Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Maybe we need a dedicated Markdown keyboard for iOS/iPadOS, with [], (), !, #, etc. readily available?
Nah, add a row of buttons above the keyboard for Bold, Italics, Link, Heading, etc., that insert the appropriate characters for you, but with prompts (just like how, here on MacRumors, you can hit Cmd-K to insert a link and it'll prompt you for a URL to attach to the currently selected text). Display it and store it as Markdown, but let people use slightly more abstract constructs for entering that text. Obsidian does this really well, Drafts has a Markdown toolbar you can page in, and the Apollo app for Reddit handled this perfectly, before it went away.
 
This is quite accurate...
Hilarious, but missing the point that it's a matter of using the right tool for the job. Markdown's niche is that it looks like casual text formatting conventions that predate the internet, and is easily human readable without knowing anything about it (lists look like lists, headings look kinda like headings, you'd probably guess that a word surrounded by stars or underscores was being emphasized). It's great for small documents, but no one (okay very few people) would suggest writing book length manuscripts or scientific papers in it. It's tremendously effective for note taking, reply writing, and other small tasks.
 
Merge Notes and TextEdit. Then get rid of TextEdit.
TextEdit works with named files in arbitrary folders and works with multiple file types (plain text, rich text, etc.). Notes works with a database full of unnamed entries (it'll show you the note's first line in bold, but it's not a unique name, just the first line of the note). I don't see the two ever merging.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikeDr206
This is the main reason I don't actively use the Notes app - it's everywhere, and it syncs nicely, and it supports some nice formatting and integrations with other Apple apps, but to a large extent it can only do what Apple decides to take the time to make it do.

With Obsidian (my Markdown tool of choice), I have an enormous amount of control over how it does things (there's a whole community plugin system), and I can easily get access to all the data on macOS, as a directory tree full of Markdown-formatted files - I can even edit the files directly with MacVim, and Obsidian will see the changes and immediately sync them to my iPhone and iPad (and vice versa). And from MacVim I have access to any command or script I want to write to process the files and text in a wide variety of ways.
Totally. When writing was a bigger part of my career, I used iA Writer and Obsidian as knowledge management and where I would work on all writing except for final drafts. The fact that I could point iA Writer at my Obsidian vault and access everything without having to sync and wait and worry about issues was amazing.

My work no longer involves much writing and so I’ve since switched to Notes. I can get by fine with its limitations, but I’d love to have the option to access my Notes from other apps.
 
Genuine question. (And not trolling I promise.)

Can someone explain to this muggle what’s so useful about markdown? I live in MS Office, so I tend to find markdown annoying rather than useful. In fact, I use ChatGPT to convert markdown to rich text when I come across it.
Most people who write code for a living have picked up Markdown along the way. Once you know the syntax, being able to format as you type is faster than using a rich text editor’s keyboard shortcuts or UI.

Markdown is very simple and readable by machines and humans alike.

If it ends up in Apple Notes, I expect it will be disable-able. It’s not useful for everyone.
 
Using asterisks, lines and # signs to indicate formatting rules has existed in word processors since the 1980's. This was not an invention but a classic something old is new again.
Yeah, I read the article he wrote tonight. Created is probably a better term.
 
I hope Apple will add markdown support to iMessage as well (“>” citations please!?). This is one of the features I love about WhatsApp.
 
Hilarious, but missing the point that it's a matter of using the right tool for the job. Markdown's niche is that it looks like casual text formatting conventions that predate the internet, and is easily human readable without knowing anything about it (lists look like lists, headings look kinda like headings, you'd probably guess that a word surrounded by stars or underscores was being emphasized). It's great for small documents, but no one (okay very few people) would suggest writing book length manuscripts or scientific papers in it. It's tremendously effective for note taking, reply writing, and other small tasks.

I disagree. It's not very good for anything. It's very difficult to parse, it is not entirely standardised, seems to have weird extensions all over the place, has terrible embedding and image support and just doesn't work for a lot of things at all (letters, email comms for example). It also has no structure outside the document itself other than naive hyperlinking which doesn't work anywhere other than the destination you upload it to. That is usually github I note with md aficionados but it turns out that isn't a thing in most places. In fact in some places we're not allowed to use github or anything equivalent for security reasons.

