This is nice, but ultimately it would be best to have no SIM at all.
This will happen a few years after the universal sim becomes ubiquitous. That's where Apple wants to go for design and convenience reasons.
This is nice, but ultimately it would be best to have no SIM at all.
Take note, they're only required to unlock phones released on/after Feb 2015. They could easily choose not to unlock the iPhone for domestic use citing "technical" reasons. Pretty stupid excuse but it's worked for them so far.Sprint is supposedly unlocking phones domestically in February.We shall see though Sprint is completely FUBAR
Take note, they're only required to unlock phones released on/after Feb 2015. They could easily choose not to unlock the iPhone for domestic use citing "technical" reasons. Pretty stupid excuse but it's worked for them so far.
Take note, they're only required to unlock phones released on/after Feb 2015. They could easily choose not to unlock the iPhone for domestic use citing "technical" reasons. Pretty stupid excuse but it's worked for them so far.
They can do that with iPhones released before 2015 because the full requirements for the voluntary unlock agreement with the FCC don't take effect until next year. Starting with the iPhone 6s/6s+, Sprint will be required to unlock.I think they've said this already that they're refusing to unlock any iPhones being sold
So true. The same freakin' phone model is released internationally unlocked and that version works just fine on AT&T and T-Mobile (Verizon, too, quite likely if you're fine jumping through some hoops).I wish they were forced to demonstrate the technical reasons. Because we all know there are no real technical reasons they can't unlock the phones