Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Beats headphones are great if you are the one selling them. Beats was a great acquisition for a measly $3 billion. Now that they will be NBA sponsors they will make Apple another mountain of cash. Anybody that can't see the bigger picture and dismisses Beats because of their personal preference lacks vision.

Beats make shareholders happy. Anybody that hates on Beats probably understands sound quality more so than business.
 
Now that I think of it, the Apple In-Ears I had in 2012 were actually quite good for their price.

Beats headphones are great if you are the one selling them. Beats was a great acquisition for a measly $3 billion. Now that they will be NBA sponsors they will make Apple another mountain of cash. Anybody that can't see the bigger picture and dismisses Beats because of their personal preference lacks vision.

Beats make shareholders happy. Anybody that hates on Beats probably understands sound quality more so than business.

Yes they’re a very sound (heh) business case but I can dream with phones that have both great connectivity and sound.
 
It would help if everyone arguing "X brand sounds better than Y brand" included what type of music they are listening to.

A common argument against Beats is that they are tuned for bass heavy rap and hip-hop music. Is there any truth to that?

By the same token, Airpods might be tuned specifically for the music that Jony Ive prefers to listen to, in the same way that he had the Airpods molded to his own ears and said "screw everyone else" :D
 
Last edited:
Most of the arguments about Beats are coming from back when they were manufactured and developed by Monster. It was back then the music was crazy over-tuned for bass and they put in led to make them feel more heavy and premium etc.. And the overall build-quality was subpar.

Since then the products have improved with each generation, but people are still complaining and acting like the products are just the same as they were the first time around. It's like complaining about the Apple TV 4K being bad because the Apple TV Gen.2 was less than stellar. Or complaining about the Apple Watch having fiddly battery life because of the Apple Watch Series 0 even though we are at Series 3 now with much improved battery life.

This is quite common on the Internet. People are clinging onto old outdated arguments and what they consider "facts" and they keep spewing them all over the Internet without any real knowledge or experience with the newer generation of products.

I'm not saying the Beats lineup is the best one out there, it sure isn't but it's not even close to being as bad as people keep on telling themselves and everyone else. The products have improved a bunch over the years and the Beats Solo3 and Beats Studio3 Wireless are not bad headphones at all.

I currently own the B&O BeoPlay H9i and Beats Studio3 Wireless, and I have previously owned a bunch of wireless headphones. I had the Beats Studio2 Wireless, Bose QC35 (rev1), B&O BeoPlay H7, B&O BeoPlay H8, B&O BeoPlay H9, Sony WH-1000XM2 and I also own the Westone 4R and Shure SE846 IEM's. And I use Apple AirPods at work. And I have also tested the B&W P7 and PX.

In terms of overall audio quality the Beats Studio3 Wireless is not great compared to various B&O BeoPlay's and B&W, or the IEM's but they are not bad either. The sound is good, but the soundstage is narrow. Great for spoken word, but feels constrained in terms of a lot of music genres. But they do have competitive active noise cancellation, they are not onpar with the Bose QC35 and Sony WH-1000XM2 but they are not far behind. But they give the benefit of better battery life and all the benefits of featuring the Apple W1-chip which is the sole reason why I have kept them while I have got rid of many of the others.

I still prefer my B&O BeoPlay H9i's when sound quality is all that matters, there is no doubt about that. But when commuting and pure convenience is most important I prefer the Beats Studio3 Wireless because of the battery life, the ease of use provided by the Apple W1-chip and the fact that they feature narrower soundstage which is preferable when commuting as it makes it easier to listen to podcasts and spoken word content in noisy environments, they have great ANC, they are comfortable to wear and they have a decent microphone for calls.

The last part is a something almost everything else lacks completely. The microphone on the BeoPlay H7, H8, H9, B&W P7, PX and the microphone on the Bose QC35 and Sony WH-1000XM2 are complete garbage. Most of them doesn't have any half-decent quality to them at all and the few that does feature half-decent voice quality have zero form of isolation so they pick up a insane amount of background noise so unless you are sitting in a dead silent room they are still useless as the ones you are calling will be complaining about constant interruptive background noise during calls.

The Apple AirPods are GREAT for calling, the microphones are stellar compared to the rest but also the Beats Studio3 Wireless features microphones that are far beyond what the others provide.


It's not always all about sound quality. It's more about providing the perfect package in terms of sound quality, convenience (battery life, connectivity, ease of use), microphone, noise isolation/cancellation, comfort etc.. And Beats, especially the Beats Studio3 Wireless is still one of the better options out there for Apple users.

But people will keep on complaining about Beats like there is no tomorrow..
 
  • Like
Reactions: the johnmc
I'd love to see a new version of AirPods in-ear, would buy them instantly.
As for Beats I'm really happy with my BeatsX and don't need to upgrade any of my headphones so I don't care about Beats stuff not making to the event.
I was looking for bluetooth headphones a few weeks ago for work, and was thinking about going for the BeatsX because of good iOS integration, above average battery life and supposedly not-horrible-sound quality.
But oh boy did all the Amazon reviews turn me off. Apparently the fault rate after half a year of use is damn high (and it wasn’t like just a few < 3 stars reviews, haven’t seen this many complaints on other headphones in that price range).

Ended up going for Sennheiser in the end. Shame really, I wouldn’t have minded the above perks and the elastic build.
 
In addition to in-ear for fit and noise isolation, my wishlist also includes better (non-voice/Siri) volume control.

One thing I love about my BeatsX is having a physical button to control the volume.
I have an Apple Watch so I could adjust the volume on my wrist without taking the phone out of my pocket if I had AirPods, as I'd never use Siri.
 
They're fine as is, so are AirPods. There is really no reason to introduce new anything in that department.
 
Nothing for Beats.... It's all 'battin down' da' hatches on this keynote'

Apple's pushing for their Airpods anyway. And i reckon that will be a front runner now, Beats comes second.

If Beats takes over, and Apple pushes updating Airpods further into the distance, hat would be a shock... Apple designs them, so naturally they would be first always, as lacking on anything in that would suggest "Apple doesn't care about their product they developed."
 
any rumours around other colours for airpods?

And no issue buying from apple and returning if you're simply not comfortable with how they fit?
 
Beats headphones are great if you are the one selling them. Beats was a great acquisition for a measly $3 billion. Now that they will be NBA sponsors they will make Apple another mountain of cash. Anybody that can't see the bigger picture and dismisses Beats because of their personal preference lacks vision.

Beats make shareholders happy. Anybody that hates on Beats probably understands sound quality more so than business.

Agree with this but there is a more personal angle as well - Beats hardware is designed by Ammunition in SF who is owned by Robert Brunner the guy who established the Industrial design Group at Apple and hired Jony Ive and left to start Ammunition. Also one of the product designers on the Beats account is a Victoria Slaker who is married to Richard Howarth who is one of the key lieutenants of Jony Ive and took over the IDG when Jony decided he wanted to be an architect and consult on the Apple park project. So there is a lot of personal ties here in terms the people involved between 3 companies and the strategy Apple wants to carry out wether it be a slow and steady design transition from beats to apple and dissolve beats, or make the most of the marketing and the margins, don't upgrade the beats hardware and innovate the apple product line and dissolve beats - or upgrade both line simultaneously and its a win/win
 
Why don't they make Beats headphones in colors that match our favorite and most popular Watch bands?

Just wondering.
 
They're fine as is, so are AirPods. There is really no reason to introduce new anything in that department.

Next Beats released are going to be NBA team colors and logos. For the person worrying about matching watchbands don't worry I am sure it will happen at that point.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.