Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
New iPhone mini confirmed!

Or these are really huge hands.

View attachment 2498311
1743596023980.png
1743596171617.png

Sorry, this is my hand holding a regular 13 that way, it's pretty close.
My hands are average-big, I'm no André the Giant.
 
Apple patents hundreds of things because of US patent system, one of them is a glass phone concept.
Macrumors: “Apple is obsessed”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CalMin
That won't affect people that much these days, when nobody knows how to use a phone anyway. Everyone I see using phones as phones uses them in one of two ways: either on speaker, held out in front of them like some AH from The Apprentice, or worse, *not* on speaker, but trying to achieve the same thing, constantly moving the phone between their mouth and their ear.

I don't think there's any other explanation: people are stupid now.

Apparently reality TV is to blame for this. An entire generation has now grown up seeing everyone on TV on speakerphone all the time for the benefit of the cameras.
 
Glass sucks. Just like the all-glass Apple watch, maybe it's an okay idea for people who sit around all day. Active people, and people who actually use their phone in non-perfect environments, will be running the other direction.

..and how is this going to do with a case? I won't currently carry my phone across the living-room without one.

Apple is "obsessed" (there's that word again but actually used properly this time I think) with objects that look beautiful but are impractical to use.

I'm almost to the point where I'm just going to embrace the wabi-sabi of nicked up devices. The iPhone's screen is made of the most delicate, fragile glass-like substance that scratches if the slightest breeze blows across it. Everything they make is a fingerprint magnet.

It kind of just feels like more evidence that the top management at Apple is out of touch. None of them use cases. But they also don't use their own Macs or pay for their own AppleCare.
 
A sizeable chunk of this feels like defensive patents to me, designed to protect Apple from a competitor coming out with a revolutionary product that makes their existing products look dated.

The all glass, multi-sided phone concept in particular feels like a solution in search of a problem - with the increased issue of greater fragility all for the benefit of users who apparently can't hold their device the right way round so they can see the screen.

Samsung already tried this years ago with their Edge series and everyone hated it.

Also, Apple already has plenty of Springboard, orientation, drawing bugs, etc etc. They can barely handle the Home Screen as it is these days. They will never get it to jump all around like this without being an absolute unusable mess.
 
how dare Apple spend their R&D resources exploring new form factors and functionality
 
I find it annoying as it is that every millimeter of the iPhone’s screen seem to trigger or respond to something these days. Including the Lock Screen.
 
Samsung already tried this years ago with their Edge series and everyone hated it.

Also, Apple already has plenty of Springboard, orientation, drawing bugs, etc etc. They can barely handle the Home Screen as it is these days. They will never get it to jump all around like this without being an absolute unusable mess.

History is littered with attempts at a new product that didn't work and "everyone hated it", before someone came along and nailed it.

A few examples:

Touch screens before iPhone, tablets before iPad, e-readers before Kindle, streaming video before Netflix, to name a few.

Because something hasn't worked yet doesn't mean it can't work later when executed properly.
 
History is littered with attempts at a new product that didn't work and "everyone hated it", before someone came along and nailed it.

A few examples:

Touch screens before iPhone, tablets before iPad, e-readers before Kindle, streaming video before Netflix, to name a few.

Because something hasn't worked yet doesn't mean it can't work later when executed properly.

Alright fair enough but riddle me this. When all the edges are active screens, where do I hold it?

There are new and innovative approaches to old problems, but some things are limited by physics and anatomy.
 
Apple is still obsessed with things that make little difference to the user experience.
(think creepy eyes on the outside of Vision Pro)
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula and Mr_Ed
Are “defensive patents” really a thing?

I can hand sketch something without any proof that I can actually produce it, and this stops a potential competitor who actually can from doing it?

Crazy if that’s the case.
 
Alright fair enough but riddle me this. When all the edges are active screens, where do I hold it?

There are new and innovative approaches to old problems, but some things are limited by physics and anatomy.

I don't pretend to be an expert, but perhaps there are things that can be done with software to recognize when it's been held and when something an action is being taken.

But that's just useless speculation. What I really want to say is that the nature of innovation is that many things fail, and some of the failures lead to happy, unintended accidents and breakthroughs elsewhere.

What I am suggesting is that R&D isn't a linear, but an exploration that can lead to unexpected places.

The origin story of Viagra comes to mind as a prime example.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DefNotAnLLM
Sounds like progress in the direction of an easily breakable device that will be almost impossible to use. Can you imagine all those hand positions affecting what happens on the phone? You'd be flipping it around in your hand, trying to make it come back from some inexplicable thing it did, until it flips out of your hand and breaks. You'd have to turn off all the hand positioning stuff and enclose it in a rubber case. I've already got that one.
 
Just wrap it with color E-paper, then you can have the appearance of transparency. 📱 :cool:
 
I’ve never paid for Apple Care before but I’m suspecting this repair is more expensive than a regular iPhone.

Purely conceptual though I love the idea of a seamless design like I loved the unified look of my iPhone 7 Jet Black for example. But I don’t love the over complicated tech that’s needed here.
we need a redux of the jet black iPhone 7 with faceID and Dynamic Island. just imagine how slick that would be with the narrow bezels of today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DefNotAnLLM
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.