Ahh, the wonders of the internets: You get to be anyone you want to be.
You > The rich investor who never errs, so take your stock advice as gospel!
Unless, I've just wrote that I DID INDEED err, holding my full stake through the recession.
The "wise" decision was not to sell to a loss like many did, but I did err nonetheless (and that's what was "painful") by not selling immediately and buy back later to a huge discount.
Ahh, the wonders of the internets.
[doublepost=1485345229][/doublepost]
Which invariably end up being minor variations of one another, and which typically bring in razor thin margins for the companies. At the same time, you further tax your supply chain and lose the economies of scale that come with manufacturing a single product at scale.
Nor does it make sense. What kind of message are you sending if you release 2 iPhones with 2 radically different designs? Either it's the best or it isn't. If you believe that one particular design is the "best" possible, then why aren't you putting all your resources behind that one "best design"?
Isn't it ironic that advice for Apple invariably revolves around telling Apple to stop doing what is working well for it, and to copy what other far less successful companies are doing?
O. K., so it's "feasible" indeed.
I may be old school, but words meaning still has some importance to me.