Interesting, never seen an S III stutter. Certainly not with my own personal experience. Screen is fairly decent(PenTile Matrix is hardly noticeable), and the camera is fairly high quality, but nice try. The 4S is top notch but it boils down to personal preference.
Bring it on.
Enjoy your soulless appliance-making Korean conglomerate.
And how is that any worse than the soulless Chinese factory workers making iPhones?
So will this stop the Samsung hate?
the brains of the iPhone are brought to you by Samsung !!!!
So shut up already - Samsung rocks
A common misconception. Apple only designs SoC. The processor is still designed and manufactured by Samsung.Didn't Apple design it's own chip for the iPhone 5? I'm honestly asking here but I thought they did.
A common misconception. Apple only designs SoC. The processor is still designed and manufactured by Samsung.
Does Apple have OS X running on ARM?
I think so.
Got it!
Just for those keeping score:
Making a phone with rounded corners and "swipre to unlock" etc?????
COMPLETELY UNETHICAL! Do NOT buy a TV from these people.
Having your phones assembled in a sweatshop where the workers are ritually mistreated so you can keep your margins sky-high?
Nothing to see here. How dare you! This is a great company. It isn't even Apple it's the people they pay to build their stuff!!!! Also please put all the items you purchase from said company in your signature.
Though Apple has patents on everything, they only sued Samsung because they stole everything. There's nothing wrong with buying a product based off how their brand makes you feel.
Also, Samsung uses Foxconn! I know... you don't to believe it. It's on Foxconn's wikipedia page. Samsung was also in the news because in addition to using Foxconn, their own factories had underage workers in them. So not just third party suppliers being unethical, but their own factories with unsavory practices. But you wouldn't want the truth at all...
So... they aren't really that rare, just the called rare because mining with conventional methods only make a few mines commercially viable.
Seems like a silly reason to let one reason have a strangle hold on the chip production business.
Looks like SIII "sluggishness" is not uncommon...maybe they need to send this "Samsung" guy back lol
http://androidforums.com/samsung-galaxy-s3/587039-galaxy-s3-sluggish.html
http://forums.androidcentral.com/samsung-galaxy-s-iii/195359-help-s3-slow-sluggish.html#post2020747
I don't think it is Samsung hate or just hate on their phones. Samsung makes a few more parts for the iPhone if I am not mistaking.
<snip>
...the press doesn't seem to remember that Apple even builds Macs any more.
(Sometimes I wonder whether Apple itself remembers that.)
/nostalgia
Ok,but X86 or Arms?
Or Maybe Hybrid ones?
Then why not to buy AMD entirely?!..
Maybe because they're..gadget makers..
not yet Mac makers..anymore.
For now please Apple give us some new Imacs,
i promise ,i will buy one of you Arm Parade
next decade.
Looks like you haven't read the full story. It is not a silly reason. It is a major factor why most electronic gadgets are made it China.
http://www.theverge.com/2012/3/14/2869304/us-eu-japan-china-rare-earth-metal-trade-complaint-wto
They shouldn't let children under the age of 6 to post on this site.
Soon the MBP, MBA and iMac will be sporting AMD like processors. And kiss the Mac Pro goodbye. But at least Apple will be getting rid of Samsung, and that is what is truly important to the consumer.
I read the story. Not being able to mine minerals with conventional methods doesn't mean that new or unconventional methods cannot be developed.
He'll move to Cupertino.
It seems most people don't actually know what parts Apple uses in the iPhone from Samsung. People think it's tons of stuff, when it's really very little.
1) NAND. Samsung is one of many suppliers of NAND. Others I've seen include Toshiba and Hynix.
2) SoC fabrication. Samsung does the manufacturing of Apple's SoC designs.
3) DRAM. Alongside Elpida, Samsung makes DRAM.
That's basically it. NAND and DRAM are all commodity items. These two parts can be obtained from numerous other companies.
The SoC fabrication is the only one with significant investment because chips are designed to work with a fabrication process. The last usage of a Samsung-designed SoC in an iOS device was the iPhone 3GS.
LCDs are LG & Sharp, I believe. I can't recall a single sighting of a Samsung LCD in an iPhone since the original iPhone 4.
Yea, that's the problem. It seems that Apple have become intoxicated with the incredible success of the iPhone and iPad (according to company sources, both were surprises to them).
As the overwhelming majority of the company's revenues it is not surprising. If the company does not devote sufficient resources to the computer side of the house it may stagnate and decline. If Apple keeps showing less interest in developing the computer lineup a time may come, and soon, where it would make business sense to either make it a separate division where its resources can't be raided all the time or, perhaps, to spin it off which would be an interesting, but high risk move.
Apple have shown even less interest in the business market. The problem there is even more acute in terms of the hardware not being what the customers want, although they would like access to the OS. Gee, maybe there is a business opportunity for a company devoted to an OS...like, uh, oh, you get it. (Snicker) Seriously, there is money to be made from the OS.
I doubt Apple will change they way they do business about computers though. For a company that talks so much about innovation, they are following a well worn path for those products, but can you imagine the commotion opening up the OS would cause? It would be epic.