Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Where did you see any reference to Spotify in my post? What does Spotify have to do with Apple violating the court ruling in Netherlands?
So is Spotify not one of the EU app developers that you hypothesized would switch to developing solely for Android if Apple pulled out of the EU market? If you are going to feign indignation over my response, at least double check your own comment which mentioned nothing about the Netherlands or violation of a court ruling.
 
So is Spotify not one of the EU app developer that you hypothesized would switch to developing solely for Android if Apple pulled out of the EU market? If you are going to feign indignation over my response, at least double check your own comment which mentioned nothing about the Netherlands or violation of a court ruling.
It was implied in my post that those benefits would only exist for local app developers (like the Netherlands' date app developers). That's too obvious to spell it explicitly. Besides, Spotify would still benefit from Apple leaving EU. All their customers now would be able to use convenient in-app interface for purchases and subscriptions without Apple tax.
 
It was implied in my post that those benefits would only exist for local app developers (like the Netherlands' date app developers). That's too obvious to spell it explicitly. Besides, Spotify would still benefit from Apple leaving EU. All their customers now would be able to use convenient in-app interface for purchases and subscriptions without Apple tax.
It was not and what does this have to do with the black-sand beaches of Hawaii?
 
It was implied in my post that those benefits would only exist for local app developers (like the Netherlands' date app developers). That's too obvious to spell it explicitly. Besides, Spotify would still benefit from Apple leaving EU. All their customers now would be able to use convenient in-app interface for purchases and subscriptions without Apple tax.
And give top access to their global iOS customers?
 
It is possible that complying with EU regulation could cut into revenue and profits in all markets. Not just the EU. There are a lot of products not sold in California because complying with California regulations would make their products less or unprofitable elsewhere because it’s too costly to provide products or service for one particular market that are significantly different from the others. Car manufacturers have had to deal with this for ages which is why all cars sold in the US either meet California standards no matter what state they are sold in or are not sold in California at all depending on what impact they believe meeting those standard will have on overall profitability of the model.

The EU may be a big market but it may not be larger in revenue than smaller markets where Apple has a greater installed base with more active consumers and preserving that EU revenue may not be in Apple’s financial interest if it means being less profitable in all their other markets.

I’m not saying Apple will do this, but it is not without precedent and there are many layers of logical rationalization that may make it justifiable business-wise than just looking at the top numbers.
There’s a monumental difference between cars and apps. You can make changes to digital goods like apps fairly easily. I do take your point, but I think the impact it has in this case is infinitely less substantial. We already see Apple shipping its own hardware with some capabilities removed in certain markets. It's really not that big of a deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: h0ndaf4n
What do the global iOS customers have to do with EU customers?
If would have read my original comment instead of just blindly replying to it with nonsense, you would know that I was taking about if Apple left the EU market it would also cut off access to the AppStore and iOS devices globally to all EU-based developers as doing business with EU developers would still create a nexus in the EU for Apple to be subject to their laws. Basically exit means complete exit and it would negatively impact EU companies maybe mores so than Apple. Imagine US costumers not being able be use the Lufthansa App to book flights.. etc..
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: maiingun
There’s a monumental difference between cars and apps. You can make changes to digital goods like apps fairly easily. I do take your point, but I think the impact it has in this case is infinitely less substantial. We already see Apple shipping its own hardware with some capabilities removed in certain markets. It's really not that big of a deal.
Really depends on the cost of compliance among other things. Again, I'm not saying Apple will or should leave, but there is a lot of details none of us know that factor into that decision. My guess is that Apple uses their position as the sole regulator of the AppStore globally to enforce their rules on developers in the EU and other jurisdiction. EU can only pass laws regarding the EU and and can't stop Apple from telling EU developers that if they want their Apps also available in other markets like the US AppStore they will have to comply with a more stricter set of rules that may include not having a side-loaded app or accept external payments in any market even if it is legally allowed. That will kick off a whole string of court battles, but the WTO would probably be on Apple's side.
 
