this /s
 
Yes, it SHOULD be all that. But... it never is these days. People who instantly update a new OS release are the type of people that send money to Nigerian prince's so they can release all those funds.

I think you need to stop looking in the mirror while repeating the word smug so smugly.
Are you intentionally being a dumbass?
If there is an update available and I am free, I will be installing it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JayBayAye8
is this really a "bug"?

or is it Apple's polite way of reminding people to upgrade to a Mac with M1 chip?
(a.k.a. time to contribute more money to the "Tim Cook & Apple Executives New 225-foot Yachts Fund")
I take this as a tongue-in-cheek poke at Apple. Because if they DID do it on purpose, people would figure it out PRETTY quick.
Sadly there fix was a replacement of two components and a WIPE of my SSD with laying down the new OS. I'm wondering if I should of waited for this resolution and then go to Apple with my issue, would the outcome have been different?
You should HAVE been taking backups! There's no "of" about it!
Bricked has always meant beyond the user's ability to recover.

Sh*tbricked is beyond the manufacturer's ability to recover.
So what's the difference between a sh*t brickhouse and a brick sh*thouse? ?
This is high school sloppy coding on Apls part. Ridiculous
You don't know if it was sloppy coding. It could be anything from a bug in the chip itself, its firmware, or a bug in the compiler used to translate the code into executable instructions. There's no way to know that for sure from where we sit, and for that reason, we should never be so quick to throw a developer under the bus or off the island.
...I doubt any conspiracy, just the outgrowth of added complexity. The more you try to do, the more likely you'll have unintended-but-rare consequences (and when you sell as many machines as Apple does, even thousands of affected users can constitute "rare")...

...From my perspective, as systems/societies become more complex, conspiracies become less necessary. There's plenty to go wrong without anyone helping it to happen.
This person has it right!
fought a silly battle with lysingur

who fought just as silly a battle with Bandaman
You both need to chill out. Stop being so picky with each other!
This. A process escape such as this should lead to job losses. You cannot forgive such incompetence.
You've never written a line of code in your life, have you?
Yes, but who in their right mind is an early adopter of OS updates these days?
It's not always in our control. My company's Apple devices must be updated within a certain number of days of a new OS being released, or THEY STOP WORKING. So stop blaming customers.
Stop blaming customers.
Oh wait, you said that already!
There are certain people in the Apple fandom who would hoot and clap like trained seals if Apple announced a new policy of tossing every 100th person through the door of an Apple store into an industrial shredder. Some of them would queue up for the privilege of proving their devotion.


The amount of smug victim-blaming that goes on here when Apple screws people over never ceases to gross me out.
There's an equal number of people who hoot and clap like trained seals if something bad happens to Apple. It goes both ways, and it's just as gross, isn't it?
If Apple publicly releases a software update then it should be vetted and ready for the public to install it on day one. If the public takes Apple at its word, installs it, and ends up with a bricked computer then the blame is 100% on Apple. Period. End of story.
We will see how Apple handles this, but it looks so far (if you read the earlier pages in this thread) that there IS indeed a way to fix the bricked machines. So there's your "period. end of story.". ;)
If this had been a beta that would be different, but it wasn’t. Actually, not even a beta should be released that broken.
Crap happens. We should be testing better, but it doesn't always happen. And who knows, maybe it's possible that this has happened to so few machines so far that none of them had the problem during the alpha OR the beta. You just don't know.
Well it says for them to contact Apple. I guess you didnt read the article.
Right!
I use to be one of the first to run out and update when one came out. A few years back Apple released an update that bricked the Watch (can't remember which model). I had already updated and it went smoothly but for me, it was a wake up call.

I wait for at least the first update to a new OS or iOS before updating now. Both my 2020 13" MBP and 2021 14" MBP updated with no issues.
As I said above, can't always be done. A lot of people are corporate users, and they don't get a choice to decline or delay an update.
Now if you really want to see messed up systems - try a PC running Windows (any version). Latest issues involved the print spooler. I work in IT and let me tell you that was major fun!
You've obviously never worked in a corporate server environment or in any kind of role where you might see the list of security or reliability issues and vulnerabilities. EVERY OS has its share of "messed up systems", even Linux and Unix! Windows has largely been reliable for several years now, both desktop and server. But any environment can fail.
Really? They sound like people locked in an abusive relationship making excuses for their abuser.
I could say the same thing to anybody still paying for cable or satellite TV! It's all about perspectives, so let's try not to call people mentally unstable just because they think differently than we do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pianostar9
This is why I don't update my Apple devices on day one anymore.

Apple's quality has become atrocious.

How the heck do they not catch that Intel based computers fail to boot after installing this update?

