Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
mpw said:
Flash of inspiration, (and like all good flashes there's sure to be a good reason why it obviously isn't workable) maybe the move to having Mac in the name of all hardware products running OSX is so the 'i' brand can be fully cross platform. The iPod already is so Apple would just release iLife for Windows and of course the iPhone will sync with both OSs. What do you think am iRight?

Definately not. They would never realease iLife for Windows. That would just be silly!:D
 
yoda13 said:
Come on black and dedicated graphics chipset....:D
Am I the only one who keeps reading that as "Come on black and white graphics chipset" whenever it's quoted?

I think a May release is possible, but it will be at an event, of the type Steve can make a Stevenote at. That probably means a one-off press conference (the only show on the horizon is the E3 thing, and it seems an unlikely venue.)

BTW all those saying they'll buy it the day it comes out... what if it's crap? I mean, what if the $999 model has Intel Integrated Graphics, 256Mb of RAM, a Combo drive, 40Gb HD, a 1.5GHz Core Solo, and no firewire ports or built-in Wifi?

Personally I suspect it'll have firewire, and maybe half a gig of RAM, but the rest of the spec isn't that unlikely.
 
monkeyandy said:
Definately not. They would never realease iLife for Windows. That would just be silly!:D
*poof!* there's the inspiration killer.:(
 
haha, well if it comes out in May that'll be good cause I know I won't be able to pick one up till June. Though I could stop by St. Lou and pick one up after getting back from the Germanies. That is, if there isn't a shortage :(
 
tuesday.gif


Obligatory
 
peharri said:
Am I the only one who keeps reading that as "Come on black and white graphics chipset" whenever it's quoted?

I think a May release is possible, but it will be at an event, of the type Steve can make a Stevenote at. That probably means a one-off press conference (the only show on the horizon is the E3 thing, and it seems an unlikely venue.)

BTW all those saying they'll buy it the day it comes out... what if it's crap? I mean, what if the $999 model has Intel Integrated Graphics, 256Mb of RAM, a Combo drive, 40Gb HD, a 1.5GHz Core Solo, and no firewire ports or built-in Wifi?

Personally I suspect it'll have firewire, and maybe half a gig of RAM, but the rest of the spec isn't that unlikely.

Every mac now comes with a min. of 512 ram so thats a given. I'd say they'll give us a bit more than 40gb for the low end model. 40gb is not enough to use iLife to its full potential which is one of Apples main selling points.
 
firsttube said:
They're going to keep the iBook name. There might be some macbook 13" too, but they're going to keep iBook for the consumer notebook. Mark my words, or I'll eat something gross or something. :D

Everyone is assuming the name will be MacBook because when the MacBook Pro was announced Steve himself said they wanted "Mac" in all their computer names. iMac still works but iBook doesn't. While I kind of see Steve's point, I really hate MacBook. MacNote seems better to me.

I'm ready to move on from all the "iWhatever" names. There were rumors years ago that Apple was dropping all these conventions. iTools became .Mac and with the release of GarageBand the rumors picked up a bit. The newer consumer apps no longer have "i" we now get Front Row, Photo Booth, etc.
 
4God said:
Ahhh..., that's it. iMacbook. :)
Well, you need "i", for branding, "Mac" because Steve likes that, and they can't call it iMac, because that's something else, so, without further ado, the name of the next iBook: Maci (pronounced makkey)

No, seriously, I think Macbook is most likely, especially because the other one is called Macbook Pro.


Peharri said:
Am I the only one who keeps reading that as "Come on black and white graphics chipset" whenever it's quoted?

I think a May release is possible, but it will be at an event, of the type Steve can make a Stevenote at. That probably means a one-off press conference (the only show on the horizon is the E3 thing, and it seems an unlikely venue.)

BTW all those saying they'll buy it the day it comes out... what if it's crap? I mean, what if the $999 model has Intel Integrated Graphics, 256Mb of RAM, a Combo drive, 40Gb HD, a 1.5GHz Core Solo, and no firewire ports or built-in Wifi?

Personally I suspect it'll have firewire, and maybe half a gig of RAM, but the rest of the spec isn't that unlikely.

Integrated graphics, definitly on low-end, 265 RAM, impossible, Combo, possible, 40 GB, likely, 1.5 Solo, again, on low-end, Firewire, really likely on all models, Wifi ==> standard on all Macs
 
gropo said:
I find that re-branding highly unlikely... Why would Apple work against the 'iPod branding halo' by changing the name of their entry-level notebooks?

MacBook Pro
iMac
PowerMac
iBook

???

.... one of these things is not like the other.

Jobs wants "Mac" in the names of all of Apple's products, why would they make an exception with this one product? No, I disagree with you, I find it very unlikely that Apple would not rebrand the iBook. After all, why have a MacBook Pro if there's no MacBook in the first place? :cool:
 
gropo said:
I find that re-branding highly unlikely... Why would Apple work against the 'iPod branding halo' by changing the name of their entry-level notebooks?

Steve Jobs already stated they want "Mac" in the name of all their computers. That's why.
 
peharri said:
... what if it's crap? I mean, what if the $999 model has Intel Integrated Graphics, 256Mb of RAM, a Combo drive, 40Gb HD, a 1.5GHz Core Solo, and no firewire ports or built-in Wifi?

Personally I suspect it'll have firewire, and maybe half a gig of RAM, but the rest of the spec isn't that unlikely.
I think WiFi's a dead cert and I'll buy you one if it isn't* 512Mb of RAM will be the minimum and I doubt they'll want to release a new PC with less HDD space than an available iPod.