As for people writing scientific papers in markdown, this does actually happen to some naive people who think they know better. But the problem is that the community doesn't use it. So by the time it gets to the poor sods who have to typeset it before publishing, it all goes back to LaTeX. You get even more grumbling from the typesetters than you do shipping a completely screwed up MS word document with a million annotations in it from a social scientist who got kicked in the head by a horse. They have to work out what stack of crap you've used to get a wobbly document out first and then try and get the information into something more civilised.

I work with two entire groups of people (commercial and academic) and the thing runs out of steam very quickly indeed every single time to the point there's a near org-wide ban of it now.

Using your use cases above...
  1. Note taking. Actually a lot of this goes on iPads now or even paper. One of our lead engineers has a physical notebook and a pen. This is after years of trying to use OneNote, Goodnotes etc. On the academic side, thread bound physical notebooks are still very much a thing in mathematics and engineering because when it comes to representing arbitrary information and diagrams, things like markdown become instantly useless. No one is going to sit there and type out MathML, LaTeX etc when you can just write it. iPads with Goodnotes (or Noteful in my case) are used regularly but that hasn't phased out paper.
  2. Reply writing. We mostly use email for this, and there is no markdown support in email. In fact a lot of the time we email each other PDFs with scanned hand written notes or pdfs from goodnotes or link to O365 for draft technical documentation (which sucks but at least everyone can use it).
  3. Other small tasks. I use Apple Notes for semi structured information. Things like recipes, trip planning or writing the faculty WiFi password down. That has nice things like checkable, sortable lists which again are not possible in any reasonable form in markdown.
Anyway enough of that. Generally it's just not very useful and runs out of steam faster than anything else. Of course that's because it's written by software engineers (I occasionally cross into that) who mostly seem to be incapable of reasoning about anything outside of their domain.
 
Gruber's own take:


...But that’s why I think Apple Notes’s use of hashtags, rather than real tokenized tags like in the Finder, was an enormous mistake on Apple’s part...

Really? People got used to hashtags (X/Twitter, etc.) because they're fast, simple and easy to use (no mouse or magic keyboard shortcuts required like for "real" tags). I can't believe what I read (especially that I just hate current formatting feature of Notes).

BTW. "#" is already used in Notes for hashtags. It conflicts with Markdown syntax where it's used alternative heading, doesn't it?
 
Markdown implementations were a bit buggy and development had stalled, and so a new, more stricter specification called CommonMark evolved.


Well precisely that. I remember the Commmark was originally another name with Markdown in its name but John Gruber said not to use that name without his permission.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
No, because the Markdown usage is one or more # followed by a single space, like

# Title

Spaces are not allowed in Notes hashtags.
Ok. You're technically right. But it seems to be too confusing for average user. I, sadly, personally don't believe in markdown being implemented in Notes (contrary to export, which is different story). It's so against Apple philosophy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: splifingate
Ok. You're technically right. But it seems to be too confusing for average user. I, sadly, personally don't believe in markdown being implemented in Notes (contrary to export, which is different story). It's so against Apple philosophy.

Definitely! I see *.md exclusively as an Export solution.

I kinda enjoy Notes just as it is (at least on the Desktop).
 
  • Like
Reactions: ypl
I disagree. It's not very good for anything.
If that was the case it wouldn't been as ubiquitous as it is. It is useful because of the low bar of entry. It is like the post-it note you tack to the side of your desk just to jot something temporarily, or the napkin at the meeting (and neither are technically good at anything, but the perfect solution in those situations).

People tend to want to create elaborate standards that have all the buzzwords of interoperability and features, but as soon as that happens you require training and support, which is not useful if that is not an option. On the other hand if your workflow is becoming a huge stack of napkins and post-it notes, then maybe it is time to consider if that is actually the route to go.

