Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yeah, but what is the alternative? Apple is unlikely to build something better… search engines have a chicken and egg problem. You bet that Apple is feeding searches via Spotlight in to their own engine to build some sort of starting point if they ever jump in as a competitor. It is still a huge gulf to bridge.

An alternative would've been to have Apple more strongly stand behind its "beliefs" instead of favoring a company like Google which has business practices they claim to be opposed to, and continue helping that company maintain or increase its dominance in search.
 
It is that simple. If you come to my website, I’m going to advertise to you across the web. Why? Because it works. It doesn’t hurt you. Nobody needs to know anything else about you. Nobody is taking your card information or forcing you to make any kind of purchase, or anything else. Re-targeting works. It’s not a privacy issue. If you are going to go to websites, then you are agreeing to be advertised to. Apple has demonized it (while actually having some involvement with it), but you are completely unharmed by accurate, relevant ads. Nobody is hunting you down or coming to your house. Publishers are going to do everything they can to monetize their websites. Period. And it is not harmful to you.
The idea that you are "completely unharmed" by companies building profiles on you is obviously wrong. It leads to stuff like this:
 
If it's not a bribe, then what do you call it when Alphabet/Google pays Apple to not develop their own search engine that would compete with Google?

That “article” is full of hyperbole. No amount of money from MS to Apple will instantly change the fact that Bing is a loser compared to Google for search.

And this isn’t a market that Apple has to enter either. Why should it?
 
Bing could have the default search on Apple. But Microsoft is too cheap to pay. Besides bing sucks
 
🤣

Now we know how much it costs Google to buy Apple and to allow Alphabet to data mine Apple users.

There is nothing different from going to google.com and doing the search yourself.

Google can't get anymore info than what you send through HTTP requests.
 
If it's not a bribe, then what do you call it when Alphabet/Google pays Apple to not develop their own search engine that would compete with Google?


Unless the contract forbids Apple to build a search engine it's just a contract about revenue sharing.

Bribery implies that Google is paying Apple do something illegal which isn't the case here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WarmWinterHat
So we can all agree now that Apple's privacy stance is just pure marketing?

No, because sending search queries to Google isn't a privacy problem. It's the same as going to google.com manually.
It's something the user does voluntarily.
 
Buying an ad in a newspaper is not remotely the same thing as this.

This payment by Google to Apple is so Apple doesn't develop their own competing search engine.

That's not a bribe and it's not illegal per se. The contract doesn't forbid Apple making a search engine at all.

BTW, do you really want Apple to make a search engine!?
 
If the numbers are to be trusted this basically pure profit deal accounts for a whopping 20% of apples income.

[...] I’m not sure how Apple could end this google deal voluntarily without getting sued into oblivion by shareholders [...]
I'm actually surprised a payment of this magnitude doesn't have to be specifically identified on Apple's financial reports. The issue here is known as Customer Concentration risk - if there are individual "customers" that can swing the company's revenue by a big %, there is a substantial risk if they stop buying, go bankrupt, etc and that huge income stream goes away.

This kind of deal has apparently been exposing shareholders to a risk for quite some time, but they couldn't have known it. Endling this deal (voluntarily or involuntarily) could indeed cause a lot of consequences in the market.
 
It's not a bribe, but it's a business deal against the interest of consumers.

Now, companies don't need to do the interest of consumers, but this is in the context of an anti-trust case and the deal definitely helps Google in cementing its search engine market dominance.

If this deal has stopped Apple from making their own search engine, it's good for consumers.
 
Doesn’t sound GDPR compliant!

It certainly is.

GDPR is concerned about personal information which can be tied to specific physical persons.

Counting how many search request hitting Google servers isn't any such things.
 
Apple still criticized Google's business practices while at the same time benefiting financially from those business practices.

This is not a privacy issue.

When you search on an iPhone it sends HTTP requests to Google with the search term. It's the same as you going to Google.com in Safari and entering a search term manually.
 
Apple basically sells YOU, the customers, to Google. So Apple customers suddenly became the product. That opens a clear conflict of interest for Apple. Will they really work hard to block ads, if Google pays them a bribe for showing those ads?

They are not selling you. They're sending HTTP requests to google.com with your search term. Just a standard HTTP request.

It's the same which happens when you go into Safari, visit google.com and search manually.
 
Now the cat's out of the bag, Timothy Cook!

There is a reason why Apple took down all the big iPhone Privacy Ads from buildings just a few days after this all started to throw up.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Naraxus
Having a high revenue share is not "corruption." This is Google paying Apple to stay out of the search market.

If this upsets you, wait until you find out how high the markup is on retail clothing...

What do retail clothing markups have to do with nationwide market manipulation
 
What’s the quid pro quo for Apple, what does it get in return, in your view?

It's a business contract which contains revenue sharing in exchange for a service. Common in many businesses.
So, in a sense, Apple is basically selling their customers’ data and privacy to Google.
No, they aren't selling any data.

Do you know what happens when you search using a search engine?
 
Last edited:
This is not a privacy issue.

When you search on an iPhone it sends HTTP requests to Google with the search term. It's the same as you going to Google.com in Safari and entering a search term manually.

The point is that Google generates revenue from searches through business practices Apple openly criticizes as compromising of the user's privacy, but on the other side Apple is willing to drive searches to Google in exchange of a share of said revenue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skyscraperfan
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.