Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Maps is way better. Anybody who thinks Google Maps is more accurate is working off decade’s old information. Google steers me wrong plenty and is often missing traffic data that I see on Apple Maps. Moreover, Apple responds quickly and fixes things if you report it (last time in less than 24 hours). Talking to Google is like screaming at a wall. And of course, Apple’s UI is way way better.

And of course, Apple anonymizes the data tracking.

If you have not compared them recently I recommend you run one on CarPlay while running the other on your iPhone with a dash mount. I think you might be surprised how good Apple Maps is now and how much Google has rested on their laurels.

Over here Apple Maps has years old information while Google Maps is up to date, Apple Maps will also routinely route you up one way streets or ask you to make illegal turns so it can be a safety risk to use for navigation in some areas.

Used Apple Maps in my last car because of better CarPlay integration and I had to use Google Maps on my phone to find an address of where I was going because Apple Maps could often not find it. If I would have kept that car I would probably have gone over to Android just to get Google Maps on my drivers display.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee
Apple has, for several years now, had the same reporting features that Waze has - speed traps, construction zones, crashed vehicles.

To access it, while navigating, tap the ^ on the lower right corner of the app, then Report an Incident - then tap on Crash, Hazard, or Speed Check.
Thanks.
But that’s only “When navigating” where the ^ shows, when you’re using to a specific location.
Otherwise, on the general screen, it doesn’t appear.

It's buried under submenus whereas the Waze version is on the general screen, even when not going to a specific location.

It's not intuitive to use esp. for anyone who hasn't used Apple Maps in a long while.

I thought Google bought out Waze. Do you know positively it was Apple?
Stand corrected.
Waze was bought out by Google, not Apple, way back in 2013.

Side note....
Here WeGo or Here Maps is/was relatively good, depending on the user.
It's reportedly considered a rival of Google Maps.

From Here's website...
"Here Technologies is a Dutch-based mapping company that in 2015 was bought by a consortium that included Audi, BMW and Mercedes-Benz for 2.8 billion euros.
The company has more than 35 years of experience in map-making and location technology. There are more than 170 million vehicles using Here's map data."

MR should consider doing a review of the Map apps: Google, Apple, Waze & Here.
 
Last edited:
I ditched Apple Maps after the first time I used it 13 years ago when it was new. I had a business meeting near Atlantic City NJ and AM kept trying to direct me about 1/2 mile out into the Atlantic Ocean :oops:. Based on the mostly-positive reviews on here, maybe it's time I give it another shot ...
 
I use AM if I want to listen to a book or podcast. Google maps when I need to get where I’m going.
 


Apple Maps has been providing navigational guidance to Apple users for almost 13 and a half years now, and much has changed about the app in that time. However, according to data from Canalys, the overwhelming majority of iPhones in the U.S. still have Google Maps downloaded as an alternative to Apple Maps, which comes preinstalled on all iPhones. We want to hear from MacRumors readers. Which do you prefer to get you from A to B?

Apple-Maps-vs-Google-Maps-Feature.jpg

Launched in September 2012, Apple Maps was quickly criticized for having incomplete and inaccurate mapping data, which led some iPhone users on dangerous routes. Apple CEO Tim Cook offered a rare public apology for the frustration it caused customers, and iOS chief Scott Forstall was ousted just one month later.

Since then, Apple has made significant improvements to Apple Maps, building in new features and correcting lingering errors. Real-time traffic information and navigation options for pedestrians were added to Maps in 2013, which is also the same year Maps was extended to OS X. In 2015, Maps was updated with "Nearby," a feature that offers up local points of interest and transit directions in a handful of cities.

In early 2020, Apple completed an overhaul of its maps in the United States, adding significantly greater detail including updated buildings, parks, sports fields, pools, and more. A Look Around feature in select cities is similar to Google's Street View, and the updated maps have been rolling out to more countries in the time since. In iOS 15, Apple introduced immersive walking directions shown in augmented reality, curated guides for select cities, real-time transit updates, and more road details for enhanced driving navigation. In iOS 16 it gained multi-stop routing. And in iOS 17, Apple made it possible to download maps for offline use – something Google Maps users have been able to do for quite some time.