I will say that the use in GitHub has made a certain defined subset of it a standard, which works very well for the text-documentations in the projects. Another popular venue is Jupyter, which has become huge in scientific programming. The same seems to be carried over to the structured output from most LLM's, and you can enter and get back better formatted text. I do like that the possibility to embed simpler "latex"-style equation, figures and other mathematical structures have become somewhat canonical, because it is so much easier to parse than handwritten scribbles.

Any attempts to create more "advanced" features for markdown, should however be tossed to the bottom of the bottomless pit, we don't need eg. Javascript support to create another HTML standard that is itself already way above its pay-grade. It is not another version of latex and should not have 243561 different packages to render fancy letters.

But back to the topic, i don't think that this will be a way to write with markdown directly into Apple Notes (it is not a plain-text editor and i don't see why Apple would want it to become one), but rather to export in the format and import or paste into your notes something already formatted with markdown.
 
I disagree. It's not very good for anything.
You're not listening very carefully, it seems. I get that it doesn't fit for your situation. That doesn't mean that it's ill-suited for everyone else's situation. My whole point was that it's useful in some situations. You started off by disagreeing with that full-stop. Sounds like you want to stamp out Markdown for everyone because it doesn't work well for you.

It's very difficult to parse, it is not entirely standardised, seems to have weird extensions all over the place, has terrible embedding and image support and just doesn't work for a lot of things at all (letters, email comms for example). It also has no structure outside the document itself other than naive hyperlinking which doesn't work anywhere other than the destination you upload it to.
The fact that there are parsers for Markdown available for nearly every programming language on the planet would seem to contradict your first statement. And English is also not entirely standardized and has weird extensions all over the place (slang, dialects, specializations), yet we continue to use it quite beneficially to communicate, millions of times a day - would you argue in favor of getting rid of English, because it's not standardized?

(As far as standardization goes, lots of Markdown implementations these days support the CommonMark standard.)

I have used Markdown numerous times for email messages where I wanted particular formatting, because WYSIWYG editors tend to be sloppy and hard to control - I'll write the Markdown-formatted text in a suitable tool (e.g. Drafts or MacVim, depending on how involved it is), and then copy it out as Rich Text and paste it into Mail, without having to mess around with the target app's WYSIWYG formatting controls.

As far as structure goes, one of my most common uses for Markdown is writing all manner of notes for myself in Obsidian, which has a very rich system for Wiki-style linking between notes and to specific points in notes. It also supports MathJax and LaTeX for formula writing, for what it's worth, though I don't make use of that, and has a built-in canvas system for drawings, along with a well-regarded extension (Excalidraw) for more elaborate drawing.

As for people writing scientific papers in markdown, this does actually happen to some naive people who think they know better.
I'm glad to see that we both agree that people should not be trying to write scientific papers in Markdown. Again, it's a tool that has a niche, and scientific papers and such are generally well outside of that niche. Last I checked, LaTeX was still the standard there. You can run Markdown through Pandoc to get at least a start on the equivalent LaTeX document, if someone is foolish enough to try to write such a thing in Markdown.

Note taking. Actually a lot of this goes on iPads now or even paper. One of our lead engineers has a physical notebook and a pen. This is after years of trying to use OneNote, Goodnotes etc. On the academic side, thread bound physical notebooks are still very much a thing in mathematics and engineering because when it comes to representing arbitrary information and diagrams, things like markdown become instantly useless. No one is going to sit there and type out MathML, LaTeX etc when you can just write it. iPads with Goodnotes (or Noteful in my case) are used regularly but that hasn't phased out paper.
Note taking on paper is downright dangerous - because there is no backup, no easy duplication, no portability, and no search-ability. Lose your notebook and hundreds/thousands of hours worth of notetaking could be gone forever. If you want to make a copy of something for someone, you're what, reduced to standing in front of a copy machine for a while? Or photographing the pages? Or awkwardly scanning the pages of a notebook 1-2 at a time on a flatbed scanner? (And what if there's something else on the page you don't care to share?) And if you leave the notebook in one place, you have zero access to it in another place - if I think of something to look up, or modify, when I'm away from my Mac, I just take out my iPhone, open the Obsidian app and I have complete access to all the same Markdown-formatted notes that are on my Mac, fully synced between the two (and my iPad as well). Similarly, if I want to send someone a note, it's a simple matter of copying and pasting, not scanning pages out of a paper notebook. And I can find anything in thousands of notes in a couple seconds, with a simple search query - paper can't do that, especially if you have a large stack of paper notebooks (and considering that you may be searching because the item you seek was written down in an unexpected place).