There was a 6 month long public beta for Monterey - how was this not caught during that?

And then when it's discovered, the OS was released 11 days ago. Apple was just too busy making other broken software to bother fixing the fact that a lot of Macs couldn't boot for nearly two weeks?
Strange…I have a MacBook Pro 2018 that had no issues, but it is on the list. Actually, it is running better than ever (while I wait for my new MacBook Pro)..

If it was a T2 problem, would’nt it be all? There are not different T2 chips from different manufacturers etc. ..Interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rodan52
How the heck do they not catch that Intel based computers fail to boot after installing this update?
Well Apple's statement says, "an issue that could cause some Intel Macs with a T2 chip to fail to boot up after macOS Monterey was installed." So I guess we have to imagine that the ones tested had no problem.

There are always issues with new devices and new software, what we see on these forums is an over representation of users who have a problem. The vast majority do not. Like the class action over the "stage lighting" issue on 2018 MBP's, the sudden cracking screen (which just broke by itself) and the USB hubs and ports not powering issues of some users.

I have installed Monterey on an early 2015 13" MBP which is last on the list of compatible devices. If anyone was going to have problems you would think it should be me, of course I don't have a T2 security chip, but my device actually runs better on Monterey than it did on Big Sur. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
  • Like
Reactions: loby
Well Apple's statement says, "an issue that could cause some Intel Macs with a T2 chip to fail to boot up after macOS Monterey was installed." So I guess we have to imagine that the ones tested had no problem.

There are always issues with new devices and new software, what we see on these forums is an over representation of users who have a problem. The vast majority do not. Like the class action over the "stage lighting" issue on 2018 MBP's, the sudden cracking screen (which just broke by itself) and the USB hubs and ports not powering issues of some users.

I have installed Monterey on an early 2015 13" MBP which is last on the list of compatible devices. If anyone was going to have problems you would think it should be me, of course I don't have a T2 security chip, but my device actually runs better on Monterey than it did on Big Sur. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Ummm…but my MacBook Pro 2018 had usb-c power port issues and they replace the entire logic board. :). I guess I was one of the few…

But, I fully agree with you. I am puzzled why just some have issues. A bad chip batch maybe? This forum tends to be dominated by complainers or those with issues, but that might be the norm on a forum like this (people trying to also figure out why or find a solution from others).

Yes, my MacBook Pro 2018 AND my Mac Pro 2013 run MUCH better now, including reducing heating issues without much or just a little power loss. The Intel Macs are getting updates still to resolve some issues. That is a good thing.
 
2019 MBP 13" with 4 TB ports. My first attempt to update from Big Sur resulted in a black screen for an extended period, after the update had almost completed. I held the power button down then couldn't get it to boot or turn back on, so was worried it had been bricked. Eventually the progress bar returned and it actually restored my Big Sur installation. Then I tried the update a second time and it worked flawlessly (without the extended black screen).
 
How are they going to get the update if they can’t boot their Mac?
Simple. You need a 2nd Mac and Connect a the brocken mac on the USB Port near the Trackpad and the other and on any usb port on the 2nd macbook or mac with usb-c then with a special key combination u start the T2 in DFU mode and Revive the T2 and Flash new Firmware and the Mac Will Work again
 
There's an issue with the 2020 MacBook Air machines overheating and a constant noisy fan.. when are they fixing that?
I can imagine the damage this is doing to the machine. If they don't fix this issue soon .. I hope we get some compensation .. I'm over shutting the machine down every 5 minutes. The flawed Safari update and now this!
 
I used today the internet recovery and reinstalled Monterey. The firmware didn’t change.
 
Crap happens. We should be testing better, but it doesn't always happen. And who knows, maybe it's possible that this has happened to so few machines so far that none of them had the problem during the alpha OR the beta. You just don't know.
Do you even understand the QA process? Anybody who has your first sentence of a response should be dismissed. You generally get one chance to mess up before heads should roll. But these Process escapes (do you understand this term?) are not single events. They’re virtually expected at all times during early macOS point releases. This is a tarnished reputation here and anybody that understands QA cost knows field exposures carry exponential costs compared to actual QA testing via plan, specs and real testing in-house.
 
They said it was a small number, does that mean people who didn’t have the firmware up to date? That is step 1 in an update. If that is not the problem, then how could it be only a small number and not seeming to effect everyone. There are clearly facts missing, but saying the update will be included leads credence to this theory

Better solution, check to see if installation can run before starting. There have also been os file issues before, version checking?
 
