Three words.... Not enough content. Viewers can probably watch all of the content they have in less than a week or two. Oh, sorry, I thought this was about Apple TV. My bad. : )
...especially when it is "curated" for you. *chuckle*I'm not going to pay Apple $120/year for information I can read for free elsewhere. It's that simple.
Most hilarious reasons anyone could come up with.
Real reasons would be 1)Outdated format 2)No REAL material to hold in hands and put under wobbly table 3) Small amount of content 4) Region locked and no regional news content 5) Free and/or payable alternatives 6) Small target audience. I’m sure abolute majority of people under 35 don’t care about subscribing to news app.
If the news app did pinch to zoom I would have subscribed. That is only reason I don’t because I find layout of some articles difficult to read.
Apple has been struggling to add new subscribers to its Apple News+ service that launched in March, according to a new report from CNBC that cites people familiar with Apple News+.
When Apple News+ debuted, Apple signed on approximately 200,000 subscribers within 48 hours, but has not had luck attracting many new customers. The subscriber count has not "increased materially from its first couple of days," based on information from CNBC's sources.
![]()
Apple News+, which offers up access to magazines and newspapers for $9.99 per month, was promoted at launch, but Apple has not been heavily marketing it since then. Despite this, Apple is said to be committed to improving Apple News for years to come.
Publishers who thought the service would bring in more revenue are "disappointed" with poor sales. Apple takes 50 percent of the revenue from every Apple News+ subscriber, while the rest of the money is doled out to publishers based on the amount of time that subscribers spend reading their content.
One publisher has received between $20,000 and $30,000 per month from Apple News+, which is lower than expected. Another publisher told CNBC that while Apple News+ revenue growth is lower than anticipated, advertising from the free Apple News product has consistently climbed.
A Bloomberg report from earlier today suggested Apple is considering a bundle that would include Apple Music, Apple TV+, and Apple News+ for one monthly price, which could potentially make Apple News+ more appealing because other services would be available alongside it. Such a bundle could be released as early as 2020.
Article Link: Apple News+ Struggling to Get New Subscribers
Yeah, that seems to sum up Apple since Steve Jobs passed. NB: see my signature quote!I think a lot of the services feel forced and created SPECIFICALLY to generate revenue and not because anyone felt the products themselves were any good.
If I could mark pages I see in Chrome to read later in Apple News, I might be more inclined to use it. Maybe it would actually learn what I care about. When I accidentally open it I get content I have no interest in.
I just opened it and these are my top stories:
1. LASIK should be banned
2. 9-year-old graduates college
3. Impeachment is not a fair fight
4. Three cows that vanished months ago show up on an island miles away
HOW IS THIS DIFFERENT THAN FACEBOOK?
View attachment 877115
Three words.... Not enough content. Viewers can probably watch all of the content they have in less than a week or two. Oh, sorry, I thought this was about Apple TV. My bad. : )