You're attacking Markdown for not being able to do arbitrary diagrams and such - it's like attacking a car for being a very ineffective submarine - sure, but that doesn't mean cars have no use. Despite this, there are people who employ Obsidian quite effectively for note taking involving diagrams and formulas and such, as it has a wide variety of extensions for these (it's not something I do, but there are people using it quite enthusiastically this way, who are very happy with the results). Something like GoodNotes or Notability, on an iPad, is often much more suitable for quickly taking down information that involves diagrams and formulas and such, and it's way better than paper for all the reasons noted above, primarily backup.

Reply writing. We mostly use email for this, and there is no markdown support in email. In fact a lot of the time we email each other PDFs with scanned hand written notes or pdfs from goodnotes or link to O365 for draft technical documentation (which sucks but at least everyone can use it).
As mentioned, I happily use Markdown for composing email responses, when the occasion warrants it, and translate to rich text to paste into email. You make it sound like there is an unpassable wall here - quite the opposite, if it suits you. I have frequently done this in cases where the email I'm composing draws from text that I already have in Markdown format. (I should point out that reply writing also meant on Reddit, where everything is fundamentally Markdown.)

Other small tasks. I use Apple Notes for semi structured information. Things like recipes, trip planning or writing the faculty WiFi password down. That has nice things like checkable, sortable lists which again are not possible in any reasonable form in markdown.
I use Markdown (mainly in Obsidian but also for a lot of other random notes where it's simply a good convention for adding information) for all manner of small tasks.

I avoid Apple Notes like the plague, because the import/export capabilities are severely lacking, and there's no good interface for working with it from other tools (on my Mac I can easily access all my notes in Obsidian directly from the filesystem using all sorts scripts and tools, plus Obsidian offers thousands of plugins to do all sorts of things, from the mundane to the esoteric) - whatever Apple provides for Notes, that's what you get (and all you get). Also, it suffers from the usual WYSIWYG slop - is that a bold space or a regular space between those words? who knows? - after a bunch of formatting revisions over time, you have only a vague idea of what your text looks like, not what characters and formatting are actually in the file - I much prefer the precision of Markdown (or, frankly, any other text-based markup, but Markdown is simplest) in this situation.

As far as things like checklists go, I use them in Obsidian all the time (it supports that common extension to Markdown), and if I want sorting, a keypress takes me out to MacVim where I can rearrange/transmogrify the text of a Markdown-formatted Obsidian note in any arbitrary way I want (running a section of a file through sort(1) is a common thing to do). Your "not possible in any reasonable form of Markdown" falls flat, plus you're conflating a markup language / file format with an app (Apple Notes) - trying to compare apples and oranges. Oh, and I never write down passwords outside of a password manager.

Generally it's just not very useful ...
That's an odd thing to say to a bunch of people who are using it very effectively.

Of course that's because it's written by software engineers (I occasionally cross into that) who mostly seem to be incapable of reasoning about anything outside of their domain.
The casual insult aimed at software developers is noted. I'm sure there are numerous retaliatory insults that could be aimed at your field, but I'm not going to bother. (And it should be noted, the original author of Markdown is a writer.)
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I read the article he wrote tonight. Created is probably a better term.
The innovation was taking an informal format that people were already using in online discussions (using *'s around a word/phrase for emphasis and such), and writing a parser/formatter to output that human-readable format into a machine-readable format, so that humans could ultimately benefit from seeing actual typographic formatting applied. I'm not sure "invention" qualifies, but I suspect he may have been able to patent it at the time, if he had gone down the long and expensive road to do so (less groundbreaking "inventions" have gotten patents - our system is kind of broken).
 
