I guess they're desperate in their attempt to catch up to Spotify in terms of market share.No additional cost. Hell yea
I guess they're desperate in their attempt to catch up to Spotify in terms of market share.No additional cost. Hell yea
Yet another common misconception about “streaming services“; yes, you can “stream”, but you can always download ahead of time and play back locally just like you do with the old music model.Difficult to stream on airplanes. Admittedly not much of an issue for me at the moment with air travel severely restricted but one day it will be a consideration for me again. Difficult to stream in any area with a dodgy mobile network connection and no WiFi. Also not everyone has high or unlimited data caps on their mobile phone plans so there can be cost implications especially if you’re on holiday and would need to use roaming data in a place where it’s extortionately expensive. And finally there’s battery life if you’re out and about. It’s far more power efficient to play from local storage than stream over a network especially a mobile phone network. Good for you that your circumstances never give you any of those issues but there are other people out there who aren’t in your situation. As you might have guessed a lot of my music listening is when travelling, out walking, sitting enjoying the sun outdoors somewhere etc.
I have yet to meet a soul that will listen to music past a certain point, usually the decade that they were a teenager. Regardless, Beethoven isn't going to produce a new composition.
And some people will insist on Kraft Mac ‘n Cheese while travelling in Italy… 🤯And Some people are just miserable
I would think so. Since carplay is just an interface streamed from your phone.I wonder if Carplay supports the lossless audio
Cool, thanks!I’m sure it will be able to process the content. The A8 is capable of doing everything those chips can do. Any limitations would be what they can do with computational audio in that design. It will be interesting to see real world differences.
AM is an incredible value now, despite the severely flawed MacOS app. If support for lossless audio extends to your own purchases – i.e. uploads and matches – that will be the cherry on top and something that is unmatched (no pun intended) by any other music subscription service. Exciting stuff.I am (pleasantly) surprised as I thought Apple would charge extra for this.
Apple Music only:Uhmm... I’m gonna be honest. On one hand, I’ve always loved Spotify, it’s been with me since I was very young. I still remember the girl who invited me to the service. Also, competition is good, and I wouldn’t like to see another monopoly or duopoly like the iOS/Android one. Competition benefits consumers.
But on the other hand, leaving the nostalgia out of the equation, I have to admit that, being an Apple user, nowadays I’d prefer Apple Music over Spotify. Aesthetically for me is much nicer than Spotify, it’s better integrated, it has lyrics... my heart is split between the two services but on the long run, I think if I had to pay for one of those services, I would stick to Apple Music.
However, Spotify still offers a free tier supported by ads, and with that and iTunes Match syncing all my music to the cloud, I have enough (for now). At some point I guess I will migrate my Spotify playlists to Apple Music, even if I lose the matching function of iTunes Match.
I wonder if this new Dolby Atmos feature is only available for Apple Music subscribers or it applies to iTunes Match or iTunes purchased music as well...
No you don’t. As an Apple Music subscriber you can upload/match your music to your heart content.even if I lose the matching function of iTunes Match.
I understand since your listening style is VERY unique. However, the majority of the world isn’t stuck in a frozen era of music in which they refuse to try anything new. So for you buying all your favourites from 1970 and being done makes sense. However, the rest of the world exists in a forward moving momentum and people enjoy trying new music and artists daily thus subscription services are much cheaper than outright purchasing tracks.I would have said otherwise if there was an exception to the rule.
It doesn’t support our own purchases, just for Apple Music -AM is an incredible value now, despite the severely flawed MacOS app. If support for lossless audio extends to your own purchases – i.e. uploads and matches – that will be the cherry on top and something that is unmatched (no pun intended) by any other music subscription service. Exciting stuff.
Some of us have been in the iTunes ecosystem since the beginning, and we amassed impressive collections of songs/albums purchased though the iTunes store back when we were syncing this music to iPods. We don't need to pay $9.99/month to listen to this music; we already paid for it. Also, some people do a substantial amount of listening where wifi may not be readily available (e.g., while traveling or enjoying nature).Why would you spend that much on a few songs when you could get tens of millions more songs for the same price?
I flat out don’t even understand your logic lol, you’re saying that you don’t need new music because you’ll be listening to the same songs for decades, but still buy music every year.
If someone said I could pay $100 for 100 songs or $100 for tens of millions I don’t even know what the debate could be about.
Not true -No you don’t. As an Apple Music subscriber you can upload/match your music to your heart content.
While FLAC / lossless isn't mentioned for HomePod in the latest announcement, the HomePod (OG) is FLAC compatible. Worst case, you can Airplay 2 the CD/Redbook quality lossless to the HomePod. Honestly it would still just be astonishing if it didn't direct stream to it though.There seems to be a lot of misconceptions and questions going around.
For now, Atmos is specifically mentioned for HomePod as well. They don't specifically mention the HomePod for lossless.
...
Let's keep it civil and respect everyone's choices.
if our purchaes match apple music, itll be available nonethelessIt doesn’t support our own purchases, just for Apple Music -
I think your point certainly sounds more logical than using a streaming service. However, when I was only using my own music that I purchased, I noticed something.At most I spend 99 a year on music. I already own all the music I listen too, why would I buy more?
Edit: Apple can get a £100 or so to upgrade all my existing 256 bit music to the highest quality, but not a subscription for the same music I am going to listen to for the next few decades.
Not sure what to make of that, but disappointing if true. Doesn't make sense to me that you would be punished with lower audio quality for listening to your own purchases.It doesn’t support our own purchases, just for Apple Music -
My understanding is, CarPlay already supports lossless audio using ALAC up to 16-bit/48 khz. So regular lossless tracks will play fine, but the high resolution lossless will likely not be supported.I wonder if Carplay supports the lossless audio