Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,425
37,610


Apple is seeking to improve Spotlight search, but is still years away from launching a search engine to rival Google, according to The Information.

hey-siri-banner-apple.jpg

The paywalled report explains that Apple's search technology faces a setback amid loss of talent to Google. In 2018, Apple sought to bolster development of a web search engine by buying machine learning startup Laserlike, which was founded by three former Google search engineers. The company's technology recommended websites based on a user's interests and browsing history. Now, Laserlike's founders have reportedly returned to Google.

Apple's search team is believed to contain at least 200 employees and powers the technology behind Spotlight, Siri Suggestions, and answers provided by Siri. The company is still at least four years away from launching a replacement to Google search, according to one person involved with the team speaking to The Information. While Google pays Apple around $15 billion per year to stay as the default search engine on Apple devices, Apple developing an in-house rival to Google search could increase its leverage during its periodic negotiations with Google over the deal.

In the meanwhile, Apple has apparently discussed using the technology to power search for Apple Music and the App Store. Apple currently uses the search technology to generate data for Apple teams developing apps that use natural language processing, such as the Translate app, and to use tweets to determine newsworthy events that should show up in results and recommend Apple News articles. One of the team's immediate priorities is said to be improving Spotlight so that it can handle "100 times more" queries than it does today.

Article Link: Apple Losing Talent to Google Amid Push to Improve Spotlight and Launch Search Engine
 
I wonder if Apple dropped some heavy cash to poach engineers, like I’m sure Google does to maintain their place at the top of searching, then they would be able retain top talent.
 
Another hint that Apple desperately wants to join the ad business?

If so, sad times for Apple...

Apple is already in the ad business in other ways. They are also essentially already is in the search ad business by the $15+ billion deal they have with Google. I'd rather see Apple have its own successful search engine than simply be the (default) vehicle that pushes Apple users to Google search.
 
Why would Apple lose billions when iOS lists Yahoo, Bing, DuckDuckGo, and Ecosia as search engine options?

I read the comment as that they would add Neeva as THE default search engine. If that were the case, Apple would lose the billions coming from Google as the default. But if it's simply as another option then, no, it shouldn't matter.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if Apple dropped some heavy cash to poach engineers, like I’m sure Google does to maintain their place at the top of searching, then they would be able retain top talent.
I hear there are some great engineers from Meta and Twitter who are looking for jobs right now. No need for Apple to drop any heavy cash to poach away their talent. :p
 
Apple's search systems, depending on where it is, can be awful. Some are good, but Apple Music is not.
Apple search generally sucks:

Spotlight search sucks
Finder search sucks
Siri search sucks
Apple Music search sucks
AppStore search sucks
Network Share search sucks

What's left to suck?

When I search for files, I simply open the terminal and use "find ./ -iname '*filename*'" command, it's at least reliable.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.