If would have read my original comment instead of just blindly relying to it with nonsense, you would know that I was taking about if Apple left the EU market it would also cut off access to the AppStore and iOS devices globally to all EU-based developers as doing business with EU developers would still create a nexus in the EU for Apple to be subject to their laws. Basically exit means complete exit and it would negatively impact EU companies maybe mores so than Apple. Imagine US costumers not being able be use the Lufthansa App to book flights.. etc..
Nonsense. For markets in non EU countries, both Apple and app developers should obey the laws of respective countries, not EU. Apple would not be able to discriminate app developers from EU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brucemr
Nonsense. For markets in non EU countries, both Apple and app developers should obey the laws of respective countries, not EU. Apple would not be able to discriminate app developers from EU.
They certainly could. They do it now with other countries. There are no developers in Syria, North Korea, Sudan, Crimea, or Cuba with apps in any AppStore. Just in the last few months Apple and Amazon have both stopped accepting new developer accounts in Russia and are limiting services to existing developers and culling back the reach of their apps and ability to accept transactions with the anticipation of a complete block. There is no US law that say you have to accept customers from other regions if you don't want to.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: maiingun
They certainly could. They do it now with other countries. There are no developers in Syria, North Korea, Sudan, Crimea, or Cuba with apps in any AppStore. Just in the last few months Apple and Amazon have both stopped accepting new developer accounts in Russia and are limiting services to existing developers and culling back the reach of their apps and ability to accept transactions with the anticipation of a complete block. There is no US law that say you have to accept customers from other regions if you don't want to.
That's apple and oranges. There are no apps from the developers from those countries because US government has sanctions against them and Apple is not allowed to work with any entities from these countries. Unless US government imposes sanctions against EU, Apple will have to work with their app developers. Besides, if iOS suddenly lost the apps from Lufthansa, Spotify etc. americans would switch to Android in no time.
 
That's apple and oranges. There are no apps from the developers from those countries because US government has sanctions against them and Apple is not allowed to work with any entities from these countries. Unless US government imposes sanctions against EU, Apple will have to work with their app developers. Besides, if iOS suddenly lost the apps from Lufthansa, Spotify etc. americans would switch to Android in no time.
That is factually wrong, If Apple is not doing business in the EU (again, a totally hypothetical situation that I don't believe will happen), they can do it on their own accord and they are not obligated to allow those EU-based developers access to their app stores anywhere in the world and, in fact, would still be considered operating in the EU if they did. There are many multi-national companies that have exited the EU over various laws and regulations or have never done business there at all. Even a lot of large global US and EU-based companies cut ties with the UK over Brexit. There is nothing special about Apple that would make them unique in this situation if they chose to do the same.

That's not saying a EU developer can't open up a legal office in the US or some other place and submit an app in the store, but they would be doing so outside of EU law and would only be subject to laws Apple felt were agreeable and still be at the discretion of Apple allowing their submission.

FYI: Apple's curtailing of business activities in Russia go above and beyond what sanctions call for and are a direct response to a hostile climate (currency instability, nationalization decrees, and censorship) that they believe is not conducive to conducting business to their standards and will reflect negatively on them in other markets
 
Last edited:
What region is Apple not already doing business in that’s going to outperform the EU? And why would they have to pull out of Europe in order to do business elsewhere? They’re still making plenty on hardware, and apps are a digital good. They can sell them everywhere because they’re essentially infinite. What you’re saying makes absolutely no sense.
Well, the US obviously. :) If the EU changes the rules such that the EU isn’t as profitable anymore, or if they pass rules stating that Apple can’t do business in the EU, they’ll just continue making money elsewhere and not in the EU. There will be a significant hit to Apple’s profits, but Apple will survive.
 
Well, the US obviously. :) If the EU changes the rules such that the EU isn’t as profitable anymore, or if they pass rules stating that Apple can’t do business in the EU, they’ll just continue making money elsewhere and not in the EU. There will be a significant hit to Apple’s profits, but Apple will survive.
Apple already operates in the US. They already focus on the US first and foremost. They’re still going to make an obscene amount of money in Europe even if App Store revenue drops to 0. You’re still making absolutely no sense.
 
Apple would never abandon the market, but the EU may force Apple out of the market. 30% poof! Apple will survive though. That 70% is more than enough to run a company and still pull a profit.


I’m saying Apple works under the rules of the countries they work in as long as those countries have rules that allow Apple to operate. It’s humorous that the rules in China and Russia are less restrictive than what’s proposed from the EU.
Why do you think google tried to re-enter china? They had the chance but abandoned it on their principles first. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragonfly_(search_engine)
The EU allowed Apple to operate in the EU previously. With the regulation changes, the EU may no longer be willing to allow Apple to operate, and that’s fine.

