Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
did you only read the last word? Not in Germany. I am not talking about globally. The sale of it is banned here
Does Germany ban Facebook or any other social media platforms? Or is there something specific to the Quest hardware that it is banning?
 
Does Germany ban Facebook or any other social media platforms? Or is there something specific to the Quest hardware that it is banning?

Something to do with requiring a Facebook Login to use it and FB fighting with the local anti trust division over privacy concerns so FB was like "well F this, then we will just not sell it there"
 
Something to do with requiring a Facebook Login to use it and FB fighting with the local anti trust division over privacy concerns so FB was like "well F this, then we will just not sell it there"
Good for Germany! I had to make a Facebook account to use the Quest 2. Facebook already had my info as I bought the original Oculus Rift so they had my purchase details and info. My Facebook account has zero friends and zero activity, just the barebones to allow me to use the Quest 2. Everything is set to private on it as well so they are not getting anything from me outside of what I play and use in VR. The Facebook requirement thing is supposed to be removed soon.
 
Wasn’t Roblox one of the first to bring up the “metaverse”? Didn’t they imagine people walking around virtually together and playing games with each other? Sort of one huge lobby for all of the games on Roblox currently? Interesting they’re absent from this while it seems like these other companies are running with what might have been their idea.
 
Because the “meta verse” is a poisonous scam.

The way companies like Facebook are doing it, they collect every piece of biometric data even what your eyes look at.

The way these idiots are already testing it, their virtual worlds are already full of:

- racism
- sexual harassment
- adult enactments in front of underage people
- scams
- users asked to download malware

It’s impossible to moderate.

Apple hates chaos systems where users are harmed.




 
  • Like
Reactions: Kengineer
I still don’t get what that even means. I understand my elderly parents now. Without knowing, you are suddenly out of the loop with technology 😅

I guess it’s like putting on a helmet and then u walk around in a virtual reality. Sort of like instead of sending „text bubbles“ to other people, it’s going to be „face to face“? Is the technology even there yet? I expect it to look like those badly rendered Memojis or whatever on Nintendo Switch Online.

I would be interested once those virtual settings look as pretty as a Pixar movie. Imagine visiting the place of „Luca“ or Pandora of Avatar. Not Super Mario World N64
It's not that far away. If you check out Half-Life Alyx, you can see the quality of the graphics, and it's improving all the time. As the technology gets smaller, it will be adopted more quickly.
Whether it's a good or bad thing however, is open for debate.
 
Because the “meta verse” is a poisonous scam.

The way companies like Facebook are doing it, they collect every piece of biometric data even what your eyes look at.

The way these idiots are already testing it, their virtual worlds are already full of:

- racism
- sexual harassment
- adult enactments in front of underage people
- scams
- users asked to download malware

It’s impossible to moderate.

Apple hates chaos systems where users are harmed.




Yeah we should put a stop to that and anything like it.... or wait, you literally just described the internet and all social media today.

No eye tracking in the Quest 2, that will need some new hardware for that, but it is coming with the next release.

Are you using VR at all in any social way? The only place I have seen what you describe is in VRChat, which I agree is chaos. Here is the thing, you don't have to use it, and parents should be monitoring their kids and the content they consume. Yes I know, that is hard.... parenting is not supposed to be easy and tech and the internet are really not must haves to have a happy life.
Wasn’t Roblox one of the first to bring up the “metaverse”? Didn’t they imagine people walking around virtually together and playing games with each other? Sort of one huge lobby for all of the games on Roblox currently? Interesting they’re absent from this while it seems like these other companies are running with what might have been their idea.
There is a great app called RecRoom, recently discovered it with some friends. It is on every device, not just VR. Super fun stuff to do as a group. It has become a highlight in VR, playing out fun quick quests to bowling, golf or dodge ball, among other things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeadingHeat
The fact that Sony, Meta and MS all felt it was in their best interests to join but not Apple is interesting.

Have Apple ever said the word "metaverse" in any public statement? Maybe they think the whole concept is horsesh**, which at this point, is an understandable position to take.
horseshoe ?
 
Apple should not get within a 1000 miles of this evil company called Facebook/Meta. ..I still believe that humanity will wake up one day and Facebook/Meta and the likes will all be extinct...RIP Steve, thanks Tim for still keeping Apple's commitment to stay at the "intersection of technology and the humanity"!
 
Last edited:
I suspect Apple's approach to AR/VR will be far different than that of the Meta group.

No need to be associated with them and their baggage.
 
Ensuring the point of entry is as frictionless as possible for 3rd parties to join/support/help establish your new ecosystem, via standardization, is smart. I can see why it would be in Meta’s best interest to do so. Problem is, they’ve had devices out for how many years without this standardization? Why not launch with these partnerships and standards in place? Would make for a more powerful stance out of the gate. With an Apple keynote looming, these efforts feel a bit too late.

Not since the ‘07 iPhone keynote have I been as interested in what Apple has up their sleeve regarding HUD. And not because I think a HUD is as in-demand as the iPhone was in ‘07 (it’s not, not even close), but more because I do think it will take a new, seemingly niche and confusing market and give it relevance and clarity for the masses in a way not yet seen. And from what many are saying here, not thought possible. I suspect many of the nay-sayers will find themselves in the pre-order queue with the rest of us who are curious about such things.

I have to believe Apple already has partners developing apps for their ecosystem under strict NDAs. And at launch, those partnerships will be revealed (likely toward the end of the keynote as a way of saying that they’re serious and this is real), as well as a new mixed-reality standardization protocol with some big name partners already signed on. Apple has the benefit of a passionate and massive user base. They know they’ll recoup R&D with this first wave of early adopters. And that though the success of their first iteration, those vendors not yet signed on will be falling over themselves to get in the game.

Regardless of how any of the above plays out, or not, the very last thing humanity need is standardizing anything Meta. I have zero interest in anything they’re doing/planning on any level. And I’m not the only one who feels the same.

Should be interesting to watch unfold.
 
The point of this I believe is to have standards so there are seamless entry points to experiences and games. Like Ready player one. It's possible that this could happen with multiple game engines Services / devices. This is a good thing.

I am 99% sure that Apple are holding their cards close to their chest as I am sure they will even say to those group at the moment "VR/AR headset - Nope. No idea what you are talking about - wink wink"
 
Any standards body that includes Meta deserves to be shunned. This is the most promising thing I've read about Apple's AR work in months.
 
Well. I suspect it's purely as they have not announced a headset / device yet. And Joining would mean they are saying they have one in the pipeline. As we know apple are super secretive about this stuff.
Or they want a proprietary setup that won't fit into what the other companies are working on together.
 
I don’t think Apple’s non-participation is terribly surprising. It seems like Apple’s VR plans are independent from the Metaverse idea. This seems to be for the metaverse what the W3C (and the IETF) are for the Internet/WWW. I’m not sure Apple’s really interested in the whole federated VR global namespace thing Facebook is trying to do, so it doesn’t make sense for them to participate in a forum meant to promote interoperability within the federated Metaverse idea.

In a certain sense, all this Metaverse business is just an extension to what Facebook was/is trying to do with Internet.org, and because Facebook desperately wants to be something more than that company that owns those social networks. They want to be something more foundational to net infrastructure instead of being one app that runs on the Internet and could be displaced by the next startup (who could easily do to Facebook what Facebook did to MySpace).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.