  • Like
Reactions: spaxxedout
The innovation was taking an informal format that people were already using in online discussions (using *'s around a word/phrase for emphasis and such), and writing a parser/formatter to output that human-readable format into a machine-readable format, so that humans could ultimately benefit from seeing actual typographic formatting applied. I'm not sure "invention" qualifies, but I suspect he may have been able to patent it at the time, if he had gone down the long and expensive road to do so (less groundbreaking "inventions" have gotten patents - our system is kind of broken).
I think I was using “invention” to highlight the comedy of the situation. I thought his post about it was very grounded, and I admire his humility. It’s quite a poetic story, too. Markdown and NeXT / Apple are great examples of elegant essentialism at its best.
 
You're not listening very carefully, it seems. I get that it doesn't fit for your situation. That doesn't mean that it's ill-suited for everyone else's situation. My whole point was that it's useful in some situations. You started off by disagreeing with that full-stop. Sounds like you want to stamp out Markdown for everyone because it doesn't work well for you.

It's more it's a persistent problem in our 10,000 sized organisation. Using it to store any semi structured information has been a massive cost issue.

The fact that there are parsers for Markdown available for nearly every programming language on the planet would seem to contradict your first statement. And English is also not entirely standardized and has weird extensions all over the place (slang, dialects, specializations), yet we continue to use it quite beneficially to communicate, millions of times a day - would you argue in favor of getting rid of English, because it's not standardized?

That's a terrible straw man. First because parsers exist doesn't mean they are any good. A canonical example is the URL notation

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lord_of_the_Rings_(film_series)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lord_of_the_Rings_(film_series))

The above loves to break things inconsistently above different parsers because the URL contains brackets. Not many people can write good parsers. I know this because I spent years writing good parsers to replace bad ones.

Secondly the other point about English is that it is not a formal grammar from a computer science perspective. And neither are a couple of markdown implementations at least, which appears to be hacked up by amateurs.

(As far as standardization goes, lots of Markdown implementations these days support the CommonMark standard.)

This outlines my fragmentation point.

I have used Markdown numerous times for email messages where I wanted particular formatting, because WYSIWYG editors tend to be sloppy and hard to control - I'll write the Markdown-formatted text in a suitable tool (e.g. Drafts or MacVim, depending on how involved it is), and then copy it out as Rich Text and paste it into Mail, without having to mess around with the target app's WYSIWYG formatting controls.

That's fine but very few humans can or want to do that. I mean as you mention MacVim, I doubt 90% of the people I know can even use that (I can - have been using vim since about 1995). Then there's the moving it around stuff which is something people have trouble with already.

Mail probably should be plain text still (everything went down hill after mutt). That's a whole other conversation though.

As far as structure goes, one of my most common uses for Markdown is writing all manner of notes for myself in Obsidian, which has a very rich system for Wiki-style linking between notes and to specific points in notes. It also supports MathJax and LaTeX for formula writing, for what it's worth, though I don't make use of that, and has a built-in canvas system for drawings, along with a well-regarded extension (Excalidraw) for more elaborate drawing.

All proprietary extensions which are as portable as the weird binary format hiding inside sqlite in notes...

I'm glad to see that we both agree that people should not be trying to write scientific papers in Markdown. Again, it's a tool that has a niche, and scientific papers and such are generally well outside of that niche. Last I checked, LaTeX was still the standard there. You can run Markdown through Pandoc to get at least a start on the equivalent LaTeX document, if someone is foolish enough to try to write such a thing in Markdown.

LaTeX is indeed the standard.

Note taking on paper is downright dangerous - because there is no backup, no easy duplication, no portability, and no search-ability. Lose your notebook and hundreds/thousands of hours worth of notetaking could be gone forever. If you want to make a copy of something for someone, you're what, reduced to standing in front of a copy machine for a while? Or photographing the pages? Or awkwardly scanning the pages of a notebook 1-2 at a time on a flatbed scanner? (And what if there's something else on the page you don't care to share?) And if you leave the notebook in one place, you have zero access to it in another place - if I think of something to look up, or modify, when I'm away from my Mac, I just take out my iPhone, open the Obsidian app and I have complete access to all the same Markdown-formatted notes that are on my Mac, fully synced between the two (and my iPad as well). Similarly, if I want to send someone a note, it's a simple matter of copying and pasting, not scanning pages out of a paper notebook. And I can find anything in thousands of notes in a couple seconds, with a simple search query - paper can't do that, especially if you have a large stack of paper notebooks (and considering that you may be searching because the item you seek was written down in an unexpected place).