*absolute LIE
 
1984 said:
Steve Jobs already stated they want "Mac" in the name of all their computers. That's why.


Agreed. I think it's pretty obvious that the iBook will be renamed MacBook. As stated, why have a MacBook Pro w/o a MacBook in the first place?
 
ISight

tekriter said:
the built-in iSight means almost anyone who works in a secure area, such as a military base, defense contractor, even many ad agencies will NOT be allowed to have one on the premises.

My office has a strict no-cameras policy, even cell phone cameras are not allowed.


Interesting point you make regarding the isight and secure environments. This makes me wonder if Apple will allow its employees to utilize its own hardware on campus. Of course they will but it would be interesting to see how they handle it.
 
peharri said:
Am I the only one who keeps reading that as "Come on black and white graphics chipset" whenever it's quoted?

I think a May release is possible, but it will be at an event, of the type Steve can make a Stevenote at. That probably means a one-off press conference (the only show on the horizon is the E3 thing, and it seems an unlikely venue.)

BTW all those saying they'll buy it the day it comes out... what if it's crap? I mean, what if the $999 model has Intel Integrated Graphics, 256Mb of RAM, a Combo drive, 40Gb HD, a 1.5GHz Core Solo, and no firewire ports or built-in Wifi?

Personally I suspect it'll have firewire, and maybe half a gig of RAM, but the rest of the spec isn't that unlikely.

Well I *AM* on a Tibook... And a smaller guy would interest me a lot. It's gonna have Wifi, BT and FW as a standard. Even the 999 version. Though I'm looking for around 1500 to spend. I really DON'T want the integrated graphics - but if I have to get them I decided it's not a big deal anyway. All the games I play run on 64MB of vcard memory anyway so they should run fine offset by a dual core w/ integratedness. Like Mafia in WinXP :D

I basically upgrading for smaller size, iSight, FR, USB 2.0 and BT so a little extra speed would be awesome, it's not mandatory though.
 
mpw said:
I think WiFi's a dead cert and I'll buy you one if it isn't* 512Mb of RAM will be the minimum and I doubt they'll want to release a new PC with less HDD space than an available iPod.

*absolute LIE

What's that? Subliminal messaging?
 
Hope it is hot...well, better not...

I really would jump for a 13' model without a doubt.
If I am not wrong, I stopped by at least 3 times at our nearest
Apple Store to get the Pro version but the heat coming out
was always a turn down on my plans.

Unfortunately, the current market prices indicates that we
may have a dual core inside this machine, which means HEAT.
 
nagromme said:
For my needs, 13" widescreen, dual cores, and GPU with VRAM, would be great!

For masses of other shoppers, 13" with single core and integrated graphics, at a low price point, would sell like crazy.

Let's hope we see something at both ends of that scale.
Amen.
It`d be really great if there are atleast 2 mobels of MB available at the launch. One the usual 999$ core duo with integrated gfx,combo drive and the higher end with at the very least 64 MB dedicated VRAM(atleast),Superdrive for around 1300-1400$.
And please dont forget the color option. I m already bored of the all white look. White gets dirty way too easily. I had to clean my iBook every week to keep it from looking UGLY.
azentropy said:
I find it more unlikely that the "iBook" would be the only Macintosh without the name "Mac" in it. So I say it is more likely to be MacBook, but I have a hunch it is going to be called iMacbook...
Noooooooooooo. Thats even worse than MacBook. Pleas no.
Macnoviz said:
Not again...

So we continue our intel iBook saga with yet another rumor.
I have been waiting almost a year for this, but somewhere in February I lost all confidence in these sort of rumors.

I will believe it when I see it on the Apple site, or when Steve Jobs comes to deliver it to me personally.

These are the only two situations I will believe it is finally there.
That definitely makes me feel better. I`ve been waiting for just 3 weeks now. Yes even I`ve also lost hopes in all these rumors. But still somewhere down there wenever I see a light I start jumpin all over, THERE`S THE MACBOOK. THERE IT IS.
And two days later, GOD DAMN IT. WHERE`S THE MACBOOK. WHERE THE HELL IS THE MACBOOK?

Definitely I dont really believe we`ll see MB before Aug. But then I`ll love to be proved Wrong. Can ya hear me Steve....
 
esaleris said:
We know the difference; they target market doesn't.

In using integrated, they are clearly segmenting the market and forcing people to make the jump to the MBP if they want something that does dedicated graphics.

Heh, maybe they could at least make a BTO option for those of us who really, really want that 13" screen with an integrated graphics card. (I like to kill my eyes playing games on my tiny, ultraportable laptop :) Otherwise I'd just get the MBP...would've saved the wait, lol)

And forget black...bright Ferrari red is the dream colour :D
 
Apple vs. AT&T

gropo said:
I find that re-branding highly unlikely... Why would Apple work against the 'iPod branding halo' by changing the name of their entry-level notebooks?

If AT&T Wireless can be re-branded to Cingular (for $4 Bln), then Cingular back to AT&T Wireless (for $2 Bln), anything's possible.

Maybe we'll get "PowerBook" back by the end of the year! ;)
 
fabsgwu said:
If AT&T Wireless can be re-branded to Cingular (for $4 Bln), then Cingular back to AT&T Wireless (for $2 Bln), anything's possible.

Maybe we'll get "PowerBook" back by the end of the year! ;)

Agreed.
And if Windows 2000 (for $ 2Bln as a guesstimate) can be rebranded and sold as Windows XP (for ??? lots of $$)...


OMG its AS IF ITS ALL A GIANT SCHEME TO MAKE MONEY!!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.