FierceCorgi
macrumors member
I guess someone is paying attention to the pre-orders on the app - I did that and today's "New Music Mix" for me is almost completely classical recordings.
When you buy a used CD, the artist gets zilch. Nada. Butkus. Your “cheaper” is supported by the artists who get nothing from you for their work.I have zero subscriptions with Apple, and I will not. I buy a CDs and have the music I LIKE on my devices.
Better yet I buy a heap of CDs 2nd hand, so my music collection is cheaper than a subscription.
I have a friend who has an album on Spotify, they get paid $0.01 for every 1000 track plays.
No iPadOS version? ...Really? I mean, isn't the iPad the best device for this considering the top models have much better speakers?
- There is no version of Apple Music Classical for iPadOS, making it an iPhone-only app.
I don't quite understand the point of this separate music app. What's preventing Apple from simply integrating the features in the existing Music app? I mean classical music library is already accessible on the regular music app. Why not just add on the additional features instead of making another separate music app?
Give it time. I'm sure it will come. As will, most likely, a macOS one.No iPadOS version? ...Really? I mean, isn't the iPad the best device for this considering the top models have much better speakers?
No iPadOS version? ...Really? I mean, isn't the iPad the best device for this considering the top models have much better speakers?
It should be possible to support across the board, but it only matters if the actual metadata being indexed is consistent enough to be useful. Apple just bought a big consistent chunk of classical metadata. Everything else on Apple Music? Metadata hit or miss, which means search is hit or miss.Because the metadata handling (and therefore, searching music too) in classical music is quite different than other genres. I presume they though it would be more clean and tidy to keep it separate.
So what I'd *hope* is that Apple decides to toss a big chunk of change to getting *all* its metadata up to the Primephonic standard.
It feels shallow, but I'm someone who is pretty lukewarm on classical music (don't dislike, but never seek out) and I'm looking forward to this. Classical music is intimidating to try get into for a layman, and if the app is done right, having a novel way to interact with the genre could make it more approachable.One of the few apps I'm genuinely excited about.
Right now, many are probably scratching their heads wondering 'why,' but I have no doubt that it will become big and have a lot more people talking about and listening to classical music.
It feels shallow, but I'm someone who is pretty lukewarm on classical music (don't dislike, but never seek out) and I'm looking forward to this. Classical music is intimidating to try get into for a layman, and if the app is done right, having a novel way to interact with the genre could make it more approachable.
You’ve got some great discoveries ahead of you. Sometimes you need a certain amount of background to appreciate a piece, or appreciate it better, but nobody knows everything, so enjoy.It feels shallow, but I'm someone who is pretty lukewarm on classical music (don't dislike, but never seek out) and I'm looking forward to this. Classical music is intimidating to try get into for a layman, and if the app is done right, having a novel way to interact with the genre could make it more approachable.
I mean, I'm not that into film scores either, lol. I'm not saying I'm "afraid" of it, but in general it's not easily digestible like a lot of popular genres, and it's a pretty deep rabbit hole to dive into in order to really appreciate it; things like comparing different arrangements or performers of the same piece can give you insight into what makes a passage interesting or impactful.Never understood this. Plenty of people are into film scores since quite a few decades ago, (hell, a young Steven Spielberg collected vinyls of film scores), and the bridge between that and classical music seems natural and a easy one to me. Orchestral instruments are just another kind of instruments, no need to be afraid of them.
Right — if the theme from Jaws gets you, try “Sensemaya” by Revueltas.Never understood this. Plenty of people are into film scores since quite a few decades ago, (hell, a young Steven Spielberg collected vinyls of film scores), and the bridge between that and classical music seems natural and a easy one to me to cross. Orchestral instruments are just another kind of instruments, no need to be afraid of them.
Right — if the theme from Jaws gets you, try “Sensemaya” by Revueltas.
Edit: my favorite bit on the “Jaws” soundtrack is “Promenade: Tourists on the Menu” which is part Haydn and part shark.
Nobody knows everything.Or maybe not, what do I know about it?
It feels shallow, but I'm someone who is pretty lukewarm on classical music (don't dislike, but never seek out) and I'm looking forward to this. Classical music is intimidating to try get into for a layman, and if the app is done right, having a novel way to interact with the genre could make it more approachable.
Nobody knows everything.
Bernstein was the guy who basically put Mahler’s music on the front row, orchestras around the world played a Mahler work in mourning when Bernstein died, and … I don’t know a thing about Mahler. Somehow never got there.
Thank you, and yes I was aware of this, however I am not sure which Apple devices support lossless playback. I believe that none of AirPod series support lossless since they use the BT AAC lossy codec, but there seems some difficulty in finding out what the current Homepods (Jan 2023), original HomePods and HomePod mini support. They may support the 16 bit/44.1kHz (CD quality playback) via a software upgrade but not the higher resolution formats. Since this capability was apparently added with software (the original lossless Apple Music specifically excluded Homepods) it is less than clear which version added it and, hence when. Very confusing and seems quite counter productive. I know I can use my Mac and an external D - A to get high res audio playback (> CD quality, 24 bit/192 kHz) with Apple Lossless. I do not think Airplay supports anything greater than 16 bit/44.1 kHz.You probably already know this, but AirPlay does support lossless at CD quality 16bit/44.1kHz.
![]()
AirPlay - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I got kinda lucky in that my favorite movie when I was young (and still today) had a big pile of Ligeti in the soundtrack, so atonality isn’t a totally hostile environment for me. But the whole point is, don’t be afraid to listen and like what you like, because the ghost of Beethoven WILL NOT stretch an arm out of your headphones and slap you, saying “You’re listening wrong.”I guess it´s all comes down to what one consider popular mainstream music. For example, I love D´angelo work, but I was recently informed that he is not exactly accesible to the common fellow.
😂
I got kinda lucky in that my favorite movie when I was young (and still today) had a big pile of Ligeti in the soundtrack, so atonality isn’t a totally hostile environment for me. But the whole point is, don’t be afraid to listen and like what you like, because the ghost of Beethoven WILL NOT stretch an arm out of your headphones and slap you, saying “You’re listening wrong.”
Another guy landing in a Kubrick movie, thereby causing the celeste to show up in every horror movie score of the past forty years.Completely agree. I had people telling me at one point, something along the lines of: "dont listen to bartok, that is orchestral noise!, and he became one of my favorite composers over time.
😂