My first guess? Bono.
Could be.
I'm surprised that Apple hasn't started their own foundation or shifted from Product Red to support the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria directly, given the criticism of Product Red.
My first guess? Bono.
I said:
Apple should be giving their support to help kids afflicted with leukemia.You said:
Frankly I am disgusted with your post.I'm in favor of curing kids who got cancer through just being alive. AIDs can be prevented by safe sex and not sharing needles.
If we're comparing numbers, let's expand curing leukemia to curing cancer in general. Such a cure would save tens of millions of lives:
Each year globally, about 14 million people learn they have cancer, and 8 million people die from the disease. Research suggests that one-third of cancer deaths can be prevented, but sometimes services and technologies are not widely available, especially in low- and middle-income countries.Many of the same problems with preventing HIV also apply to preventing deaths from cancer. Why are those people less deserving of Apple's support?
Im disgusted that you think one is worthy, and one isn't..... because you seemingly seem to think that people with AIDS or HIV have brought it on themselves? There's 1.8 million kids out there who may disagree that they could have prevented having AIDS/HIV by practising safe sex or needle sharing.
Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) of all races and ethnicities remain the population most profoundly affected by HIV.Incidents of HIV could be greatly reduced simply by practicing safe sex
I am absolutely disgusted that this is still considered a political issue.
Actually, you're the one with selective comprehension, as what follows will amply illustrate:
What I said is that AIDs can be prevented by safe sex and not sharing needles. The children born with HIV are like crack babies: saddled with the consequences of their parents' bad behavior.
Kids with leukemia, and people with cancer in general, get cancer just by living, so their behavior is generally not what caused their disease.
@sim667 made the issue one of numbers, so I pointed out that cancer is far more prevalent and that many more die of it each year compared with HIV.
And here we come to that selective comprehension problem of yours: I mentioned gays not once. Why did you bring them up? Is it that you associate unsafe sex and needle sharing with gays? That's pretty prejudiced.
He called my post disgusting when all I'd said was that AIDs can be prevented by not indulging in risky behavior, whereas kids with leukemia can't do anything to prevent their disease, and so Apple should support curing leukemia at least.
Limited dollars for research. Cancer hits kids and young people through no fault of their own.
Whereas, according to the CDC:
Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) of all races and ethnicities remain the population most profoundly affected by HIV.Incidents of HIV could be greatly reduced simply by practicing safe sex.
Apple should be giving their support to help kids afflicted with leukemia.
Indeed. My mother got cancer from HPV.As for cancer "just happening", while leukaemia does, there are plenty of cancers such as lung, liver, bowel, colon cervical that can be as a result of lifestyle.
Absolutely incorrect. It is the story that is oxymoronic: "Discoverer" of "HIV", which has never been isolated, states "HIV" is "harmless". The whole "AIDS" narrative is like Swiss cheese.
But why focus on AIDs to the exclusion of other charities? Apple's famous for not having had a charitable foundation while Steve was running things, so what made Tim select AIDs instead of, say, childhood leukemia?
Apple have been releasing (PRODUCT)red iPods since 2006 i.e. when Steve was still in charge.https://www.apple.com/pr/products/ipodhistory/
It has been isolated multiple times.
Popovic M, Sarngadharan MG, Read E, et al. Detection, isolation, and continuous production of cytopathic retroviruses (HTLV-III) from patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS. Science. 1984; 224(4648): 497-500.
Gallo RC, Salahuddin SZ, Popovic M, et al. Frequent detection and isolation of cytopathic retroviruses (HTLV-III) from patients with AIDS and at risk for AIDS. Science. 1984; 224(4648): 500-503.
Schüpbach J, Popovic M, Gilden RV, et al. Serological analysis of a subgroup of human T-lymphotropic retroviruses (HTLV-III) associated with AIDS. Science. 1984; 224(4648): 503-505.
Sarngadharan MG, Popovic M, Bruch L, et al. Antibodies reactive with human T-lymphotropic retroviruses (HTLV-III) in the serum of patients with AIDS. Science. 1984; 224(4648): 506-508.
The HIV genome (and genome of variants) has been described for over a decade. It has been published and is publicly accessible for anyone to use for research."No, I do not think that HIV exists because I have never seen any acceptable scientific proof of its existence, especially in AIDS patients. All the claims to the contrary are opinions based on identification of so-called markers. Moreover, since so-called HIV has never been purified (even according to HIV's original discoverer, Dr. Luc Montagnier), its specific RNA has never been actually identified nor sequenced. 'Viral loads' measured after PCR amplification are therefore not scientifically acceptable as the RNA or DNA they measure is only assumed to be specific genetic components of HIV, but have never been properly identified as such.
So children deserve to pay for their parents mistakes?I said:
Apple should be giving their support to help kids afflicted with leukemia.You said:
Frankly I am disgusted with your post.I'm in favor of curing kids who got cancer through just being alive. AIDs can be prevented by safe sex and not sharing needles.
If we're comparing numbers, let's expand curing leukemia to curing cancer in general. Such a cure would save tens of millions of lives:
Each year globally, about 14 million people learn they have cancer, and 8 million people die from the disease. Research suggests that one-third of cancer deaths can be prevented, but sometimes services and technologies are not widely available, especially in low- and middle-income countries.Many of the same problems with preventing HIV also apply to preventing deaths from cancer. Why are those people less deserving of Apple's support?
The HIV genome (and genome of variants) has been described for over a decade. It has been published and is publicly accessible for anyone to use for research.
http://www.hiv.lanl.gov/content/sequence/HIV/mainpage.html
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004268229899211X
I'd stick to the vague conspiracy theories be try not to stray into objective claims that are easily demonstrated false.
So children deserve to pay for their parents mistakes?
Brilliant.
I love it how you shills play tag team. The cat's out of the bag, and no matter what you do you'll never get it back in.
Shills? So you assume anyone who bothers to refute your claims only do so because they're being paid by Big Pharma to astroturf tech websites?
And the "facts" speak for themselves. The founder of Alive and Well, died of HIV as did her 3 year old daughter she infected. Sadly neither are even remotely alive and well. That that fact alone hasn't given you pause for thought speaks volumes.I've made no claims - only cited factual references
And the "facts" speak for themselves. The founder of Alive and Well, died of HIV as did her 3 year old daughter she infected. Sadly neither are even remotely alive and well. That that fact alone hasn't given you pause for thought speaks volumes.
I still don't think you understand. To reiterate: the creator of the HIV denial website Alive and Well is dead from HIV. The glaring contradiction couldn't be more vivid.I've already addressed this. The tag team strikes again.
I still don't think you understand. To reiterate: the creator of the HIV denial website Alive and Well is dead from HIV. The glaring contradiction couldn't be more vivid.
Perhaps deadandsick.org would be a more appropriate HIV denial domain.
But I'd also accept a charity that helped kids afflicted with diseases they got from their parents.
As previously stated (you really should do your research), I have interviewed both Christine Maggiore (before she was murdered by her doctor and Big Pharma) and Robin Scovill - the producers of "The Other Side of AIDS". So I am very much up to speed with her story. You state that she died of "HIV" - but you have no proof. I remain convinced that she was murdered, and so was her daughter.