This is a weird claim. If Apple could have been making 75% more 5s's, they would have done so from day one.
My understanding was all Pegatron assembly was going from 5C to 5S.
100% of Pegatron production was 5C on Day 1.

This is a weird claim. If Apple could have been making 75% more 5s's, they would have done so from day one.
Sadly, this seems to be the likely answer. It's not consumer friendly, if consumers are looking for a lower iPhone entry point. I think we should all accept the fact that apple does not want to keep it's hold on the market share.
Apple seems happy to let it continue to slip away, as long as it sells 5% more phones, year over year. I just hope they are happy when the smart phone market ends up like the PC market of the early/mid 90s.
The iPhone 5C addresses no market so it's not too surprising to see it floundering.
You can't inculcate in everyone that they should only settle for the best-of-the-best phone and then expect people to get the overpriced gimped version. Equally, you can't inculcate in everyone the idea that plastic is cheap and then instantaneously change everyone's mind.
If you're gonna drop hundreds of dollars/pounds on a phone, you might as well go whole cow.
Uh, not unless they're changing the pricing. The term you're looking for is gross profit.
That's kind of a ridiculous way to phrase it unless the implication is that supply/availability is the main driver of demand for one model over the other.
We want a phone, not a computer.
The iPhone 5C addresses no market so it's not too surprising to see it floundering.
You can't inculcate in everyone that they should only settle for the best-of-the-best phone and then expect people to get the overpriced gimped version. Equally, you can't inculcate in everyone the idea that plastic is cheap and then instantaneously change everyone's mind.
If you're gonna drop hundreds of dollars/pounds on a phone, you might as well go whole cow.
A Wi-fi only iPhone without 3G/4G would sell incredibly well, like the iPad does.
This alone should cut $200 off of the price.
I rarely use the dataplan while out and about, usually just a home thing.
My guess is, most people don't use dataplans. i know some of my relatives with smart phones don't have dataplans.
We want a phone, not a computer.
Disregarding the fact that numbers are going down, I don't like the way Apple is moving in terms of product lines to keep and which to eliminate. Keeping iPhone 4 and eliminating the 5 is beyond me, as well as keeping the iPad 2 and eliminating the 3.
My thoughts:
Apple is a public company and under pressure by its stockholders to continue to grow 20+% a year and maintain or increase its profit margins. The 5c as it stands could never be sold by Apple for less and still maintain the required profit margins. In fact it is quite possible that Apple cannot be competitive (i.e. build a phone with enough features) at a lower price point and still maintain its profit margins.
For an iPhone to cost $300 unsubsidized, it would likely have to be equivalent to an iPhone 4 or possibly a 3GS in terms of technology and features. It would always be seen as 'old tech'.
For an iPhone to cost $300 unsubsidized, it would likely have to be equivalent to an iPhone 4 or possibly a 3GS in terms of technology and features. It would always be seen as 'old tech'.
Ugh
Next week's MR News: The Power of Grandma and Teen-age Girls - 6 out of Ten iPhone 5Cs Sold Are Pink & White Then Surprisingly Followed By Yellow & Green.
However, They Are No Match To The Apple Fanboys (95% men , over 30 Years Old) Who Opted for The Latest & Greatest iGadget, iPhone 5S
99.5% of iPhone 5S men buyers in the USA grabbed the space grey. In a poll conducted in a mecca of male Apple fanboys in the Northeast, the majority said they would have considered buying or would have bought the iPhone 5C if it is available in black as the color choices are all for the ladies or teenage girls. "This will serve as a great lesson to Apple for iPhone 6. Real American fanboys will only buy iPhones in black!", one of the fanboys said. The same fanboy also confessed, he is one of those trolling MR because he hated the very feminine look of iO7. He and his fellow redneck friends are glad that his "black iPhone 5S metal" (he refuses to call it space grey) is a fantastic contrast to the "bubble gum icons".
The 5C is $1. How can that not address a market? People who are upgrading or signing a new contract, and getting a BRAND NEW IPHONE for $1. And they can be different because there's is a flashy color and not the stodgy colors of the 5S.
Just because it doesn't fit into your little world, doesn't mean that there aren't millions of other consumers out there who will purchase one and love it. 5/5C tech is pretty amazing as it is. Not everyone needs the latest and greatest. Some buy based on how a product looks.
It's simply the price that's killing the 5c but don't tell Apple this they'll raise the price of the 5s instead.
Comparing 5c sales to what they might have been if its price was lower is misguided. The real comparison is what the *profits* are relative to if they had continued with their previous sales model i.e. keeping the iPhone 5 and lowering its price.
We can't know if Apple is selling more 5C's than a hypothetically discounted vanilla iPhone 5 (although my guess is they are). But we can be nearly certain they are making more profit. The outer antenna band on the 5 is expensive, and by switching to a plastic case Apple has surely reduced the manufacturing cost of the 5C relative to the 5. Thus, greater margins and profits, and a clear win for the 5C strategy.
Apple should just announce they will sell the iPhone 5c at the following prices:
US$49 16 GB (two-year contract initial price)
US$99 32 GB (two-year contract initial price)
US$299 16 GB (unlocked phone price)
US$399 32 GB (unlocked phone price)
Watch sales zoom through the roof if that happens.![]()
A Wi-fi only iPhone without 3G/4G would sell incredibly well, like the iPad does.
This alone should cut $200 off of the price.
I rarely use the dataplan while out and about, usually just a home thing.
My guess is, most people don't use dataplans. i know some of my relatives with smart phones don't have dataplans.
We want a phone, not a computer.