If they are in that much debt, Apple isn't going to do anything close to taking control of that mess. They might float them $50M or so, but nothing more.
I agree. That is why I also subscribe to SiriusXM. It has variety, maybe too much.
The article is missing the most important angle here. Yes, it would be beneficial to broadcast Beats 1 on the airwaves to gain a wider audience but the absolute gold strike would be getting all of iHeartRadio’s stations available within AppleMusic. I think the speculators have this one backwards. Integrating 850 local US radio stations and thousands abroad inside of AppleMusic is the real play here.
An ad-free Beats 1 on terrestrial radio? That's gotta run afoul of some anti-trust laws.
Iheartmedia is well known for its right wing leanings. I would seriously reconsider my Apple Music subscription if they were to bail out that cesspool of reactionary lunacy.
Terrestrial radio stations are generally ad-supported or listener-supported. If a new player with tons of money comes into the game and financially backs a completely ad-free service, that puts pressure on existing services, which are already struggling.I'm curious why you would think that?
I would like to see another Beats 1 station. One for each genre. I do like the countdown
Apple has held talks with iHeartMedia to buy a stake in the U.S. radio company, according to a new Financial Times report citing people familiar with the matter.
![]()
iHeartMedia is currently $20 billion in debt, with audiences gradually turning away from radio in favor of digital music services like Spotify, Apple Music, and Pandora. The radio group filed for bankruptcy in March, and has been in contact with several potential investors ahead of a deadline later this month to file a reorganization plan with the bankruptcy court.
iHeartMedia is hoping Apple will take an equity stake worth millions of dollars, according to FT sources, although discussions between the two companies are still in the early stages and no deal has been agreed. Apple declined to comment, while iHeartMedia did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
The report suggests Apple is angling for a deal in order to gain a platform for wider distribution of its Beats 1 radio station and increase awareness of Apple Music:
Despite being billions of dollars in debt, iHeartMedia remains the largest radio broadcaster in the United States, with more than 850 stations operating across the country. One music industry executive who spoke to FT described the potential deal as a "power move" by Apple, as it aims to persuade more artists and labels to strike exclusive or early releases for its streaming service instead of its biggest rival, Spotify.
Apple Music surpassed 50 million subscribers and free trial users earlier this year, giving it a bigger share of listeners in the U.S. than Spotify, although Spotify is still the global leader with more than 80 million paying users around the world. Earlier this year, Apple acquired music recognition app Shazam for $400 million in order to improve Apple Music's listening recommendations.
Article Link: Apple in Talks to Buy Stake in U.S. Radio Group iHeartMedia
If they are in that much debt, Apple isn't going to do anything close to taking control of that mess. They might float them $50M or so, but nothing more.
Wait! $20 billion in debt?
That had to be a typo
Having grown up listening to AM and later FM radio I find myself only listening to NPR (and even stream KQED more than I listen to my local NPR station) since most of the stations that play "classic" rock play the same playlist over and over with more commercials than music. For music it's Pandora or my own collection.
So that brings me to this question:
Does iHeartRadio have any personalities or shows that have a large audience? If so, Apple's move could be a step to brining them to Apple Music in a bid to gain subscribers, much as Sirius did with Howard Stern.
Lol, people expect free and no commercials and expect that model to last.I really like their Mac app. Simple and free and no commercials
What are you trying to say? $50M in stocks?“Float them $50M” LOL Apple farts $50M in stocks in a matter of hours (so what would be their incentive toward iHeart), and Apple is not a corporate Checksmart.
What are you trying to say? $50M in stocks?
All I said was they might throw $50M in if they want some kind of asset from iHeart that suits their objectives. $50M is a rounding error for Apple, but my point was Apple won't touch iHeart in terms of acquiring the company or anything that exposes them to the massive debt.
Apple doesn't make any move that isn't profitable.
iHeart = McRadio McMusic.
It's like the American Cheese of the vast music world, and it's as plastic as American Cheese. Bubble wrap is more interesting.
Personally, I would love to see iHeart sell off everything and their terrestrial stations go "mom and pop", and diversify formats once more ... but I live in this bizarre fantasy because reality is a nightmare.
I really like their Mac app. Simple and free and no commercials
They’re in that much debt because of a leveraged buyout from vulture capitalists.Lol, people expect free and no commercials and expect that model to last.
They are 20 billion in debt.
$50M would actually be 1/400th of $20B, not 1/40....Why exactly would you think Apple would just “float” 1/40 the amount of DEBT to a company, and somehow that will keep it afloat? (1) Apple wouldn’t invest anything unless it yields a decent ROI; (2) if iHeart felt they had something so proprietary that Apple would want it, they themselves would balk at $50M; (3) iHeart is seeking bankruptcy protection because they can’t pay back their CREDITORS, so why would they want to take on another? And (4) if Apple only “floated” $50M to iHeart, and iHeart closes a majority of their 850 stations, of what use then is iHeart to Apple?
I don’t care if you come back with, “well, $100M or $500M then.” IHeart owes money to a hell of a lot of hedge fund managers and venture capitalists, os if Apple can convince iHearts investors to take back their investments and live short on the interest they are charging, a win-win for everyone.
[doublepost=1541097209][/doublepost]
You sounds like a very compassionate person. So let me get this straight. YOU don’t like iHeart offerings. So, because of that, you’d like to see another American company fail, thousands and thousands of people go out of work, nearly a thousand office buildings shuttered which hurts landholders and landlords, and local radio stations that you’ve listened to since Marconi invented the damn radio should go silent. Oh... and the “mom and pop” model would CLEARLY work so EASILY in your world because these “mom and pop” stations (which are just SITTING on a boatload of cash) can compete for contracts from the major record studios to play music and negotiate with sports/news/etc conglomerates for air time, which you don’t pay one friggin’ dime for.
All because some FM station in your town plays too much Taylor Swift for YOUR liking.
Yeah. Makes a lot of sense. ::rollseyes::