I really like Apple Music. As soon as it came out I unsubscribed from Spotify and have been using Apple Music since. No major complaints here.
"Add to end of queue" isn't that much less awkward. (I don't know what Sonos calls it, assuming it has that feature.)
Do you want efficiency? get a cassette tape and a walkman. Take the tape, drop it in and that is it. Apple made technology clumsy and useless.
I tried Apple Music because of the trial and stuck with it because of how easy it was to have access to almost every song ever made. I was never one for paying for streaming music before.I think it is doubtful that Apple Music will ever top Spotify. It just isn't different enough to warrant people switching to it (that is where the users will come from).
Can anyone tell me if it has substantially improved since it launched ?
Haven't tried it since the free trial.
I think you're confusing play next with add to up next. I haven't experienced any of the above.Problem is, 'add to up next' doesn't actually do that. It does three different things depending how you last added some tracks. It either adds the track after the current track and before all the queued tracks or adds it to the end of the queue, or adds it to the end of the last batch of tracks you added but before the tracks you had queued the first time you pressed the button.
Sonos has: Play Next, Add to Queue, Replace Queue. This makes perfect sense.
Good for them, I'm not one of them. I prefer to own my music.
Like the service but have no idea how they made the app so terrible. Like what exactly is 'add to up next' supposed to mean? Why not use plain simple English like the Sonos app does?
I think it is doubtful that Apple Music will ever top Spotify. It just isn't different enough to warrant people switching to it (that is where the users will come from).
Well, the offer and service behind Apple Music is quite promising. Nevertheless I'm surprised that Apple hasn't improved the apps for both OS X and iOS even though acknowledging the average user experience. There's more needed than bugfixing here.
These early numbers from the transition from free 3 months to paid should be taken with a grain of salt. Doubtless a lot of people "accidentally" are now paying for it that didn't intend to.
Regardless, I like my Apple Music quite a bit! And I hope they do grow.
Just because they made 10 million users doesn't mean it's any good. That's just the power of default music app, which the first thing any iOS user will see is "Try Apple Music for free".
If Spotify was part of default music app, it would have 100 million users by now.
Agreed. Internet Explorer was the browser in most widespread use at one time for much the same reason that AM is gaining traction maybe?Just because they made 10 million users doesn't mean it's any good. That's just the power of default music app, which the first thing any iOS user will see is "Try Apple Music for free".
If Spotify was part of default music app, it would have 100 million users by now.
They have. Specially the mobile version.
Apple Music has: Play Next, Add to Up Next. This is simpler and makes more sense to me. I don't even know what "replace queue" means.Problem is, 'add to up next' doesn't actually do that. It does three different things depending how you last added some tracks. It either adds the track after the current track and before all the queued tracks or adds it to the end of the queue, or adds it to the end of the last batch of tracks you added but before the tracks you had queued the first time you pressed the button.
Sonos has: Play Next, Add to Queue, Replace Queue. This makes perfect sense.
I lasted 3 months then canceld. Not worth it for me.Good for them, I'm not one of them. I prefer to own my music.