I'm not sure where you got sold this ideology about physical notes being dangerous.

Notebooks are where you write ideas and notes. You formulate them into something concrete later which is written up properly, in my case usually in LaTeX. Also notebooks don't go flat when sitting in airports for hours.

Despite the risks, I've not managed to lose a notebook in 50 years (it may happen) and I'm not worried if I do because I've done the above process. As for finding notes, you can index notebooks. It's what we did before we had electronic notebooks. Literally have index at back and contents at front! Taxonomies can be done fine on paper.

If I want to send a note, I usually take a photo of it on my phone and send it on whatsapp.

You're attacking Markdown for not being able to do arbitrary diagrams and such - it's like attacking a car for being a very ineffective submarine - sure, but that doesn't mean cars have no use. Despite this, there are people who employ Obsidian quite effectively for note taking involving diagrams and formulas and such, as it has a wide variety of extensions for these (it's not something I do, but there are people using it quite enthusiastically this way, who are very happy with the results). Something like GoodNotes or Notability, on an iPad, is often much more suitable for quickly taking down information that involves diagrams and formulas and such, and it's way better than paper for all the reasons noted above, primarily backup.

Yeah I have Noteful on my iPad. I occasionally use it for a diagram I wish to sketch by hand and include in LaTeX documents as it can be used to produce vector sketches. But that's about it. Some other colleagues use that or goodnotes for everything.

I will raise the point here about being held hostage by your notebook though. When Goodnotes moved to Goodnotes 5, lots of people had to pay up or get nagged. The same can happen with obsidian, apple notes, noteful, anything. At the end of the day you are left with PDFs if you are lucky. Also all the file formats (apart from some parts of obsidian) are opaque and undocumented. Paper suffers from none of those problems.

Writing completely freehand is far far far better than fiddling around with metaformats on this stuff if it's note taking. I recently wrote up model answers in LaTeX for an exam paper. The exam paper took me about 2 hours to run through on paper. It took me 10 hours to typeset it with LaTeX, which I have about 25 years worth of experience with, and that is considerably more powerful than anything else out there for that domain.

Diagrams would have taken me forever, even in draw.io. On paper, seconds.

As mentioned, I happily use Markdown for composing email responses, when the occasion warrants it, and translate to rich text to paste into email. You make it sound like there is an unpassable wall here - quite the opposite, if it suits you. I have frequently done this in cases where the email I'm composing draws from text that I already have in Markdown format. (I should point out that reply writing also meant on Reddit, where everything is fundamentally Markdown.)

I just use Apple Mail. Less effort. It's about the words not how you structure them.

I use Markdown (mainly in Obsidian but also for a lot of other random notes where it's simply a good convention for adding information) for all manner of small tasks.

I avoid Apple Notes like the plague, because the import/export capabilities are severely lacking, and there's no good interface for working with it from other tools (on my Mac I can easily access all my notes in Obsidian directly from the filesystem using all sorts scripts and tools, plus Obsidian offers thousands of plugins to do all sorts of things, from the mundane to the esoteric) - whatever Apple provides for Notes, that's what you get (and all you get). Also, it suffers from the usual WYSIWYG slop - is that a bold space or a regular space between those words? who knows? - after a bunch of formatting revisions over time, you have only a vague idea of what your text looks like, not what characters and formatting are actually in the file - I much prefer the precision of Markdown (or, frankly, any other text-based markup, but Markdown is simplest) in this situation.

I don't really care too much about the precision. The data is important. Notes is good enough. What goes in it should be considered disposable.

