Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Apple Says It Has No Plans for Solely ARM-Based or Touchscreen Macs

MacRumors

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,588
39,451



Apple recently invited a small group of reporters to Cupertino for a roundtable discussion about the Mac, and while the conversation was primarily focused on the Mac Pro, Apple also revealed that it currently has no plans for Macs with touchscreens or Macs powered solely by ARM chips, rather than Intel processors.

mac-imac-800x369.jpg

Ina Fried, reporting for Axios:
The company has no plans for touchscreen Macs, or for machines powered solely by the kind of ARM processors used in the iPhone and iPad. However, executives left open the possibility ARM chips could play a broader role as companion processors, something that showed up first with the T1 processor that powers the Touch Bar in the new MacBook Pro.
Click to expand...
Apple marketing chief Phil Schiller aptly said "no" when asked about the prospect of touchscreen Macs in particular.

Matthew Panzarino, reporting for TechCrunch:
It's worth noting that, when asked about a touch display here, in the context of efforts like Microsoft's Surface Studio, Schiller replies "No."

"That's a whole other long discussion we can get into, but suffice it to say, it's not a big need of the Mac Pro customers that we're trying to address," he says. "You mentioned again how we're talking about both the iMac and MacBook -- I do think that we have a two-prong desktop strategy with both iMac and Mac Pro, we think are each going to be important for pro desktops."
Click to expand...
It's not the first time that Schiller or Apple have dismissed the idea of a touchscreen Mac. In November, he said that Apple has tested a touchscreen Mac and "absolutely come away with the belief that it isn't the right thing to do." He even went as far as calling the idea of a touchscreen iMac "absurd."
"Can you imagine a 27-inch iMac where you have to reach over the air to try to touch and do things? That becomes absurd." He also explains that such a move would mean totally redesigning the menu bar for fingers, in a way that would ruin the experience for those using pointer devices like the touch or mouse. "You can't optimize for both," he says. "It's the lowest common denominator thinking."
Click to expand...
Apple design chief Jony Ive has likewise said that a touchscreen Mac would "not be a particularly useful or appropriate application of Multi-Touch."

touch_bar_hero.jpg

For now, it appears the closest we will get to a touchscreen or ARM-based Mac is the latest MacBook Pro, which has a Touch Bar powered by an ARM-based T1 chip as a companion processor. Apple has said one thing and later reversed course in the past, however, so the company's roadmap could change in the future.

Article Link: Apple Says It Has No Plans for Solely ARM-Based or Touchscreen Macs
 
Article Link
https://www.macrumors.com/2017/04/05/apple-no-plans-for-touchscreen-or-arm-based-macs/
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
Well they have tested both. They may not have solid plans for either, although ARM processors in Macs are currently of more interest to them, including ARM based Macs as they are definitely interested in the possibility of exploring that area.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacsRuleOthersDrool and MrUNIMOG
I use a Dell all-in-one at work that has a touchscreen. I dont use it much but its nice to have as I sometimes use it when scrolling a PDF or doing pinch to zoom. Its not catastrophically bad as apple makes it out to be...

Its not something you will use often but its nice to have an option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghost31, Middy.uk, Sandstorm and 22 others
I always hoped they would do something like this patent they filed in 2010. When engaged into the lower mode, the UI would transform to have larger tap targets to be more touch friendly. It would all be bundled into the same binary for apps. This would be nice for graphic artists and illustrators who could use the Apple Pencil on such a display.
6a0120a5580826970c0133f34442aa970b-800wi
 
  • Like
Reactions: TropN, Kristoph, Sandstorm and 31 others
Touch screen Macs would be nice. You don't have to use the touch screen all the time. It is certainly faster than using a mouse or trackpad.

For touch screens to work, the software and hardware has to be designed correctly, which Apple can't or unwilling to do.

Hope Apple don't move to ARM for a while yet, there is really no need.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandstorm, Beachguy and jarrodbcecil
Zaft said:
I use a Dell all-in-one at work that has a touchscreen. I dont use it much but its nice to have as I sometimes use it when scrolling a PDF or doing pinch to zoom. Its not catastrophically bad as apple makes it out to be...

Its not something you will use often but its nice to have an option.
Click to expand...

Yes, what you're saying seems to be the consensus among users. And that's a problem because it's a lot of effort/cost to implement for so little return.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Prime Mover, Rafamrqs1, VMMan and 15 others
Stella said:
Times change. Look at iPad. Blank statements like that are often proven incorrect.

That was a sales tactic to convenience people they didn't need a stylus..
Click to expand...
my point, the same might happen with touch screen Mac in the future
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandstorm
Zaft said:
I use a Dell all-in-one at work that has a touchscreen. I dont use it much but its nice to have as I sometimes use it when scrolling a PDF or doing pinch to zoom.
Click to expand...

The thing is, the multi-touch trackpad is already great for those uses.

I know the trackpad doesn't do everything that a touch screen does, but after the touch bar came out last year I'm now betting that Apple will put an LCD screen under the trackpad long before they put touch in a monitor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TropN, Janichsan, dmi and 17 others
I was always 100% anti-touchscreen when it came to Macs. I still am, at least with iMacs. But I'm starting to wonder if it might be a wise decision to release at least one MBP variation with a touchscreen? I wouldn't need one but there are probably millions of Windows users out there teetering on the edge of switching to Mac, and that might be the final little nudge they need.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandstorm, fourthtunz and SteveJobzniak
Zaft said:
Its not something you will use often but its nice to have an option.
Click to expand...
What if there were two identical MacBooks, one with touchscreen and one without, and the touchscreen version cost +$200. Would you buy that version just for the "nice to have" option? What's the price point where it's worth it? Just curious.

Personally, I think it'd be easier for them to rework iOS on the iPad Pro into a suitable hybrid than it would be to rework OSX into a suitable hybrid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dmi, AirunJae, gaximus and 3 others
Stella said:
Times change. Look at iPad. Blank statements like that are often proven incorrect.

That was a sales tactic to convenience people they didn't need a stylus.. SJ was good at sales / marketing tactics.
Click to expand...

He was talking about phones, not a tablet computer. And Apple primarily markets the pencil for specific cases like scripting, drawing and painting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: milo, gvortex, mburkhard and 6 others
I like this uncharacteristic honesty from Apple. I've got both a MBP and a small Asus I use for astrophotography which is a touch screen foldable laptop. In the end I don't think touch on a screen is super duper useful overall. Handy at times but not providing great utility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: milo, Jamalien, valleian and 4 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back