Maybe they should make more robust phones.
Agreed. They should use glass that doesn't break like every other smartphone maker.
Maybe they should make more robust phones.
a whole meter!
LOL, so you can't make a case for the iphone unless you follow what Apple says? Or you just can't say its MFI certified? Why can't anyone just make a case the way they want and say its for a iPhone #. This seems retarded to me. That's fine if they want to slap a label on that says tested up to 1 meter.. but telling case makers you can't put "made for iphone 6" on the box unless it complies is just stupid.
The way iPhone owners express righteous indignation after dropping their phones and shattering their screens cracks me up. "It's all APPLE's fault!!" Sorry folks, anything made of glass has the possibility of shattering when dropped, so let's not fault them for trying to help protect against accidents by asking for sturdier cases.
Incidentally, this isn't an Apple-only complaint as some would like to believe. I was in an AT&T store waiting to get a glass screen protector installed and there was a guy with a Galaxy S5 absolutely losing his mind. His phone looked like someone took a ballpene hammer to it with big chunks of glass missing. He was yelling at the manager claiming that he knocked it off his 3 foot nightstand onto a shag carpet and it just "exploded".
No one wants to take personal responsibility anymore.
Agreed. They should use glass that doesn't break like every other smartphone maker.
Not sure how many case manufacturers case about the MFi program (I could be dead wrong) but given that a non-battery case has little need to have that accreditation for many consumers to buy it, why adhere to strict guidelines like this.
Clearly Apple wants to have as much control if they are allowing their branding. Makes sense. Esp since broken screens and bent phones are something the genius desk has to deal with.
I do wonder if in the future, AppleCare will adjust their policy to only be inclusive of accredited cases, etc for claims.
Maybe they should make more robust phones.
I don't get it...how can apple force a third party company to ensure their product protects a device from accidental damage? Will the company be banned from making cases for their products?
LOL, so you can't make a case for the iphone unless you follow what Apple says? Or you just can't say its MFI certified? Why can't anyone just make a case the way they want and say its for a iPhone #. This seems retarded to me.
The burden should be on the clumsy to protect their phones with extra bulk. I'm happy with mine thin without a case. No problems with durability here.
Maybe that's about pocket height for average user?
I don't get it...how can apple force a third party company to ensure their product protects a device from accidental damage? Will the company be banned from making cases for their products?
LOL, so you can't make a case for the iphone unless you follow what Apple says? Or you just can't say its MFI certified? Why can't anyone just make a case the way they want and say its for a iPhone #. This seems retarded to me. That's fine if they want to slap a label on that says tested up to 1 meter.. but telling case makers you can't put "made for iphone 6" on the box unless it complies is just stupid. Not to mention I hate cases that have a ridge around the entire phone, it collects so much dust when you put it in and take it out of your pocket, I like having the top and bottom, or at least one free and clear so I can easily wipe the dust off.. Apple you are really going to far with this.. I didn't know it was April 1st today.