As far as things like checklists go, I use them in Obsidian all the time (it supports that common extension to Markdown), and if I want sorting, a keypress takes me out to MacVim where I can rearrange/transmogrify the text of a Markdown-formatted Obsidian note in any arbitrary way I want (running a section of a file through sort(1) is a common thing to do). Your "not possible in any reasonable form of Markdown" falls flat, plus you're conflating a markup language / file format with an app (Apple Notes) - trying to compare apples and oranges. Oh, and I never write down passwords outside of a password manager.

So markdown doesn't support checklists? 🤣

That's an odd thing to say to a bunch of people who are using it very effectively.

As mentioned before, 10,000 people thinking they are independently using it effectively doesn't necessarily mean that the perspective is the same when observing them from a distance.

Another fine example there is YAML.

The casual insult aimed at software developers is noted. I'm sure there are numerous retaliatory insults that could be aimed at your field, but I'm not going to bother. (And it should be noted, the original author of Markdown is a writer.)

I'm electrical engineering / computer science / mathematics so you're firing at your own toes :)

So what you're really saying is you love Obsidian. If you replaced Markdown with something else you'd still love Obsidian.

Footnote: can you imagine how little progress Roger Penrose would have made with Obsidian

1749288491794.png
 
Last edited:
If that was the case it wouldn't been as ubiquitous as it is. It is useful because of the low bar of entry. It is like the post-it note you tack to the side of your desk just to jot something temporarily, or the napkin at the meeting (and neither are technically good at anything, but the perfect solution in those situations).

People tend to want to create elaborate standards that have all the buzzwords of interoperability and features, but as soon as that happens you require training and support, which is not useful if that is not an option. On the other hand if your workflow is becoming a huge stack of napkins and post-it notes, then maybe it is time to consider if that is actually the route to go.

I will say that the use in GitHub has made a certain defined subset of it a standard, which works very well for the text-documentations in the projects. Another popular venue is Jupyter, which has become huge in scientific programming. The same seems to be carried over to the structured output from most LLM's, and you can enter and get back better formatted text. I do like that the possibility to embed simpler "latex"-style equation, figures and other mathematical structures have become somewhat canonical, because it is so much easier to parse than handwritten scribbles.

Any attempts to create more "advanced" features for markdown, should however be tossed to the bottom of the bottomless pit, we don't need eg. Javascript support to create another HTML standard that is itself already way above its pay-grade. It is not another version of latex and should not have 243561 different packages to render fancy letters.

But back to the topic, i don't think that this will be a way to write with markdown directly into Apple Notes (it is not a plain-text editor and i don't see why Apple would want it to become one), but rather to export in the format and import or paste into your notes something already formatted with markdown.

Ubiquity doesn't necessarily mean good. I mean look at cigarettes.

Don't start me on Jupyter. That's just excrement smeared on top of other excrement. I can go for hours on that. I regularly have a student or two pop up where they've got themselves in a corner with it and everything is broken and nothing works. Have to peel it all out. They should teach them proper composition. I taught my daughter how to use Make, LaTeX, R etc and she had her dissertation wrapped up in a Makefile and versioned in git. It's all forest, no trees now.

Export would be appreciated but I fail to see how this is possible. Markdown is a subset of the functionality i.e. it can't reproduce embedded resources universally. Not can some contextual stuff be represented.

Although in retrospect I'm not sure why we're even discussing this because it could be completely wrong.
 
This thread has really gone off the rails. Good reading when munching on popcorn, methinks.

W/r/t LaTeX, I have a friend who uses that for his general word processing needs, which cracks me up. It's like, Dude, you have the occasional footnote and mathematical equation... LaTeX is overkill.

That said, I've always wanted to "learn" LaTeX, no differently than I've always wanted to learn regex. At least with regex, I've found that ChatGPT does a dam*n fine job coming up with regular expressions that I need in things like Keyboard Maestro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ypl
W/r/t LaTeX, I have a friend who uses that for his general word processing needs, which cracks me up. It's like, Dude, you have the occasional footnote and mathematical equation... LaTeX is overkill.
And he/she's using vim/emacs as text editor I assume?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.