Apple_Apple-Maps_New-Ways_09272021_big.jpg.large_2x.jpg

Have Apple's incremental improvements been enough for it to be considered an equal to Google Maps in users' eyes? Of course, Google developers have not stood idly by watching Apple Maps' gradual evolution. Google has introduced several enhancements aimed at enriching the user experience through advanced AI technology and more immersive visualization tools, and has even taken a leaf or two out of Apple's book.

One notable recent update in this regard is the Immersive View for Routes, which provides a comprehensive preview of a user's journey, whether they are driving, walking, or cycling. Launched last year, the tool combines billions of Street View and aerial images to create an intricate digital representation of the world, allowing users to visually navigate through bike lanes, sidewalks, intersections, and parking spaces along their route. It also includes a dynamic time slider indicating how conditions such as air quality and weather change throughout the day, helping users plan their trips with more precision.

Another significant improvement is the integration of Lens in Maps, an evolution of the Search with Live View feature. Leveraging AI and augmented reality, Lens in Maps helps users get their bearings in a new location by providing information about nearby amenities like ATMs, transit stations, and dining options. The feature has since been expanded to over 50 cities.

Google Maps has also rolled out updates to make navigation maps more reflective of real-world conditions. These include more detailed and realistic representations of buildings and improved lane guidance on highways. For electric vehicle owners, Google Maps also offers information on charging stations, including compatibility details, charger speed, and the last usage time.

google-maps-immersive-view.jpg

Despite these concurrent improvements to Google Maps, their combined effect hasn't stopped users coming away impressed by how far Apple's navigational guidance has come. Based on anecdotal reports, the app is increasingly recommended by users for its cleaner view versus the more cluttered design of Google Maps.

Likely thanks to its disastrous launch, Apple Maps still gets a bad rap among some users, but Apple's continued efforts to improve the app appear to have helped reverse some of those opinions. "Maps has come a long way, and people have noticed," Craig Federighi, Apple's head of software, said at WWDC 2023. Are you more or less likely to use Apple Maps these days? Let us know in the comments.

Article Link: Apple Maps vs. Google Maps: Which Is Better?
I like Apple Maps better because I'm Deaf, and I use the Apple Watch, which has a vibrate feature that reminds me to turn when driving.
 
  • Love
Reactions: SFjohn
I have used Apple Maps for ages. I have always found its ETA to be more accurate than other maps. It can also find my mothers cottage while the google options, GM and waze, always thought it was elsewhere. Sorry, to me local restaurants etc are not important in the map. I have plenty of other options to look for those destinations.
 
I ditched Apple Maps after the first time I used it 13 years ago when it was new. I had a business meeting near Atlantic City NJ and AM kept trying to direct me about 1/2 mile out into the Atlantic Ocean :oops:. Based on the mostly-positive reviews on here, maybe it's time I give it another shot ...

I've been using it for years. Probably the first couple of years were a little iffy here and there but then it got a LOT better very quickly and now I don't even think about the fact that my car's primary GPS is Apple Maps via CarPlay.

The audio direction is also immensely more helpful... I barely have to actually look at the map to follow the directions, down to the lane I need to be in two lights or one freeway exit ahead of a turn-off.

Also, the Siri, Reminders etc. integration is great... even if you turn off its ability to remember your common destinations (this gets a little creepy but that's true of any location tracking, not just Apple).

Full disclosure: I live in a 2nd Tier market (Dallas-Ft. Worth) which is very thoroughly mapped out.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SFjohn and heretiq
If I put my address on Google Maps it takes me to the house on next street. Apple Maps takes me to my home. So just purely based on personal experience, I rate Apple Maps higher than Google Maps. If its Bay Area and North America (Canada and US), Apple is good. For my home country, India, I dont even dare to use Apple. Google is the only choice in India.
 
