Pay the bill. Quit the appeal nonsense.
You know what you did Apple.
You know what you did Apple.
Last edited:
Masimo's patent related to the Apple Watch is set to expire in August 2028. At this point Miasimo is just a patent troll milking every dollar they can while the getting is good… 😉
hope you enjoy paying for Apple's bills in the future.Pay the bill.
hope you enjoy paying for Apple's bills in the future.
Well, if that is true, then weren't Massimo asking for 5 to 10 times FRAND norms and this judgement just gets Apple the normal FRAND pricing they should have wanted/expected?Indeed. While I have heard unsubstantiated claims Massimo wanted over $100 per watch, claims based on FRAND patents say this would have been closer to $10-20 per watch.
Evidently this judgement works out to just under $15 per infringing watch.
Slimy company that deserves nothing. They don't care about human health, just profits from old technology and lawsuits.
because Masimo is a patent troll,
even if hte patent expires, apple still has to front up for the period they infringedApple 🍎 doesn’t care about it being cheaper as they have the best Lawyers on earth. The ball is in Apple’s court as they will litigate this until the patent expires in 2028, then Apple 🍎 will be the last one laughing 😆
Patent lawsuits have gotten pretty ridiculous. Many patents today are so overly broad that you practically need a legal team just to make sure you didn’t accidentally invent or use something that someone already claimed.average apple basher: "YEAH! Apple should pay up!"
also average apple basher: "WHY is Apple Watch Series 12 increasing prices now???????? SO GREEDY!!!!"
love it.
They technically are a medical devices company in part at least. The moment they decided to introduce the ECG feature, it was required to be licenced.I don't think Apple really wants to be a medical device company. The cost and hassle of getting medical equipment through regulatory approval would require Apple to significantly reorganize its engineering, quality-assurance, documentation, and compliance practices (or run parallel organization, which would be cost inefficient and cause internal friction). It would also complicate and confuse their brand identity. Though it might be funny to see an ad for the Apple watch that includes 20-seconds of pharmaceutical-company-level disclaimers at the end.
you mentioned you planned to buy an MBA so yeah, that's going towards funding Apple's bills.They make almost nothing I buy anymore honestly, so it's not a massive concern.
lol
So you accept Masimo has an active patent, albeit an expiring one and you still call them a troll? Even 30 seconds of google, or a passing interest in this case will tell you they still actively produce products related that. Being such a blind defender of Apple without even taking a cursory glance at what you're talking about says everything. Apple can afford it, and old mate Cook will still pass the expense on to customers anyway regardless. Rinse and repeat the next time they do it, which they undoubtedly will.Masimo's patent related to the Apple Watch is set to expire in August 2028. At this point Miasimo is just a patent troll milking every dollar they can while the getting is good… 😉
No. Companies like Apple develop their own technology that perform a similar function. The other company alleges violation to assert a monopoly for the space. In this case, Apple’s tech doesn’t violate. If this were 40 years ago, before the US Govt punted patent appraisal to the courts, this case wouldn’t have made it out of review.like seriously, how do companies decide to infringe on other patents? Do they think "yeah let’s copy it no one will notice" ? then pay gojrillions for lawyers and in settlements?
This whole thing might have actually been a play to take over Masimo. At the time they would have picked up the medical tech and Sound United if they had won the suit. Sound United has since been spun off. Imagine Apple getting ahold of the likes of Marantz and Denon for home audio.like seriously, how do companies decide to infringe on other patents? Do they think "yeah lets copy it no one will notice" ? then pay gojrillions for lawyers and in settlements?
The physics of measuring SpO2 and the routines for analysing the output of a SpO2 monitor aren't exactly rocket science, nor are measuring and analysing heart trace parameters. It is fairly straightforward and frankly obvious. A hobbyist could build something comparable I am sure. Honestly I think the US should stop patenting medicines, medical treatments, medical devices and medical algorithms and patent only the way medicines and devices are manufactured. That would drive competition to reduce prices through more efficient production rather than handing companies functional monopolies over medical necessities. Just my two cents.This is one of those few cases where Apple deserves the blame. They stole from a professional medical device company and copied the technology instead of licensing it.
Scammy way to run a company.
You sound like an upset stock holder. This lawsuit is the least of Apple's problems right now.hope you enjoy paying for Apple's bills in the future.
The point was showing Apple complainers self owning themselves. Now I know why you're so against this.You have no point. You came here to defend apple with a bad example and now I'm calling you out. Try again
I own zero Apple stock and own plenty of Apple competitor stock (because AI). Try again.You sound like an upset stock holder. This lawsuit is the least of Apple's problems right now.
Absolute nonsense. The have active products using the technology that they developed. Pretty sure Apple is the one at fault here.
Then why you care about a lawsuit that doesn't impact you? 634 million is a drop in the bucket for Apple!I own zero Apple stock and own plenty of Apple competitor stock (because AI). Try again.
People who are advocating for higher price tags on Apple products negatively affects me as an Apple consumer? Why do you think owning stocks is the only way people are affected by increasing product costs? Ridiculous.Then why you care about a lawsuit that doesn't impact you?