Good points.50. Kate Bush - Hounds of Love
49. U2 - The Joshua Tree
48. Beastie Boys - Paul’s Boutique
47. Drake - Take Care
46. Bob Marley and the Wailers - Exodus
45. Bjork - Homogenic
44. Stevie Wonder - Innervisions
43. Talking Heads - Remain in Light
42. Janet Jackson - Control
41. OutKast - Aquemini
Based on the average age for each set of 10 largely falling between the decade of 1988 to 1997, I think the folks that made the list actively tried to avoid having a bunch of older stuff all gathered at the top. I’m not sure if I agree with that decision though. We’ll see what happens in the Top 40 I guess. I mean we’re still missing a lot a huge acts. Led Zeppelin, The Who, Pink Floyd, Bob Dylan, Eric Clapton, Johnny Cash, Van Halen, and of course the Beatles.
Boston’s Boston, Fleetwood Mac’s Rumours, MJ’s Thriller, and Nirvana’s Nevermind seem to be givens to make the list.
Even at one album a piece that would take up the 12 of the last 40 and they seem to be continuing the trend of sprinkling “newer” stuff throughout.
I'm deeply curious about the process that was used. For instance, did they just send out emails to their selected voters (with a Numbers spreadsheet on them), and simply say "make a list of what you consider the Best 100 Albums of All Time"? Or was there a larger list of albums that they were given to choose from? Obviously, there had to be some rules in place (e.g. no compilations/greatest hits/soundtracks, etc.). I do appreciate the effort, but I'm not a big fan of the hip-hop heavy list so far. If you listen to their accompanying shows, the through line is that those records are 'real', 'authentic', 'rough', 'gritty'.
Seems like more prolific artists might be at a disadvantage? For instance, Led Zeppelin's might get votes split across several of their great albums, and end up with few/none at the top?