Tried a free trial of Apple Music and caught myself opening Spotify more often.
My two university kids do NOT use Apple Music. They use Spotify.This is a service students are forced to pay for? Couldn’t a student use Spotify instead or not subscribe to a music streaming service?
Spotify has the superior recommendation engine.My two university kids do NOT use Apple Music. They use Spotify.
I don't know why but they do.
Everyone contributes to a pool of money. The amount you pay is not allotted to you alone. You subsidize those who use more than you. Otherwise, your fee would probably be much more. And of course, we are subsidizing the students who pay much less. If they were paying their fair share, we would be paying less.Mentioned so far is inflation and also paying artists more. This brings up a question I’ve had for a while:
Say I have a monthly subscription to Music of $10 but I didn’t listen to any music that month. Where does the $10 go? If I do use Music that month, how much do I need to use for that $10 to be worth it? How is that money divided up? Even if I don’t use it?
Why aren’t they increasing prices across the board? Why target only students?Inflation is global. Someone, somewhere has to pay. In this case the people using it are splitting the costs with apple employees and shareholders. It is just like taxes, a person somewhere is paying, it is just a question of which person, except inflation is highly regressive.
#consequences
Maybe because that’s where their profit margin is smallestWhy aren’t they increasing prices across the board? Why target only students?
There are lots of broke people who are not students, yet they have to pay $9.99. Never understood the logic of "student discounts". Students aren't the only ones on fixed incomes (all the while paying tens of thousands to go to school each semester).God forbid their profits go down 0,000000000000000041%
It's better to make the broke student pay for it
Future (valuable) customers. Graduates tend to have higher living standards than non-academic peersThere are lots of broke people who are not students, yet they have to pay $9.99. Never understood the logic of "student discounts". Students aren't the only ones on fixed incomes (all the while paying tens of thousands to go to school each semester).
If that's true, Apple should offer everyone a 4 year, half-price subscription with the promise that we might sign up for the full price product at the end of 4 years.Future (valuable) customers. Graduates tend to have higher living standards than non-academic peers
Now do insurance.Mentioned so far is inflation and also paying artists more. This brings up a question I’ve had for a while:
Say I have a monthly subscription to Music of $10 but I didn’t listen to any music that month. Where does the $10 go? If I do use Music that month, how much do I need to use for that $10 to be worth it? How is that money divided up? Even if I don’t use it?
Mentioned so far is inflation and also paying artists more. This brings up a question I’ve had for a while:
Say I have a monthly subscription to Music of $10 but I didn’t listen to any music that month. Where does the $10 go? If I do use Music that month, how much do I need to use for that $10 to be worth it? How is that money divided up? Even if I don’t use it?
I would like to point out that going from $1.50 to $2.00 is a 33% raise. That is not what I'd consider a "slight increase"!
Yes, it's only 50¢ in absolute terms, but I don't have a good sense of what is standard in these countries.
How is it "quietly" if they sent out emails informing their customers?
OK, but when each track played is worth a fraction of a penny, $10 is a lot and I doubt anyone is playing that much music to use up their full monthly amount that it needs other people’s monthly paymentsEveryone contributes to a pool of money. The amount you pay is not allotted to you alone. You subsidize those who use more than you. Otherwise, your fee would probably be much more. And of course, we are subsidizing the students who pay much less. If they were paying their fair share, we would be paying less.
Perchance do they listen to music on their notebooks / tablets etc?My two university kids do NOT use Apple Music. They use Spotify.
I don't know why but they do.
I understand the concept of insurance, but music streaming is different as I doubt anyone uses their $10 in full that other people’s $10 are needed, considering how little is paid per track playedNow do insurance.
Thank you for your patriotism comrade!We must do all we can as students to help Apple stay afloat financially during these tough times
#studentswithapple