Other than the couple highest and the lowest of these estimates, they are all so close it's really without distinction.
I don't disagree with your statements, but your math is a bit off. The 99% averages $44,000/annually. That's a million dollars every 22.73 years.Put this into Consideration:
Cook earned last year about 10M in salary. He also received App 45M in bonus in form of stock.
for one year, he has earned an estimated 55M. Lets for giggles (because we all know he's not paying that much tax) say he's actually paying 50% tax on everything. He's taking home 27.5 Million at the end of ONE YEAR.
most of the "99%" will not likely even earn 1 million in their lifetime of work.
SO yes. for his salary, I'd do his job for a year or two and then leave. you can EASILY live off that. In fact, at a certain point you reach a threshold where you have to start actively searching for ways of spending.
Though, I'm not saying he's not worth a lot of money. Look at how he's managed to steer Apple. Its most profitable time ever has been under his leadership. He's a master of supply chain and has definitely (IMHO) earned his position as CEO.
That's okay, still made a pile of money and now that I'm the right age....Apple is going to willingly hand over its market cap crown to Alphabet. Loyal shareholders might as well face the fact that Apple simply doesn't have the aggressiveness to stay ahead of a company that doesn't have close to the wealth Apple has. It really isn't that important anyway. Apple was wealthy the entire year of 2015 with a largest market cap and shareholders never saw any share gains. I don't think Apple can possibly beat Wall Street. The street wants to see Apple lose and they're doing everything in their power to make that happen. Even with good sales numbers Apple's stock value is going to continue to fall. Nothing Apple does is ever good enough for the big investors. They should just take their money out of Apple and go elsewhere and never come back. The only stocks worth owning are the F.A.N.G. stocks. They're the darlings of Wall Street and that's how they'll stay for the next year or two. Apple is a poor investment for the big money players. There's simply not enough growth to be had for the greedy. As long as Apple gives me a decent dividend I'll be satisfied. Share gains aren't likely to happen. Apple has gone from being an 800 lb. gorilla to a 3 lb. organ grinder's monkey. It's almost an embarrassment to own Apple stock now. Apple shareholders have become the biggest jokes on the planet. The tech industry and news media are having a field day with Apple.
Apple is going to willingly hand over its market cap crown to Alphabet. Loyal shareholders might as well face the fact that Apple simply doesn't have the aggressiveness to stay ahead of a company that doesn't have close to the wealth Apple has. It really isn't that important anyway. Apple was wealthy the entire year of 2015 with a largest market cap and shareholders never saw any share gains. I don't think Apple can possibly beat Wall Street. The street wants to see Apple lose and they're doing everything in their power to make that happen. Even with good sales numbers Apple's stock value is going to continue to fall. Nothing Apple does is ever good enough for the big investors. They should just take their money out of Apple and go elsewhere and never come back. The only stocks worth owning are the F.A.N.G. stocks. They're the darlings of Wall Street and that's how they'll stay for the next year or two. Apple is a poor investment for the big money players. There's simply not enough growth to be had for the greedy. As long as Apple gives me a decent dividend I'll be satisfied. Share gains aren't likely to happen. Apple has gone from being an 800 lb. gorilla to a 3 lb. organ grinder's monkey. It's almost an embarrassment to own Apple stock now. Apple shareholders have become the biggest jokes on the planet. The tech industry and news media are having a field day with Apple.
I was more referring to people being driven by passion rather than money...
I understand that. But I was saying what would they (and others) be like if we didn't revolve around money. If they could just create the best thing they can and not have price matter. I know it's outlandish. I'm just dreaming.I have seen nothing to indicate that Apple isn't still driven by passion. If money was all that drove them things would be much different.
If you float your stock to the public as a way of raising money you are beholden to same. I'd rather join 'em than beat 'em.
I don't disagree with your statements, but your math is a bit off. The 99% averages $44,000/annually. That's a million dollars every 22.73 years.
Do you have a specific example of how Apple stock was manipulated, since your post painted a broad stroke?The idea of stock market isn't a bad idea. It's a great way to get cash investment for rapid expansion and growth. it's also a way of offering ownership of your company to general public. And offers the means for suplimentary income from dividends and possible stock sell off in the future.
However, Today's Wallstreet is predominantly controlled by very few, and very very rich individuals who (post IPO) manipulate stock prices depending on their desires and not necessarily true business outcomes. They're also the ones who are generally demanding the constant, record growth every quarter, despite broader aspects. they're the ones leaking these "analyst" predictions in order for the market to change the way they want.
ok okI never did do very well at math
and tried to do that in my head.
Okay I will give you his on stage persona is not the best. He does have passion though. His emails to employees and messages are full of passion. You're right though, Steve had that persona that made Apple what it is. Tim does lack that charisma.
Better supply/chain management to ensure adequate inventory?After reading all of this, I have one question that sticks in my mind; why all the available inventory? My local Best Buys (there are 3) and local Apple Store have significant inventory of just about any model of any Apple device in stock. That's new. In the past there has always been shortfall somewhere in the supply chain.
Did TC just stuff the pipe in an effort to ensure available inventory? Or is there another reason or something else going on?
This new Apple is... new.
No matter what happens I can only guarantee one thing: I will have less equity tomorrow at the close of trading than I did at open.
If you're so sure, then sell short.
No matter what happens I can only guarantee one thing: I will have less equity tomorrow at the close of trading than I did at open.
They are innovating, but they don't have to be all things to all people. But they will have a record quarter, imo.Slowing iPhone sales would be great news - it'll give Apple the kick up the backside they need to actually start innovating again. I had the iPhone, iPhone 3G and 3GS, and then I went to Android for a number of reasons. I recently bought an iPhone 6S and returned it after less than a week.
The iPhone is great, but there's just too much it can't/won't do.
After reading all of this, I have one question that sticks in my mind; why all the available inventory? My local Best Buys (there are 3) and local Apple Store have significant inventory of just about any model of any Apple device in stock. That's new. In the past there has always been shortfall somewhere in the supply chain.
Did TC just stuff the pipe in an effort to ensure available inventory? Or is there another reason or something else going on?
This new Apple is... new.
Better supply/chain management to ensure adequate inventory?
I don't have enough knowledge regarding the entire apple process, but as I said above, the truth is not very far off.That was my first thought however it has never been the way Apple has worked in the past. Then I asked"all products?". Looking at the supply chain, I'm not sure if Apple's suppliers could have pulled this off.
Something doesn't make sense between the sales numbers, the supply chain numbers, and the contractor capacity.
Something is missing.