Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm waiting for true micro led , oled has burn in issues even now , avoid
Someone ran a test on youtube that had an image stuck for thousands of hours and had no burn ins for a samsung oled. Yeah, no human will have their phone stuck to one image for more than a 1000 hours. Burn in issue will be at zero.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: George Dawes
Micro-LED is years away from coming to phones. Too expensive and not to mention they can't make it small enough. The only product that they have now are large TVs.
microLED is essentially still vapourware. I'm starting to wonder if it's going to go the way of SED.
 
Micro-LED is years away from coming to phones. Too expensive and not to mention they can't make it small enough. The only product that they have now are large TVs.

Who’s talking about phones. Apple already has state of the art OLED on the phones. This is about laptops/desktops.
 
OLED will be used on consumer Apple products, mini-LED on prosumer ones. Apple needs HDR across the board, sufficiently bright OLED is a “cheap” way to get there. But it won’t replace miniLED and local dimming any time soon. Next evolutionary step is then micro-LEDs which will replace both.

I don't see this happening. Even with iPhones, which ship 100M+ units a year, Apple sources panels from Samsung and other industry suppliers that generally use very similar tooling for other handset manufacturers that also source OLED screens for their phones. There are economics of scale across the supply chain itself, even if Apple sources the best variant of the OLED panel. Or what was Samsung's best OLED mobile phone panel, last year ;)

The same is not true for micro-LED - it's inferior to OLED, there is no significant adoption in the supply chain outside of a very niche group of chinese TV manufacturers and high end Samsung TVs (which nobody buys).

Apple is going OLED across the board (*edit - expanding to the Macbook Pro / iPad Pro panels, which will have better display characteristics than the consumer OLED panels (which will come later) on non-Pro iPads/Macbook Air). The mini/micro LED experiment hasn't really gone anywhere and is being dropped.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: EugW
I don't see this happening. Even with iPhones, which ship 100M+ units a year, Apple sources panels from Samsung and other industry suppliers that generally use very similar tooling for other handset manufacturers that source OLED screens. There are economics of scale across the supply chain itself, even if Apple sources the best variant of the OLED panel. Or what was Samsung's last OLED panel, last year ;)

The same is not true for micro-LED - it's inferior to OLED, there is no significant adoption in the supply chain outside of a very niche group of chinese TV manufacturers and high end Samsung TVs (which nobody buys).

Apple is going OLED across the board. The mini/micro LED experiment hasn't really gone anywhere and is being dropped.
Yeah, I don't see microLED replacing mini-LED anytime soon. Going to OLED seems to make more sense at least in the foreseeable future. OLED won't hit 1600 nits of course, but it doesn't have to. A high end 32" OLED that can do 1000 nits would be amazing. The main question is if they can achieve 6K at that size. Or 5K at 30". I would be overjoyed to see a pro level Apple 201 ppi 30" 5K OLED HDR1000 display, but I don't think they'll do that. 6K 32" OLED or bust.
 
  • Like
Reactions: icanhazapple
I don't see this happening. Even with iPhones, which ship 100M+ units a year, Apple sources panels from Samsung and other industry suppliers that generally use very similar tooling for other handset manufacturers that also source OLED screens for their phones. There are economics of scale across the supply chain itself, even if Apple sources the best variant of the OLED panel. Or what was Samsung's best OLED mobile phone panel, last year ;)

The same is not true for micro-LED - it's inferior to OLED, there is no significant adoption in the supply chain outside of a very niche group of chinese TV manufacturers and high end Samsung TVs (which nobody buys).

Apple is going OLED across the board (*edit - expanding to the Macbook Pro / iPad Pro panels, which will have better display characteristics than the consumer OLED panels (which will come later) on non-Pro iPads/Macbook Air). The mini/micro LED experiment hasn't really gone anywhere and is being dropped.

Maybe. If they can make large OLED panels with the same characteristics as the ones on the latest pro iPhones, it would be a good thing. I must admit that I remain skeptical. High-quality large OLED panels are currently prohibitively expensive and it’s not like other costs are going down. The question is if Apple can afford to offer OLED across the board.
 
Maybe. If they can make large OLED panels with the same characteristics as the ones on the latest pro iPhones, it would be a good thing. I must admit that I remain skeptical. High-quality large OLED panels are currently prohibitively expensive and it’s not like other costs are going down. The question is if Apple can afford to offer OLED across the board.
High quality high pixel density OLED computer displays are very expensive.
High quality high pixel density microLED computer displays are non-existent, and none are on the horizon either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: icanhazapple
High quality high pixel density OLED computer displays are very expensive.
High quality high pixel density microLED computer displays are non-existent, and none are on the horizon either.

