Spotify, YouTube and my local iTunes playlist is enough for me.
I would like to point out that going from $1.50 to $2.00 is a 33% raise. That is not what I'd consider a "slight increase"!
Yes, it's only 50¢ in absolute terms, but I don't have a good sense of what is standard in these countries.
Spotify, YouTube and my local iTunes playlist is enough for me.
Naw, it's more like buying outdated fashion. Eventually, it will be the current fashion.This strategy also means you'll basically never have current music.
HaHa. Storage is needed for any computing anyway. So use a portion of the storage purchased for anything one does with their computer to store relatively small music files in some of the space. Or maybe you mean iDevice storage? If so, as someone preferring to own, I do tend to buy a tier or two higher than baseline storage for synching lots of favorite playlists and some ripped videos when I'll be traveling. But if I was that pinched, I could very easily build lots of playlists on the computer and then sync a few at a time based on my impending plans. With laptops tending to be the "main" computer more and more, it's probably going along with me on any big trip too, so I have all songs and all playlist to adjust what is on my iDevice at any given time too.
Absolute value isn't a fair way to evaluate it. Look at it as a 34% increase.OUTRAGEOUS! 50¢! The audacity!
It’s a 30% increase. It’s like if the iPhone went from $1k to $1,300.50c increase. oh no
won't be long until Apple hikes the price for everyone. If it's only a 50c increase we will be lucky.
I can't tell if you're being serious or this is a joke I just don't get.Naw, it's more like buying outdated fashion. Eventually, it will be the current fashion.
My SO heard Latto's Big Energy recently and was like HUH??? that's Tom Tom Club's Genius of Love. And when we googled it Big Energy is Mariah Carey's Fantasy... which is Tom Tom Club's Genius of Love...
If you were to use Big Energy in a YouTube video you could get three copyright strikes.
So, yeah, save money and get the older versions.
Both. The point is, most of the new music isn't new.I can't tell if you're being serious or this is a joke I just don't get.
OUTRAGEOUS! 50¢! The audacity!
It’s a 30% increase. It’s like if the iPhone went from $1k to $1,300.
More like the iPhone went from$1k to $1,000.50.See..
I strongly disagree. Maybe we just listen to different music.Both. The point is, most of the new music isn't new.
It is a slight decrease in the ridiculously low likely lost leader pricing that at $1.99 is still $8 off the regular 9.99 price. It’s the cost of buying two singles downloads for 50 million songsI would like to point out that going from $1.50 to $2.00 is a 33% raise. That is not what I'd consider a "slight increase"!
Yes, it's only 50¢ in absolute terms, but I don't have a good sense of what is standard in these countries.
Yes, but the amount of storage needed for, say, text files, is a lot different to that needed for a comprehensive music library.
My music collection is roughly 90GB, but I like listening to full albums rather than playlists. I know people with much larger libraries. People approach music differently.My existing accumulated library- about 15K songs- takes up about 388MB. I'd never want the whole thing with me as many albums have fluff I never care to hear again. Based on playlists I've assembled to my own tastes, my repeat listening pool from 15K is down to about 4K songs. They represent the MAX upside I'd generally like to be available at any given time.
The playlists I generally sync to my iDevice take up 126GB. If I needed that to use less space, I could opt to sync fewer lists at any given time (maybe rotate lists if I liked all of them equally)... or I could check one box to sync them as 160kpbs instead of AAC+... or 128kbps to really get the total size down. For all of that, I no longer have any ongoing costs. None of it can be taken away from me at any time by not paying Apple something monthly.
I DO choose to add select singles and a few albums to it each year but this approach has piled up so much that I could basically STOP doing much of that at all and probably never tire of the listening variety I've accumulated. Nevertheless, if I was a person who wanted to keep building- and I am- a smallish budget covers the small range of new songs that I consider long-term "keepers" to add each year.
None of this says renting Music is entirely bad- it has its place- but for those whining about price increases (with only more to definitely follow over the years as it does/will in all rental-driven models)- this is THE Apple-endorsed option for many years that is still fully available to anyone, still fully functional and requires no ongoing monthly fee to serve owned music for up to the rest of anyone's life.
The cost of living in South Africa is 66% lower. In US currency the non-discounted South African price of Apple Music is $3.79.It is a slight decrease in the ridiculously low likely lost leader pricing that at $1.99 is still $8 off the regular 9.99 price. It’s the cost of buying two singles downloads for 50 million songs
My music collection is roughly 90GB, but I like listening to full albums rather than playlists. I know people with much larger libraries. People approach music differently.
For context the non-discounted price is 59,000đ.The price of Apple Music for Student is also increased in Vietnam, from 29.000₫ to 35,000₫, as shown on Apple website in Vietnam market.
![]()
Apple Music
Nghe trực tuyến hàng triệu bài hát trong chế độ Âm Thanh Không Gian với Dolby Atmos. Có thể sử dụng trực tuyến và ngoại tuyến, hoàn toàn không có quảng cáo. Hãy bắt đầu nghe miễn phí ngay.www.apple.com
Umm... what? You know that you don't compare increases with absolute values.More like the iPhone went from$1k to $1,000.50.
Inflation is global ... and yet Apple just set a record-breaking quarter. Give me a break..Inflation is global. Someone, somewhere has to pay. In this case the people using it are splitting the costs with apple employees and shareholders. It is just like taxes, a person somewhere is paying, it is just a question of which person, except inflation is highly regressive.
#consequences
So what is it exactly that you’re complaining about? The fact that consumers are spending their money on Apple products? FYI, it’s not just products consumers are spending their money on, it’s also services that Apple has exceedingly done very well with.Inflation is global ... and yet Apple just set a record-breaking quarter. Give me a break..
Absolute value isn't a fair way to evaluate it. Look at it as a 34% increase.