Yeah, that's the whole point. 99% of people use their phone camera for nothing higher resolution than Instagram. Are you mounting museum grade prints from your phone? I don't get what you want here.
So you’re telling me that 1% of iPhone owners are professional iPhone photographers working for National Geographic and Getty Images? Apple sells around 230 million iPhones per year. To be conservative, let’s assume these pros upgrade yearly. So you’re telling me that there are 2,300,000 professional photographers shooting with iPhone for major publications? No. I was being generous with 99%. It’s more like 99.99% of users are only posting to social media. The bureau of labor statistics in the U.S. lists 49,320 professional photographers in the U.S. I’d argue that we have a higher total than most developing countries, but let’s stick with the high end and extrapolate that to the world. Rounding up, that’s 1,150,000 professional photographers in the world. That is half the number that you claim use the iPhone professionally. The math doesn’t add up, and it makes even less sense when you factor in that the majority of pros use dSLRs and mirrorless cameras. You’re not as important as you think you are. Also professional photography is a dying field and the numbers are only going down yearly. It’s why I switched part way through school from photography to design, marketing, and focused on web development. It’s a secondary part of my current job.
Yeah, because you have fully evaluated my body of work? You've seen a couple iPhone snapshots and one macro photo. By saying such a thing tells me that you are no photographer as a professional would never say what you just said to me. A real professional would evaluate their peer's work and provide constructive feedback—both what works and what doesn't—and why specifically. All you said was that the iPhone XS camera looks bad. How exactly is that a reflection on me?
