thegreatgonzo said:Hi guys, contrary to what some have said, apple does have some.....if not a great deal, of responsibility.
You see apple has designated this item as "made for ipod" all items that carry this seal of approval are acknowledged by apple as being of suitable quality and safety as well as compatibility, there should be a "made for ipod" logo on the packaging which means the product is endorsed by apple!
Im not sure about US law but here in Britain it is the retailer who is jointly responsible for the customers safety as well as the manufacturer and as the apple store sold you it the first port of call should be them!
California said:Is it clear he purchased from an Apple store? I missed that. And I'm dubious Apple could be sued for poor manufacture of an item that they may only have tangentially endorsed. That would be company suicide to be liable for a product that they did not manufacture.
The litigious idea of only suing the "big pockets" regardless of true liability here in the U.S. has put too many companies out of business -- it is a rank socialist idea that belongs rotting with Lenin and Marx in their graves. (and yes, I know Marx is buried in London...!)
stevep said:Yep. you missed it:
Purchased at the Apple Store Crystal Court, Santa Ana, CA
Date/Time: December 25th at 7:00 PM PST
Apple didn't 'tangientially endorse' the product (whatever that means), they SOLD it to him. Since when has a company not been responsible for what they sell? Of course they're responsible. It might not be Apples fault, (and probably isn't, in which case Apple in turn claim damages from the manufacturer), but this isn't about whose fault it is, it's about whose responsibility it is.
The whole point is that if you buy a set of speakers it is reasonable to expect them not to burst into flames on the first day and destroy the decor in your living room and front porch. If they do it's reasonable to expect the supplier to compensate you for the damage done. If they don't agree to compensate you, it is your right to seek legal means of redress.
Ralph Nader, where are you?
I guess he could sue for $10 for new decorations... but that's it.stevep said:He had damages - he's got to redecorate the porch and part of his living room. So he can justifiably ask for compensation.
Did you read the text on the guys website? Apparently not, and I quote:EricNau said:I guess he could sue for $10 for new decorations... but that's it.
I guess he could sue for $55.stevep said:Did you read the text on the guys website? Apparently not, and I quote:
BTW the smoke from the unit was that thick black type that sticks to walls - we are going to have to repaint... both the liviing room wall and the porch...
10$ wouldn't even pay for the paint.
EricNau said:
Ricker, please change your website and get rid of the "Apple" in Apple/SonicImpact's i-Fusion (speakers for the i-pod may prove to be hazardous to your household... and please get rid of the store where you bought it... No one cares. All we care about is the brand of the speakers (Sonic iFusion).
It's not fair to blame a good company that had nothing to do with it. Soon I'm going to see chain-emails floating around with the subject "Fwd: Apple products burst into flames" because someone misunderstood your website.
Thanks for backing me up.California said:Eric -- exactly. I read that the sales on extra-iPod products has reached something like 300 million dollars a quarter (or something like that) for companies like Sonic iFusion who piggyback/parasite off Apple's product line.
Just because this product was iPod compatible does NOT MEAN APPLE HAS ANY RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY. And the guy should take the Apple off his website -- Apple could prove damages if a false "rumor" gets started, just like they sued that website for leaking confidential industrial secrets pertaining to its product line.
I wouldn't file a homeowners claim for a petty thing like this. Your homeowners insurance will start to look for ways to either drop you or raise your rates.California said:And yeah, I'd just file a homeowner's claim. Let the insurance adjusters investigate who is at fault -- that is their job.
stevep said:Since when has a company not been responsible for what they sell? Of course they're responsible. It might not be Apples fault, (and probably isn't, in which case Apple in turn claim damages from the manufacturer), but this isn't about whose fault it is, it's about whose responsibility it is.
The whole point is that if you buy a set of speakers it is reasonable to expect them not to burst into flames on the first day and destroy the decor in your living room and front porch. If they do it's reasonable to expect the supplier to compensate you for the damage done. If they don't agree to compensate you, it is your right to seek legal means of redress.
Ralph Nader, where are you?
Perhaps you should read it again. Apple are responsible for choosing the products they stock in their shops. No-one forces them to stock particular products, or to sell them. It's not their fault that the product was allegedly faulty, but they are still the ones who sold it and are therefore responsible. It is up to them to sort the problem out (if there is one) with their customer (this is basic contract stuff - the contract was between the customer and Apple). Apple then have the right to go after the company that made the allegedly faulty product.California said:Wow. I've only taken high school level government and a few college courses on basic constituational law, but this makes no sense to think that Apple is at fault. To say: " this isn't about whose fault it is, it's about whose responsibility it is." Huh?
What contract?stevep said:(this is basic contract stuff - the contract was between the customer and Apple).
Note: Products sold through this website that do not bear the Apple Brand name are serviced and supported exclusively by their manufacturers in accordance with terms and conditions packaged with the products. Apple's Limited Warranty does not apply to products that are not Apple-branded, even if packaged or sold with Apple products. Please contact the manufacturer directly for technical support and customer service.
Actually they do. Thats how most noise cancelling head phones work. You put the abttery in, it sends out a signal that interfers with the outside noise making it quiet for you inside. AKA there are headphones w/ batteries in them.After G said:It's a good thing they don't make battery-powered headphones ...
But in all seriousness, that's just ... wow. Don't they test these things?
Counterfit said:Originally Posted by stevep
(this is basic contract stuff - the contract was between the customer and Apple).
What contract?
From the bottom of the Sonic Impact i-Fusion speaker page, on Apple's store
Quote:
Note: Products sold through this website that do not bear the Apple Brand name are serviced and supported exclusively by their manufacturers in accordance with terms and conditions packaged with the products. Apple's Limited Warranty does not apply to products that are not Apple-branded, even if packaged or sold with Apple products. Please contact the manufacturer directly for technical support and customer service.