Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
There will be big features don't listen to mark gurman or anyone who says that iOS 17 is a minor update it's not.
he is mostly right, why do you think this, we have had zero leaks and if there was anything big we would hear about it
 
There's a difference between a kid learning and a kid putting an app in the wild. If a kid want to just learn, Swift Playgrounds exists. If a kid wants to mess around and build play apps for themselves, they don't need a developer account for that and you can publish to your own iPhone/Mac/whatever. You're only block from using iCloud, payments and a few other things. It's when the kid wants to publish to the store that they have to pay. That's when Apple actually needs to do things, have someone manually check each release for example. I do think $99 a year is a bit steep, $29 for education or free apps that use no accounts and have no IAP, would be more reasonable.
By far the most sensible response on this thread. Others are mostly speculating about a step that we know little about so far, let alone the reasons behind it.
 
I would not be surprised if Apple completely eliminates the public beta program. The public is there to provide good feedback which is to provide improvement and stability. However, Apple doesn’t seem to think that way anymore.

Bottom line: Pay the $99 Developer Fee. That’s what Apple wants.
I mean, the regular releases nowadays don’t feel much different from beta. In ancient times, you’d actually have to pay for the non-beta. ;)
 
Don’t see why anyone should care about this. If they eliminated public betas, sure, but they aren’t. So why does it really matter? Feels like a lot of artificial angst here over nothing.

That said, I agree with those who said it would be nice to have a clearer picture of what apple will do to triage reported issues. I’ve reported some in the past and very few ever get anything and just sit there. And Apple has acknowledged problems with feedback from apps before as well.
 
That said, I agree with those who said it would be nice to have a clearer picture of what apple will do to triage reported issues. I’ve reported some in the past and very few ever get anything and just sit there. And Apple has acknowledged problems with feedback from apps before as well.
I used to report issues to Apple, but I've now been reporting the same bug in iTunes/Music for a decade give or take and nothing has changed, so I don't bother anymore.
 
I would not be surprised if Apple completely eliminates the public beta program. The public is there to provide good feedback which is to provide improvement and stability. However, Apple doesn’t seem to think that way anymore.

Bottom line: Pay the $99 Developer Fee. That’s what Apple wants.

Actually, I suspect the public beta is there to provide pressure on developers earlier to support the upcoming release, or at least create customer pressure for them to evaluate whether their software works on it before public launch.

It is also there specifically to delay installation of beta builds on production hardware on people who do not understand the ramifications of installing betas on production hardware - especially against one's personal iCloud account.

I do find it entertaining that a company that pulled in nearly $400 billion in revenue last year was trying to boost the needle on their services revenue by convincing people to sign up as developers. Huge market for people willing to pay $99/yr and go through identity verfication/tax verification to get on the beta train a month earlier while everything's busted.
 
Last edited:
Exactely.... nothing more to say here. The quality of iOS releases gets worse every year and Apple moves to eliminate public testing. 🤣

Do you have any statistics on the number of quality bug reports that people without developer accounts file against illegally distributed developer betas vs public betas?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: sorgo †
In future iOS releases, Apple says this menu will be the only way to enable developer betas, as profiles will stop working.

This is was news to me, and potentially ruins the iPhone as an enterprise-IT approved device.
 
Apple Moves to Prevent iPhone Users From Getting iOS 17 Developer Beta for Free
Kinda a misleading title. This was already changed with the first beta of iOS/IPadOS 16.4. Sure they have switched from beta profiles being installed to use Apple ID permissions which is easier to manage.

Until now, anyone could easily install iOS developer betas for free by downloading the profiles from websites such as BetaProfiles.dev.
That was changed awhile back when that site was forced to remove iOS/IPadOS Dev beta profiles to install. They still visibly show Public Beta profiles, but that will be rendered moot anyway as you can just sign up on Beta.apple.com wen site for that.

Screenshot 2023-02-19 at 2.40.24 PM.png

com
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Razorpit
May be related to the relatively new Lockdown Mode. There's no way to install configuration profiles and thus preview builds when Lockdown Mode is enabled.
 
These YouTubers need to stop doing new Apple product early review videos. It's nothing but a scripted sales talk from Apple. Sales and marketing at its finest!
It is not just YouTubers, it is Tech websites too. My issue is that I typically fall hard for Apple's Event videos. They really know how to get me excited about the littlest things. I've already made my decision by the end of the event lol.
 
Why does Apple charge developers $99 per year? That is a hurdle for a kid that just creates an app for fun, which could generate a lot of money for Apple.

You can get all the developer tools and documentation, create apps, and distribute them to friends for free.

The $99 really just gives you the ability to publish on the app store.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.