Well, adopting usb3.1typeC didn't take so long...
Although it'll have only 3.0 speed for now.
But the signal is clear; thunderbolt and lightning is going away.
Funny thing, that new adapter for getting hdmi out of typeC costs 10 bucks more than the whole

tv...
- Expandable storage: Apple is probably never going to offer this. FTP, Cloud, whatever is so easy (I run my own little HP MicroServer so never worry about mobile storage). If you need SD - and yes there are users that do - then iPhone isn't for you.
There is a lot of demand for expanding iOS devices storage. That why there's a tons of different devices to handle this: cases with additional memory, sticks with different methods to connect, wireless portable storage and of course many cloud services. All these are just more complicated to use than if the iOS device itself had expandable storage. This might be even the single most hindrance in iOS using experience:
http://uk.businessinsider.com/iphone-storage-data-market-share-2014-12
If you haven't had to empty your iOS device every week when it's getting old, good for you. Maybe this is most effective way for Apple to get people to buy new device. Inserting µSD to iOS device would be as simple as inserting a sim card and every iphone user have managed to accomplish that.
And when you can't predict how much storage you'd need in 2 years to the future, you'll have to buy bigger storage you might not even need. Another way for Apple to get more profits.
- Wireless charging: agree, can't wait for true wireless charging. But as far as I know nobody has a decent mass market solution yet. Just the "charging mats". I hope when Apple release this we don't have to place devices in specific mats. Just anywhere within x metres of the source. We'll see.
Charging mats would be absolutely good enough. You'd just keep the device on the mat when you don't use it. No plugging cords ever.
- matte screen - Not for me, I'll take the occasional reflections and glossy. What I would like is better in sun visibility, but that can be fixed without a matte screen.
Fixing visibility in sun would be a lot easier with real matte screen. Colors would look washed out, but the screen would still be more usable than now.
- Battery numbers? What do they hide - first I've heard of this. But I don't really have any battery issues on the 6.
Ever checked your macbooks battery's health? You simply see how many cycles are used, the original capacity, current max capacity and present capacity. Precise numbers. I can't think any other reason for hiding this info, than trying to avoid customers that would complain their battery wearing down just after year or two.
So Macs compete with nothing?
iPads do compete with something?
If you want a computer with commercial grade software and not Windows, there's no other alternative in general than a mac. This is actually pretty amazing that there's no competitors using same idea than macs; *nix like OS with proprietary GUI on top of it with focus on usability to users with mediocre computer skills.
Ipads are only product in Apple's main product lines that are loosing its market share. So I'd guess that Apple will focus on that in the future. Ipad's size also makes it much more easier to include more ports and card readers etc, than for example iphone. And iphone is selling so good, that Apple doesn't need to add new features quickly to it for a long time.