Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I can definitely confirm this anecdotally. AT&T only gets 1-2 bars of service at my home, but that translates into constant dropped calls, or even the inability to make calls. Verizon gets the same 1-2 bars, but I haven't had a single dropped call and have been able to make all my calls.

None of this has anything to do with the issue here.
 
The maximum speeds are not important as no one needs that speed, the signal strength / quality and the performance at low strength is what matters. Unfortunately I seem to recall reading in a previous MR article that sadly also said the Intel performed worse in these conditions. I'd be interested in real world tests
 
  • Like
Reactions: xpxp2002
If I could get to 450Mbps I would take that. Fastest I have seen personally is about 90Mbps and that was only once. On average I see 40-50 so 450-600 is of no concern at this point.

If I could get to 15Mbps I would take that. I used to see it in Orlando...on my iPhone 4S. Haven't seen it once since getting LTE. Orlando, FL. Thanks AT&T.

Anyone else in Orlando? I seriously think (based on travel) that Orlando's AT&T LTE may be the worst of semi-major to major cities in the US.
 
The maximum speeds are not important as no one needs that speed, the signal strength / quality and the performance at low strength is what matters. Unfortunately I seem to recall reading in a previous MR article that sadly also said the Intel performed worse in these conditions. I'd be interested in real world tests
Its probably like the 6S chipgate, real world its not an issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TiquanS and DCINKC
Some Slim shady s***. I guess more people are waking up and decide to hop onto another train.
 
If this is true, **** Apple. I don't pay for verizon to be throttled by my phone company trying to save face/cash.

I'm already putting up with spinning beach ball on MacOS by just clicking the address bar in Safari...and countless other MacOS issues...If I dump MacOS or my iPhone i'm dumping both. ****'em

(i've been using mac since my dad bought a mac classic for like $6K in the mid eighties.)
 
This "study" makes no sense at all. There are too many variables. How can they reach this conclusion by using two different modem/carrier combinations?

The only way to really tell if the Qualcomm model is being "throttled" is to use the same provider in both models. They should use TMo/AT&T (since they work with both models) and see if the Intel model is really getting slower speeds. Until then, the study is ********.
 
When did they offer one phone for all networks? I don't ever remember them offering that.

Do you remeber the iPhone 4s? It was a true "world phone". The last iPhone before Apple adopted LTE, which led them to create different models for different markets again because of a tremendous amount of LTE bands worldwide. So until the iPhone 4 and since the iPhone 5, we are having different iPhone models for different networks/markets.
 
Not a problem for me. This is the most i get on full bars of LTE in the center of my city lol
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0386.jpg
    IMG_0386.jpg
    57 KB · Views: 294
I hate when companies issue BS non-answers like this:
"Every iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus meets or exceeds all of Apple's wireless performance standards, quality metrics, and reliability testing," Apple spokeswoman Trudy Muller said. "In all of our rigorous lab tests based on wireless industry standards, in thousands of hours of real-world field testing, and in extensive carrier partner testing, the data shows there is no discernible difference in the wireless performance of any of the models."

The statement above does not confirm or deny anything from Cellular Insights. Apple would have been better off not commenting at all. Politicians and little kids answer questions in that manner.

/looks at Jr. with icing on face and crumbs on shirt

ME: "Mustang Jr. Did you eat that piece of cake?"

MJr: "I saw the cake. It was the cake. Cake was it is. Was it what I saw? Yes, I did see it there."

/strangles kid with his own intestines
 
No doubt Apple used the Intel LTE chipsets because they got a sweetheart deal from Intel, who has been desperate to break into Apple's hardware ecosystem. Even saving a single dollar over millions of phones is a huge deal. Tim's gotta maintain that 40% margin yo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xpxp2002
If I could get to 15Mbps I would take that. I used to see it in Orlando...on my iPhone 4S. Haven't seen it once since getting LTE. Orlando, FL. Thanks AT&T.

Anyone else in Orlando? I seriously think (based on travel) that Orlando's AT&T LTE may be the worst of semi-major to major cities in the US.

I'm in the Disney area of Orlando and yes my Att service really fell apart over the last few years. They would always blame it on congestion, but even in the tourist off season my speed was dreadful. During the holidays I'd be lucky to get 2mbps. I switched to T-Mobile back in spetember and usually get between 30-90mbps in the busy areas. The only problem is that's not reliable everywhere. Parts of Kissimmee and eastern Orange County it really drops off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: solodogg
No doubt Apple used the Intel LTE chipsets because they got a sweetheart deal from Intel, who has been desperate to break into Apple's hardware ecosystem. Even saving a single dollar over millions of phones is a huge deal. Tim's gotta maintain that 40% margin yo.

This will be a non-issue once Verizon finally dismantles their CDMA/EVDO network around 2019.

Yes, Sprint will probably still have CDMA in 2019, but who cares about them :cool:
 
Spokesperson Trudy Muller does sound like she understands technology. She just copy and pasted this answer from a file called 'what if someone asked about our different cellular chips'.

Whoops.

my opinion of Apple has dropped precipitously
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menneisyys2
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.