Well nobody would allow anything, EU doesn’t grant anyone a right to business, it’s free for everyone, and as with normal laws, if you break them you pay the price.
A lot of speculation has centered around lost sales of Apple devices in the EU if Apple were to hypothetically leave the market, but they don't see that it is a two-way street and how much leverage Apple actually has. It would be devastating to EU-based developers if they could no longer distribute their apps and services to iPhone customers in the EU or the rest of the world. If you think Spotify is squealing now, just imagine if their developer account is cut off and they loose access to half the US smartphone market and ~30% of the global one. EU consumers shifting to Android phones in the EU really doesn't solve this problem and it effectively neuters their power to enforce compliance out of their market. Remember, EU regulators are not trying to just regulate their market, they are actually trying to regulate the global market by imposing the "California Effect" making compliance to EU regulations the de facto standard for other markets.
There is quite literally the most one sided fight in the history of fights. EU have made zero mandates on developers, and they are free to do business with Apple ID they want. Way consumers would jus have a legkac

It is not the job of the EU regulators to consider the adverse affects to the companies that are impacted by their decisions. If a decision leads to a company no longer being able to be profitable, then that company will have to go out of business OR leave the EU.
Indeed, it’s their job to make sure the market is healthy.
The EU should be promoting competition though.
They are
I know. I want to know why they chose Dating apps as the battle field.
Because match group is a dating app company, that’s the market.
If promoting competition was the main goal, something more like what India is doing where they’re creating a phone platform would promote competition. EU hardware companies interested in the venture would be tasked with design and assembly, developers in the EU would benefit from not paying any commission on sales within the EU, there are lots of ways where the end result could turn out something so surprisingly good that Google and Apple would have to change their products to compete.

Promoting competition ISN’T the goal though, it’s more about removing all competition and leaving Google and Apple as the defacto technologies for EU citizens.
Why would EU dictate what companies create to be competitive? That’s not the government business to make An Eu phone, only to make sure the market is fair
I've long thought the more appropriate regulation would be to disallow the business model that allows android to thrive. That would result in more choices for consumers and developers. Make every smartphone company vertically integrated with it's own OS and ecosystem.
It is disallowed, EU have already started ruling against google lock-in policy. Currently google is forced to stop doing these thing’s etc
  1. by requiring mobile manufacturers to pre-install Google Search and Google Chrome browser and requiring them to set Google Search as default search service on their devices, as a condition to license certain Google proprietary apps;
  2. by giving financial incentives to manufacturers and mobile network operators on condition that they exclusively pre-install Google Search on their devices.
  3. by preventing manufacturers from selling smart mobile devices running on competing operating systems based on the Android open source code;

EU is engaged in protectionism because at the very lowest levels they have doubled-down on doing all the things that make their companies globally non-competitive. The irony is that while they believe they are giving their tech companies an equal footing, what they are really doing is removing the last barriers to being overrun by American, Asian, and even Eastern European companies that don't have the constraints on their structural, capital, and human resources that EU companies do.
I recommend you actually read the DMA. It doesn’t protect EU companies and it makes it easier for smaller companies to do things as they no longer need to follow Apple or googles demands.
SO, this is an interesting idea… for the myriad of phone providers to be required to provide their own OS and ecosystems. That would actually increase the amount of real choice more than what they’re currently thinking of doing. It would also mean that entering the EU market would require more than just creating some hardware and tossing a cookie-cutter OS on top of it. There would be a decent potential for something better than Apple or Google to come out of it as each one would be developing the OS they thing would give them the edge. I like it!
That would just fracture the market and encourage even more lock-ins. This has explicitly been banned, hence why google no longer can prevent phone manufacturers to only use their OS and no other competitive choices.

And this is the value of interoperability as it breaks the lock-in effect.
It would make the EU the one place in the world where actually putting in the work to create a non-Google OS would be beneficial to set oneself apart from the crowd. The EU would be a science lab of OS innovation, where any device available would been created with it’s OS tightly coupled with it’s feature set.
They already can do this. That is why we have android flavored systems as it’s extremely expensive and risky to make a new OS
 
Apparently the ACM are finally happy with the changes Apple are proposing which brings them in compliance.

Interestingly, despite what some people said about the ‘spirit of the ruling’, the ACM has no issue with Apple taking a 13% and 27% cut of transaction fees.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maiingun
Apple already operates in the US. They already focus on the US first and foremost. They’re still going to make an obscene amount of money in Europe even if App Store revenue drops to 0. You’re still making absolutely no sense.
If the EU forces Apple to end operations in Europe, Apple will survive. There will be a very serious financial hit, but Apple has money in the bank and coming in from non-EU regions that means they’ll still be around for years to come.
 
If the EU forces Apple to end operations in Europe, Apple will survive. There will be a very serious financial hit, but Apple has money in the bank and coming in from non-EU regions that means they’ll still be around for years to come.
The EU is not going to force Apple to end operations in Europe. 100% not going to happen. I don't understand why you're even entertaining this as a possibility.
 
Apparently the ACM are finally happy with the changes Apple are proposing which brings them in compliance.

Interestingly, despite what some people said about the ‘spirit of the ruling’, the ACM has no issue with Apple taking a 13% and 27% cut of transaction fees.
Because the ACM can’t rule in things the EU commission is investigating. Hence why they have made zero comments on it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.