You know there's two types of Apple users, some people buy an Apple product because it suits their needs. Some buy anything with the Apple sticker on it, go figure.
The wealthiest of entertainers are give expensive things for free while the common stockholders (owners of the company) get nothing unless they sell their shares. Something is really twisted about that v
As far as I know there are no rules saying that you're not allowed to have an opinion, maybe it's different with Apple products.Not sure I get your point.
My point was that if you're not interested in something why take the time to make a post....that to me just seems odd.
Hmm, Honda Civic Si or Apple Watch.... decisions decisions.
Hmm, Honda Civic Si or Apple Watch.... decisions decisions.
Hideous. It looks like brass.
As far as I know there are no rules saying that you're not allowed to have an opinion, maybe it's different with Apple products.
No, it's good business sense. No one gives a flying flip what watches you and I wear but for whatever reason needs to own what their favorite celebrity has. People who care about keeping up with fashion and trends look to trendsetters for what is current and happening. THAT'S why Apple makes sure that the biggest trendsetters have the watch. I find it hard to believe a Kardashian (including Kanye) hasn't been seen with a watch yet. Unless Apple has determined that they have become so hated that they don't want to associate, which is an idea I endorse. They chose celebrities that by and large are still considered "cool". Karl probably got his because he's a legacy Apple supporter. I'm sure if Colbert was still on tv we would see him wearing one (I still think he has one now but isn't in the news so much for us to know).
The way he dresses has nothing to do with his job as a fashion designer. You might think that way but it isn't true. He designs for women's. He makes women beautiful. If you see the details of the dresses he sent down the runway, you will know why he's one of the most powerful fashion designers in the world.
The people in this forum needs to stop judging. Some of you sound like a housewife who has nothing to do but to bash people for no valid reason whatsoever. And what for? To see yourself worth a little more in your head?![]()
I guess I'll never understand the fashion world. Seems like a huge waste of money and time. I mean the guy makes dresses that cost what?... tens of thousands of dollars? For what? Clothes? Really?
I guess I'll never understand the fashion world. Seems like a huge waste of money and time. I mean the guy makes dresses that cost what?... tens of thousands of dollars? For what? Clothes? Really?
Ugh.
Apple should be viewed as a company that is trying to manipulate loyal customers for the purpose of more profit.
Thank you Chrjy, I'm humbled that you would take the time to read my posts, now I feel ashamed that I didn't take the time to read yours.What are you talking about? You've missed the point entirely. I never suggested no one should have an opinion and each to their own but why post on a topic that you have no interest in?
There is plenty of news on MacRumors that I have no interest in but never feel the need to post on those topics as strange as that might seem.
**EDIT**
I see where you're at, I've just read all your other posts....surely you must have better things to do!
I think Tim has a crush on somebody...
But seriously, good for advertising I guess.
An ugly wrist, a tacky watch, and a ridiculous glove.
but Apple gifted designer Karl Lagerfeld with something even more special -- a custom gold Apple Watch with a gold Link Bracelet.
Just like they can't really understand much of the techie world building computers, swapping components, tweaking drivers, writing scripts, etc.
At least the $7000 band can still be used when Apple Watch 2 comes out. Pity it's going to be all scratched up by the zipper on that glove.
I think I want a mithril one. Apple hold the mithril patent don't they?