flyinmac
macrumors 68040
My daughter was babbling to Siri and she translated her words as WTF and replied back saying that was uncalled for lol..
Replies to Siri: "What the F..."
Siri: "I'm calling your Dad"
My daughter was babbling to Siri and she translated her words as WTF and replied back saying that was uncalled for lol..
GREAT IDEA!!! Too bad Siri never understands what I am asking.
"Who has more rushing yards this season, Tom Brady or Matt Ryan?"
Hé Alexa or Viv - can you assist Siri in some structural AI instead of singular per-event, prefab non-intelli fact checking ?Ok Apple, now please make Siri useful for every other sport, entertainment type, genre, topic, data etc in the world.
Haha, loser jets fan.
Hey Siri - Who was accused and found guilty of piping crowd noise into their stadium to give the Falcons and Matt Ryan an advantage?
Siri better know prop bets or bust.
Wrong. The fact Apple added super bowl related commands to Siri shows they are working to improve Siri for everyday use and have a team developing commands that likely will allow for a better user experience in the coming years.The fact that Apple had to add specific capabilities to do these Super Bowl type of related queries simply points out what's wrong with Siri capabilities and why it's so far behind.
-Jeff
Having to add Super Bowl related commands means that Siri was unable to parse and correctly respond to what should be generic requests. I would bet that can only address very specific queries directly tied to that one event. This would be a good test.Wrong. The fact Apple added super bowl related commands to Siri shows they are working to improve Siri for everyday use and have a team developing commands that likely will allow for a better user experience in the coming years.
Wrong. The fact Apple added super bowl related commands to Siri shows they are working to improve Siri for everyday use and have a team developing commands that likely will allow for a better user experience in the coming years.
And even then, it's a safe bet that Siri will still have no idea what you're talking about if what you said doesn't match one of maybe three or four specific sentence structures per command. If I want to do something as simple as adding a work shift to my calendar, I have to say, for example, "schedule work from 12:30 PM to 9 PM on Saturday the 4th". If I don't begin the sentence with the words "schedule work", Siri either won't know what I want her to even do, or won't know what to call the event (even if I give it a name at another point). If I don't specify PM for both times, my shift will be recorded as continuing on until 9 AM the following morning or something equally absurd, despite the context clue of the explicitly stated date. I consider myself lucky that I don't have to spell out which month said date is in. It's still quicker than going through the event-creation GUI in Calendar, but cripes almighty. Similar story for setting a reminder for a particular time — if I don't begin the sentence with the time at which I want to be reminded (before I say "remind me to"), the time invariably becomes part of the reminder's title. Siri may be handy for certain extremely specific things, but she clearly understands what she's being told about as well as a chatbot from the 1990s would.Having to add Super Bowl related commands means that Siri was unable to parse and correctly respond to what should be generic requests. I would bet that can only address very specific queries directly tied to that one event. This would be a good test.
-Jeff
I just watched a commercial that unintentionally makes fun of Siri.If users have to be taught how to interact with Siri, then Siri is a fail in natural language AI.
That was like how you had to write in a special way on the old PalmOS PDAs for handwriting recognition.
If you have to speak in a special way to Siri, people are not going to be impressed.
It's sad that Apple started so far ahead with Siri. The context she was capable of at the time was pretty great. Now she just seems like the slow kid in class that needs special attention. Even that kid can remember a short list of facts drilled into their head. But can that kid draw upon context clues and pull multiple bits of information together using indirect reasoning and analysis? Not without a whole lot of work, and maybe never without a brain transplant.The fact that Apple had to add specific capabilities to do these Super Bowl type of related queries simply points out what's wrong with Siri capabilities and why it's so far behind.
-Jeff
It's sad that Apple started so far ahead with Siri. The context she was capable of at the time was pretty great. Now she just seems like the slow kid in class that needs special attention. Even that kid can remember a short list of facts drilled into their head. But can that kid draw upon context clues and pull multiple bits of information together using indirect reasoning and analysis? Not without a whole lot of work, and maybe never without a brain transplant.
Siri needs this brain transplant. Maybe start fresh with a new AI, a new name, and new branding. To a lot of people I know, even middle-aged people like my boss and some of my coworkers, Siri is just an annoyance that they never use. They need to find a way to make it indispensable—along with a better brand strategy and connected smart home hub type device that manages HomeKit, general AI tasks, AirPlay, and maybe even creates or extends a WiFi network all in one.
Finally, Apple news worthy of the front page for once![]()
That's because it's not Siri or at least it's not tapped into Siri's vast database. It's kind of like asking about the weather in IMDB's search field. You'll never get a coherent response there either.Siri is utterly useless on apple tv , in fact it's so awful it's amusing and arguably one of the best apps on the thing - unintentionally
The bizarre things it finds are utterly mind boggling
Eh. Most people watch the Super Bowl for the ads anyways.That's creative to implement Siri for the Super Bowl. Now if I actually liked either team playing in the Super Bowl.
I think it has gotten a lot more accurate in understanding what I say, as in the input text matches much better, but it still can't understand many questions in the sense of parsing it, especially for many day-to-day questions.Spot on. Compared with the competition, google's solution is so much more responsive and far better at interpreting speech/context. Siri fundamentally has had the same delays, slow infrastructure, horrible recognition since it's been born, very little change if any compared to the competition.