Sure, but folks here talk about Apple replacing their current mini-LED displays with OLED. I’m not sure it’s going to be feasible (cost, volume production) in the near future.
 
I have an LG C2 OLED next to my Pro Display XDR, and 16" miniLED MacBook Pro and the OLED absolutely destroys them both in terms of picture quality when watching films and TV.

If burn in is solved then I can't wait for OLED.
I have 3 65” OLEDs various generations. We watch a lot of sports and not one exhibits a bit of burn in.
If you’re watching mainly news or channels with static information bars then surely a $1600 tv may not be the best fit
 
Mini-LED is a failed attempt to mimic the benefits of OLED. It’s impressive at first blush but there’s only so many times I can look the other way at screen uniformity issues on a display purporting to be aimed at the Pro-minded user. Does the industry know something about OLED that we don’t? Has it over-egged its bold claims about panel life?
 
  • Like
Reactions: George Dawes
The current iPad Pro/Macbook Pro 14/16 display:
SDR brightness: 600 nits max (typical)
XDR brightness: 1,000 nits max full screen, 1,600 nits peak (HDR content only)

Macbook Air M2 display:
500 nits brightness



Oled is a absolutely upgrade for current Macbook Air, is easy to have 500 mites brightness and better display quality. But the question is would Oled be a upgrade for Mini-led display?

I will definitly buy a new Oled Macbook Air but doubt about having a new iPad Pro or Macbook Pro. It seems unlikely to have 1,000 nits or 1600 nites peak brightness.

I think the Apple's sales strategy is applying the OLED on low-end product and keep the Mini-LED for high-end product.
 
In theory, yes. But actually producing a large display that has the qualities (and the volume!) Apple needs is going to be very challenging. Until a suitable technology (micro-LED) is sufficiently matured and production-ready mini-LED local dimming workaround is here to stay.
MicroLED is more than a decade away. The main problem with MiniLEDs is they just look horrible anytime you enter a dim environment which is practically a necessity if you want to enjoy good HDR. No matter how bright a display can get, HDR is only impactful in a dark room and MiniLEDs show a lot of haloing in content in such a scenario.

Heck, I frequently use my iPad in bed at night before turning in and if you have dark mode turn on, it looks awful with white text. It’s glaring on the Apollo Reddit app. I legit think my 2018 iPad Pro looks better than my M1 iPad Pro because the screen is uniformly gray instead of uneven on the M1.

The Tab S8 Ultra I have with an OLED display outclasses both in a dim room.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim Lahey
What are the differences between OLED and miniLED? Asking as a profane.



I think OLED last longer now.

What is your thinking based on?
I think that if OLED was longer lasting than LCD, then because of its colour and battery-saving quality Apple would've made the switch already, not only in small devices.
 
For the OLED side:

OLED - each sub pixel (R, G, or B) is its own oled, the different colors are chemically different and can wear out at different rates.
WOLED - same as OLED but has an additional white oled to make the image brighter, but this also means that bright colors lose saturation.
QD-OLED - replace the W, R, G, and B oleds with just 4 identical "white" OLEDS (I think it's actually blue with a filter), and then use quantum dots to filter out light and set the color of the pixels.

QD-OLED is cool because if you wanted to show a 400 nit blue on a normal OLED you'd need to run the blue pixel at 400 nits, which burns it out quickly. While on a QD-OLED you set the 4 "white" OLEDs to 100 nits each and then use quantum dots to make it blue. This means you can get much brighter and are only putting 1/4th of the load on your OLEDs. Also you don't have the issue of stuff like the blue OLEDs burning out faster than the red and green and destroying your color accuracy.
As far as I know, QD-OLED‘s quantum dot-derived sub pixel colors are still fixed, so dynamically assigning four neighboring subpixels to blue would not be possible.
 
MicroLED is more than a decade away.
That’s true. LCD took decades to replace CRT. OLED took decades to enter the PC market. I don’t think there would be any commercial product featuring microLED in 2020s. Some estimates indicated microLED will be used on smartwatches as early as 2024 but it’s just too optimistic.
 
Apple didn't move to OLED in a long time because these displays degrade faster than LCD. Then why is Apple now considering to switch?
I'm waiting for true micro led , oled has burn in issues even now , avoid
Don't OLED displays still have the problem of a low peak brightness? iPads are often used in bright environments.

The display they’re going to use for Macs will be two-stack tandem and LTPO which increase the longevity.

According to this, it doubles the brightness and quadruples the longevity compared to current OLED:

 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.