There's an issue with the 2020 MacBook Air machines overheating and a constant noisy fan.. when are they fixing that?
I can imagine the damage this is doing to the machine. If they don't fix this issue soon .. I hope we get some compensation .. I'm over shutting the machine down every 5 minutes. The flawed Safari update and now this!
Do you have Applecare?
 
If apple somehow denies the service of those Intel macs claiming user error, then we know for those unfortunate souls, it is time to drain $4000 for a “long overdue” upgrade lol.

I am glad to see that you have so much money you just toss away a device bricked by apple and get a new one.

Human QA team costs a LOT, so does maintaining supported macs for real world testing. It might be so much cheaper for apple to just run through their automatic test suite and let customer be the real tester, similar to what Microsoft is doing for their windows release. We customer are doing test for them for free already.

They probably don’t have any QA tester anymore, instead, we customer are their free QA tester, in the disguise of “public beta” and “developer beta” program. Bet this approach saves Apple a LOT of money.
Strange considering Apple was a billion dollar company when one guy simply compiled Marklar in a couple hours at home, then showed it Bertrand Serlet who then showed it to Steve Jobs.

It’s not like OS X wasn’t complex code then either. The guy who brought up the OS X project on Intel for commercial use didn’t even work at the main campus, he was in New Jersey and he did it from his home.

He posted all the Macs he had in his home to test the various configurations of OS X for Intel on. ‘One guy’ and he did this for years.

Apple is now a trillion dollar company and you are telling me they can’t go down to the inventory, pull out three of each model they are supporting a release on and find some space on that big old campus and setup an actual test lab? Heck, they could hire me to do the testing myself.

What I think is happening is, they simply dropped the ball, too many projects going on and one suffered for the other, in this case Monterrey. Also, the Intel builds seemed to have suffered over the Apple silicon builds. I have wouldn’t be surprised if Intel Macs get dropped by 2023, with the last Intel release going into long term maintenance support.
 
Apple is now a trillion dollar company and you are telling me they can’t go down to the inventory, pull out three of each model they are supporting a release on and find some space on that big old campus and setup an actual test lab? Heck, they could hire me to do the testing myself.
I know that sounds weird from an outsider's perspective but if Microsoft manages to hire all users to beta test their own Windows 10 builds for free, Apple certainly can do the same. Heck, iOS public beta program was introduced back in iOS 8 days iirc, and I jumped the gun on iOS 8.4 back then. macOS public beta followed soon after.

They SHOULD'VE actually tested macOS on their real hardware before shipping it out to customers, but they choose not to. I think one of your guesses seems logical, but Apple would never tell us publicly how they do internal testing anyways unless someone decides to blow it up.
with the last Intel release going into long term maintenance support.
Given how hostile Apple towards Intel stuff these days, starting from ripping random non-critical features from Intel Mac, I highly doubt such "long term maintenance support" would happen. Instead, I would not be surprised if they stop supporting Intel Mac in 2022, making ALL current Intel Macs stuck at Monterey forever. 2023 is fine too.
It’s not like OS X wasn’t complex code then either. The guy who brought up the OS X project on Intel for commercial use didn’t even work at the main campus, he was in New Jersey and he did it from his home.
That's back in 1990 days, where people generally were a bit more careful about what they wrote. It's not like you can distribute thousands of floppies for a bug fix that you just found after sending the program to the manufacturer, unlike today.
 
I know nothing about writing software, let alone an OS that straddles two microprocessor technologies in this day and age, but I know enough about chip manufacturing to accept that not every chip will perform identically in all situations. There only computer I have ever owned that did everything it was expected to do everytime without fail was a Commodore 64.
Swifter, higher, stronger has a price.
I have come to learn that when a .0 release appears on my screen, I come to forums like this to see what the reaction of the user community is.
Backup backup backup.
I trust that Apple will resolve any and all issues in accordance with the licensing agreement that we all accept when we purchase their products. Of course everyone has read and understands their licensing agreement don’t they?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: loby
If apple somehow denies the service of those Intel macs claiming user error, then we know for those unfortunate souls, it is time to drain $4000 for a “long overdue” upgrade lol.

I am glad to see that you have so much money you just toss away a device bricked by apple and get a new one.

Human QA team costs a LOT, so does maintaining supported macs for real world testing. It might be so much cheaper for apple to just run through their automatic test suite and let customer be the real tester, similar to what Microsoft is doing for their windows release. We customer are doing test for them for free already.

They probably don’t have any QA tester anymore, instead, we customer are their free QA tester, in the disguise of “public beta” and “developer beta” program. Bet this approach saves Apple a LOT of money.
Hi man I don’t. Here is a /s

But yah apple is definitely not going to make life easier for intel folks moving forward.

Then in 10-15 years apple will switch over to intels again
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.