While the actual reduction is 5%, “plummeting” is a great word for article titles that want lots of clicks.Plummeting is never a good word when it comes to mac sales.
While the actual reduction is 5%, “plummeting” is a great word for article titles that want lots of clicks.Plummeting is never a good word when it comes to mac sales.
For those who need full Windows, the next computer purchase may be “must” (Windows PC) vs. “want” (Mac).
I happen to be in the good position to choose “both” but not everyone can. The end of bootcamp may force the move back to PC for some. Windows ARM is OK but some need full Windows compatibility. Their next purchase may already be decided for them.
The upgrade from M1 Pro / Max to M2 Pro / Max probably delivered more performance / feature gains than we got from the last few generations of Intel CPUs in Macs before.It's not realistic to expect that, but the irrealistic expectation was from Apple first, not the user. Apple expected better sales but didn't deliver upgrades compelling enough to drive them.
Being still primarily on Intel Macs has been convenient for that recently. Seems like virtualization options and emulation for Apple Silicon is getting better, slowly.I'm one of those holdouts still using an Intel iMac due to my needs of Intel-based OS virtualization. I'm going out on a limb here, but I really think switching to Apple Silicon was a mistake.
I have a 5 year old NUC for my security cameras, scanning (ABBYY Finereader), and whatever else I need in a pinch. It hangs on the wall and does its thing until the fan dies and I replace it. But my main computer is definitely my Mac Mini. Love the thing. So having the NUC is definitely a decent option for not a ton of money (mine was about $900 but that is because I got a 500gb fast SSD and 32gb memory years ago).Maybe. As someone who does mostly .NET-based software development, 1) a lot more can be done in macOS itself now that .NET Core/5/6/7 and tooling such as VS Code are a thing, and 2) most workflows in Visual Studio for Windows now work fairly well on ARM64. Plus, you can always buy a NUC, put Remote Desktop Services on it, and have several people share that as an environment for the few remaining things that work better in x64.
But yes, Intel-specific use cases do exist. I just don't think that's a very big slice of people.
because the new MacBook Pro was a terrible update and not worth it; apple stop with the minor updates year after year
There is no expectation that someone who bought an M1 Mac would automatically upgrade to an M2 Mac. Most people would keep their Mac for 3-5 years and then upgrade. The ones who would buy a new Mac now are the ones with older Intel Macs who are ready to upgrade.I use an M1 Max MBPro and it is more than enough for now for serious audio work. Never considered an M2. I guess a lot of users are in the same position.And for casual browser users M1 Air is more than enough.
"Plummeting" was not a word used by Apple to describe the contraction of demand. It was used by a third party out of Korea.Plummeting is never a good word when it comes to mac sales.
You seem to be in the minority on that. Only a small percentage of people run OS virtualization or bootcamp. Even among developers, that is a minority.I'm one of those holdouts still using an Intel iMac due to my needs of Intel-based OS virtualization. I'm going out on a limb here, but I really think switching to Apple Silicon was a mistake.
That’s not at all how they are put together. The M2 Pro is not 2 M2’s, nor is the M2 Max, 2 M2 Pro’s. Where did you get this ridiculous idea? The only M series chip that has done that to date is the M1 Ultra, which is essentially 2 M1 Max chips. The others do not follow that same cadence at all.Right. Since an M2 Pro is just 2 M2s together basically. Just like the Max is 2 M2 Pros. Can't start with the high end chip.
There is no concrete technical reason for anyone to upgrade from the M1P/M to the M2P/M, those 20% increase are unrealistic.Is this not merely a case of exceptional sales of the M1, following the debacle that was the touchbar Intel laptops — coupled with the M1 iteration being so good, that fewer see the need to upgrade to the M2 versions?
Personally, it will be a long time before I find a need to upgrade my 14” M1 MBP. Surely my situation is not unique?
You don’t have to buy every new generation that they release… I bought an M2 Max MacBook Pro to upgrade from my mid 2012 MacBook Pro. I won’t be buying an M3 or M4 either when they launch, but others who are due for an upgrade may still want that bump.M1 was extremely successful. Anyone who wanted Apple Silicon pretty much bought it already. That means most people won’t upgrade until M3 or M4. IMO, Apple went to M2 too quickly. They should be on an almost 4 year cycle of releasing new processors rather than releasing every 2 years. People don’t upgrade computers like they do phones.
Likely true, now people with AS Macs can make use of VMware to install Windows 11 on Arm Insider Preview (64 bit) or make use if some Wine adaption as a couple of example. Then someone could probably use crosstalk that is setup as a compatibility layer also even if it is game centric.You seem to be in the minority on that. Only a small percentage of people run OS virtualization or bootcamp. Even among developers, that is a minority.