Wait, are you talking about Apple or BMW?I was never totally sold on the 6 series design as much as the 5, ...
If they did, it would probably be for cost savings. If they’re going for power-effiencienty, I think they’d only use ARM CPUs in MacBooks. But they would probably have to give software developers a lot of notice so they would have time to recompile their software for the ARM CPU architecture.Makes me wonder if they're going to put an A10 chip in low end Mac Minis and iMacs.
Or maybe it's just what they're calling the tech in the A10 that "fuses" two separate images into one Super Image™ !
"A10 fusion" - maybe an indication of a file system for iOS?
Makes me wonder if they're going to put an A10 chip in low end Mac Minis and iMacs.
If they did, it would probably be for cost savings. If they’re going for power-effiencienty, I think they’d only use ARM CPUs in MacBooks. But they would probably have to give software developers a lot of notice so they would have time to recompile their software for the ARM CPU architecture.
A10 Fusion: like A9+M9, but faster/better and in 1 chip!
A10 Fusion could possibly mean big.LITTLE processor architecture?
True storage? As in the OS resides on its own partition? Meaning a 256GB iphone will actually come with 256GB?
That could be very useful - A10 for iOS and Core or i5/7 for OS X with fast switching. You'd need a touchscreen or some very intuitive interface to make it work optimally.A10 + Intel for MacBooks? Intel is now licensed for ARM production.