I just can't get why Apple can't use the option key any more. The only reason is money, I think. This way they make more profits.
I'd very much like to have lightweight laptop with ports and retina. But no.
There are people who like/need ports and those who don't. Why Apple is serving only those who doesn't?
These ports costs only few dollars when embedded and the chipsets already support them. There's no harm if you have ports that you don't use. But there's a lot of harm if you need ports that you don't have.
Other than profis, I can only find a reason, that Apple's chiefs are so insanely obsessed with this perfectionistic need for thinnes, that all reason and logistics are lost. Nobody would care if new MB would be few millimeters thicker to have all three sides full of ports. It would still be the thinnest laptop ever.
You want retina, thin, light and you want ports. Apple have given 3 options which you don't like:
- Reitna MacBook Pro - ports, Retina and higher spec a bit bulkier.
- Air: Cheap, light, lower power and great battery.
- MacBook: Cutting edge (for Apple), expensive, low power (but fine for most average users).
The new MacBook is very intriguing as lots of people are complaining about power and ports - what they should realise is that the same was said about the original Air. And it evolved into a fantastic laptop. As I mentioned earlier I can't wait for the 2nd Gen new MacBook - it will be my next computer (and likely last desktop OS machine).
How about other than just focussing on profits they're releasing a range of products that doesn't meet your need. Of course they need to make some profit. I like their direction -it fits my personal computing needs well (except for the lack of MagSafe!).
Why shouldn't they release a laptop with very few ports for people like me who don't need them? Like I already mentioned less ports, less dust, less things to go wrong and better design.
Again there's no harm for people, who will never upgrade anything, if the ssd or ram is upgradeable.
Yes there is - upgradeable means IMO worse design. My favourite thing about the original iPhone compared to my Nokias, Sony Ericssons, Palms etc.. was that it was completely closed. It felt better built for that reason - no creaky back case, no unnecessary openings.
These "mats" or whatever seems to be good for everybody else than Apple.
http://www.ikea.com/ms/en_US/coming-soon/wireless-charging/index.html
Again, not interested. Everybody used to had crappy swipe fingerprint readers on their laptops. Waste of time as they were rubbish. I'm glad Apple waited for a better solution - Touch ID. I hope they do the same for wireless charging.
Docks don't work with the cases I use. There are no cases with wireless charging that meet my other standards. This is pretty amazing about iOS device ecosystem; all 3rd party products work with Apple's products, but almost none works with each other.
Shame it doesn't fit your needs, but if people thought wireless charging was good -they'd buy it - there would be a good case with it built in, there would be a usable standard.
The reality is it's not that useful in it's current form, and from a standards perspective it's an absolute mess.
I hope Apple does something like Apple Pay - create their own standard and ignore the poor products available.
Again, you wouldn't miss a thing if they offered an option that suits me. They used to do that (matte screens). Now you can choose golden casing, phew...
Mattes screen option - nope I wouldn't lose anything.
But maybe... the majority of users would prefer glossy and accurate over matte and less accurate. Or maybe Apple don't want to fatten their available SKUs (which are already starting to balloon with multiple screen sizes etc).
Gold casing is easy - it doesn't effect the way a product works. Whereas adding a matte screen changes a huge part of the device and would take way more work. Apple decided they don't want to put resources into offering it.
Good for you. But there has to be reason why Apple put that info in AbaoutThisMac->SystemReport->Power. And those who like to monitor those things can. Again, nothing away from you. This is how Apple used to be. You can be a "nerdy", but you don't have to be. Taking this option away, mainly because of short term profits (I think), is making me sad. Even more when you think that Apple is sucking most of the IT industrys profits on the planet, so they could do anything they like. And this is what they like.
I don't think Apple are going to make more sales because that information isn't available on an iPhone. Maybe they used to add it as older batteries were more susceptible to degradation. Maybe you're right and there is big conspiracy at Apple on hiding battery cycle numbers so they can sell more devices.
What you're saying...
- Apple is making bad decision which users don't like.
- But Apple are sucking up most of the industries products.
Wow. Apple must be freaking amazing! If you are right then long term Apple will fail as you can't keep making bad decisions and continue to be successful. If you are wrong, then maybe the decisions aren't that bad - maybe these things don't matter to the majority? And maybe Apple will continue to be successful - although they will be doing things that don't fit your needs.