Whoa, if Apple gets into the "Search" business Google could be in trouble.
Except the search results would only bring you Apple products and PG content. NO THANKS
Whoa, if Apple gets into the "Search" business Google could be in trouble.
Well, THAT is an aggressive move, and good on them!
[doublepost=1522792545][/doublepost]
Because in the US as a general rule we're not into indentured servitude anymore. No one should be forced to work for one company for life or have to exit to a new career.
I really don’t think it would surprise me if Apple did build their own search engine, irrespective of the Giannandrea hire. I’d have to think about it some more.Whoa, if Apple gets into the "Search" business Google could be in trouble.
Sure, lots of us have clauses that preclude us from jumping to a competitor -- but they have time limits...mine is a year.Well, THAT is an aggressive move, and good on them!
[doublepost=1522792545][/doublepost]
Because in the US as a general rule we're not into indentured servitude anymore. No one should be forced to work for one company for life or have to exit to a new career.
Every engineer worth her salt will do things differently/better on a subsequent rewrite -- its what we do.Any good engineer will bring along the value of the failures which can be and often is more valuable than the failures.
Going down a failed path burns resources and time.
Having an engineer say, "I tried that and it doesn't work", allows you to move on to different ideas that may bear fruit.
I've been doing this a long time and those non-compete agreements are about as good as the stuff that comes in squares on a roll that you wipe with.
yup, how it works here as well.In the UK, people with company secrets often take "gardening leave" for some months, before moving to a competitor.
They often afford this, as the new company pays them during this period, or they are well paid enough to not have to worry about a few months off work.
Lucky them!
I read the article yesterday that talk about google taking him out of that role. And the way the article spoke about this man I said he would be a great fit with Apple..I’m starting to get excited for 2019 and Siri...just PLEASE don’t make us have to buy new hardware to experience whatever’s coming!
Based on what?Their so-called dedication to privacy is nothing more than smoke and mirrors & feel-good marketing-speak
Finally. Thank god. And he’s reporting directly to Cook. If it isn’t I hope it becomes an SVP position. Deserves that importance.
While I usually have a positive experience with Siri...she could be a lot better. Hoping this takes the virtual assistant to new levels.
How many shares do you own now?There go my data from Apple profiles!
Time to buy more Apple stocks, if Apple's mode goes the Google way.
Not exactly.
Apple, Alphabet and Amazon have a vested interest in NOT selling your data.
The interest in not selling your data comes from selling their own products and services.
Facebook and other social media companies have a business model that includes selling your data.
You are the product.
With Apple, Alphabet and Amazon, they have products and services they want to you to buy.
Selling your data would be but a small drop in the bucket of their overall revenue. They can afford, not to sell your data; at least for now.
There go my data from Apple profiles!
Time to buy more Apple stocks, if Apple's mode goes the Google way.
I see people on twitter saying the board should name this guy CEO. Good grief. He hasn’t even started yet. And how do we know he’d even make a good CEO?
Non-competes? They're illegal in California.Is there no such thing as a „competitors clause“ or something in the US? How do all these people get snatched from their current position to start somewhere new doing the same thing
Is there no such thing as a „competitors clause“ or something in the US? How do all these people get snatched from their current position to start somewhere new doing the same thing
I see people on twitter saying the board should name this guy CEO. Good grief. He hasn’t even started yet. And how do we know he’d even make a good CEO?
Is there no such thing as a „competitors clause“ or something in the US? How do all these people get snatched from their current position to start somewhere new doing the same thing
So you could like work 5 years at Daimler and then move on to VW and be like „at daimler we were working on this and that by doing these things that way“? Crazy to me
California banned them.Is there no such thing as a „competitors clause“ or something in the US? How do all these people get snatched from their current position to start somewhere new doing the same thing
She's got that special sauce that Steve Jobs had.Next CEO is Angela Ahrendts.
Is there no such thing as a „competitors clause“ or something in the US? How do all these people get snatched from their current position to start somewhere new doing the same thing