Legacy finance uses way more energy.
Bitcoiners always have this extremely bad excuse to justify their terrible software.
"Legacy finance", whatever you mean by that, doesn't use more energy per transaction.
This is what you are supposed to be measure. Energy per transaction. Bitcoin is the most wasteful method ever created. It's just a stupid system for crooks who wanted to do crooked things online and didn't care if it doesn't scale or how it worked.
There are also tons of hidden cost in bitcoin transactions that they do not count. Mining farms are enormous and have their own costs, they dump excess heat into nearby rivers damaging wildlife. All for what? 6 or 7 transactions per second that have almost no meaningful benefit to the economy?
So do Christmas lights... and clothes dryers... and other things that are far less important than financial freedom.
Christmas lights attract tourism. Clothes dryers dry your clothes. These things are useful.
Bitcoin attracts scammers and criminals. It's useful for them only.
21m max supply; no out of control printing/inflation.
Bitcoiners always show their ignorance of economics. Central banks are supposed to be able to inflate or deflate the money supply in response to economic activity. They are supposed to assist with forming economic policy. Without these you have no economy. You will have chaos.
Disinflationary; every 4 years, the issuance gets cut in half... commonly referred to as the halvening.
This is meaningless.
More divisible than any fiat currency; to 8 decimal places.
This is meaningless, but actually internal banking systems can add as many decimal places as they want.
Bitcoin itself had only 2 decimal places in the first year and they were called 'cents'.
Open; anyone can access it.
Borderless; it's international.
So basically good for money laundering and terrorism.
Neutral; it doesn't care who the sender / receiver is.
Public; transparent and fully auditable.
So no good for privacy.
Decentralized; mining participants are global and cannot make changes to the network without consensus.
Pointless and meaningless. National governments have to be able to control economic policy otherwise they will lose out to countries that do.
Permissionless; send a transaction to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Except that you have to sign up to an exchange who take a 3% cut and then you have to pay transactions fees and then the person on the other end has to pay an exchange 3% and in the middle of that the price is very volatile.
Bitcoiner arguments are weak and financially illiterate. It's a badly designed software system for sending numbers around inefficiently. It's not money, it's barely used as a payment system, it's almost all criminal activity and speculation. That's all you have after 15 years.
Ask bitcoiners this one simple question:
Why do you always attack the US dollar? China invented the concept of money and quantitive easing as we know it. The rest of the world is using their concepts.
Let's see bitcoiners say all these things about the yuan.
They won't, because they won't attack or criticise them.