I default to Apple Maps, just because it is more convenient, looks nicer (especially on my CarPlay screen), and hasn't left me wanting much. I do a lot of voice control in the car ("is there a gas station along my route?"), and Apple Maps really excels at providing options and adding them as stops along your route via Siri - I love the route deviation times it provides with the options.

Sometimes I go to Google Maps when planning trips for the ability to specify arrival/departure time for traffic estimates. If that's there in Apple Maps, too, I haven't seen it yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: heretiq
I default to Apple Maps, just because it is more convenient, looks nicer (especially on my CarPlay screen), and hasn't left me wanting much. I do a lot of voice control in the car ("is there a gas station along my route?"), and Apple Maps really excels at providing options and adding them as stops along your route via Siri - I love the route deviation times it provides with the options.

Sometimes I go to Google Maps when planning trips for the ability to specify arrival/departure time for traffic estimates. If that's there in Apple Maps, too, I haven't seen it yet.
Thanks for sharing this @PomUsTek. I use Siri sparingly with Apple Maps and CarPlay so never thought of using it for en-route navigation changes such as finding a gas station. This seems way better and safer than tapping on the screen and initiating search while driving. I’ll give it a try.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vjl323
Apple Maps is all I’ve used in the last decade, I don’t have “Google anything“ on my devices anymore. DuckDuckGo for search. No YouTube, no social media. Life is so much better now. 😉
 
Here’s the thing: you’re wrong. In every way.
Thank you — you said it way better than I could. That same person claims that Apple Maps and Google Maps are equal with respect to Privacy - presumably because Apple has iAds. Sheesh. 🙄
 
Still on Google Maps, but it has developed some quirks that affect usability, particularly in the LA area. It’ll take you on a route that is supposed to be faster because of traffic, but sometimes it is the strangest and most unintuitive detour, and ends being just as slow -or slower- than just sticking it out in traffic.

Exactly. Google Maps, like every Google product, has started to fail at its core function in weird ways lately. Like Gmail giving me notifications of spam emails that do go to spam but notify me on my Watch first anyway.

Or, as you say, sending me on weird indirect routes for no reason, including traffic.

If you really care about your route, it’s best to test both and see which makes more sense. Like a lot of software these days, it’s more about who’s less deliberately worse. Apple for now seems to care more about the interface and quality of Maps.
 
If they ditched Yelp reviews, I’d give it a proper shot.

I agree in principle but where else are reviews going to come from? Serious question. Google has taken over so much of the entire internet ecosystem.

Sadly if you really want the full picture you have to use both Google Maps and Apple Maps. One for information, one for navigation.
 
I agree in principle but where else are reviews going to come from? Serious question. Google has taken over so much of the entire internet ecosystem.

Sadly if you really want the full picture you have to use both Google Maps and Apple Maps. One for information, one for navigation.
While I agree somewhat, Apple could absolutely build their own - as they appear to be doing in small steps, as another user pointed out.
 
as you say, sending me on weird indirect routes for no reason, including traffic.
That was 50% of the reasons for me to go back to iPhone. My last iPhone was the 3GS until I came back to the SE 2nd. Google Maps is routing “for the greater good”, oh there are already 50 people on the best route, let’s send you down this potholed farm road. It doesn’t try to give YOU the best route for YOU, it’s trying to shape traffic.
 
Apple Maps:
- Traffic - when I first look up a destination, it shows me a few routes and their estimated traffic times. They generally are "main routes" (eg. large streets). You choose the one you want at the beginning, and then it sticks to it, and doesn't switch you mid-route if traffic has built such that there's a faster route
Apple Maps will offer to take an alternate route if things change "enough". I've had it offer to send me on an alternate route to detour around accidents and other extensive "dynamic" traffic jams. It is an offer, you have to OK the change.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.