Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
#humblebrag

I’m trading in my M1 MBP 16/512 for $445 credit!

They used my registered device to auto-enter the trade-in info, however, they mislabeled the machine as 1TB even though they have correct S/N, so I’m getting $100 more.

Just to check, I manually entered the info, answering questions like year, storage, and condition, and it calculated only $345 for my model.

Reminds me of getting the Community Chest card “Bank Error in Your Favor. Collect $100.”
They will probably catch the discrepancy once they get the laptop, so they may not honor the $445 offer. Safe bet is to use your manually inputted information
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2Xtreme21
I know they dont' want to kill mb pro sales, but this laptop with 120hz, sd card slot, and the same ports as a 14" MBP would be the perfect laptop. As a IT Admin, I don't need the horsepower beyond maybe a Windows VM, so that would be my dream laptop...but I want the ports, high refresh rate, and sd card slot, so my M1 Pro 14" keeps on rocking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
Still remember the ridiculous excuses some people here made on behalf of Apple.

“Nobody uses dual external monitors these days.”

“It’s professional feature, you should pay an extra $1,000 for MacBook Pro.”

“Even though Intel Celeron and Chromebooks have supported dual monitors for a decade, Apple knows their customers better!”

Yeah, I mean how much compute power does it take to run office productivity apps - those apps greatly benefit from multiple displays, and up until today the MacBook Air was less than ideal. Thankfully it doesn't seem to be an issue anymore.
 
I would argue that the target market for the Macbook Air does not likely need to be using three displays at a time. If they need that kind of screen real estate, they likely would be using a Macbook Pro anyways.
People who need computing power in their local machines are not the "top of the bragging chain". If Apple were selling a 12" mac with an Axx Pro chip, I'd go for it, still would need as many display real estate as possible.
 
I know they dont' want to kill mb pro sales, but this laptop with 120hz, sd card slot, and the same ports as a 14" MBP would be the perfect laptop. As a IT Admin, I don't need the horsepower beyond maybe a Windows VM, so that would be my dream laptop...but I want the ports, high refresh rate, and sd card slot, so my M1 Pro 14" keeps on rocking.

Get the standard M4 MacBook Pro. The $1599 sku.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jent
This is a significant quality-of-life improvement for the
…very few Air users that…
Apple silicon MacBook Air models already worked with multiple external displays with the use of DisplayLink adapters, but many casual customers
…would never have spent any thought about using two external display - plus (!) the book’s internal one.
Not sure why there’s this myth on this forum that only guys wearing a suit use dual monitors
Experience. From selling and supporting Macs.

Very few “normal people”, let alone potential Air customers, would use more than one external display. Except, maybe, a few enthusiasts frequenting forums like this. Don’t get me wrong, I am counting counting myself among the latter and applaud Apple to have done it.

Enterprise deployments - yes, some. Not a big target demographic for macOS anyways.

A much bigger “quality of life improvement” would be another USB-C port on the right side.
Or HDMI.
Or a standard USB-A port (gasp!).


Again, it’s great that Apple finally brought support to the Air. But…

👉 As much as this gets touted as overcoming the biggest limitation, Apple should be chastised for resorting to the bargain bin for chips and not adopting Apple Intelligence for their entire 2025 iPad line.
I don’t remember reading about that “biggest limitation” of the new iPads.
 
Last edited:
Glad Apple silicon finally caught up with chromebooks in the clearance section.

This would actually give me a reason to upgrade my M2 but I have zero interest in spending money right now.
 
Anyone got some good non-Apple monitor recommendations? The LG model I have connected to my Mac needs a USB to HDMI dongle which isn't ideal. Are there any Thunderbolt 4/USB-C direct connection monitors out there that don't cost $1500?
 
If you want multiple screens and you don’t need major power, you are likely best off getting a Mac Mini for a desktop with multiple displays and either a MacBook Air or iPad Air/Pro for portability. The Mini solves needing a dock, connects to everything and is a good workhorse. Anything you need a laptop for you can have loaded on both with your data synced across devices via iCloud, OneDrive or a backup solution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive
Anyone got some good non-Apple monitor recommendations? The LG model I have connected to my Mac needs a USB to HDMI dongle which isn't ideal. Are there any Thunderbolt 4/USB-C direct connection monitors out there that don't cost $1500?
I’ve got LG’s 5K2K 34” 21:9 monitor. It has 2x HDMI, DisplayPort, and USB-C inputs. I use three and switch between connected machines. It was sub $1k.
 
That's not the biggest limitation. Few users use more than one screen. The biggest limitation is battery life. Period.
 
Still remember the ridiculous excuses some people here made on behalf of Apple.

“Nobody uses dual external monitors these days.”

“It’s professional feature, you should pay an extra $1,000 for MacBook Pro.”

“Even though Intel Celeron and Chromebooks have supported dual monitors for a decade, Apple knows their customers better!”
Same crowd that simps for 60hz and 256 gig base storage on macbooks, bootlickers unite!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.