Sorry I just don’t see the point. Why would someone go and buy a speaker if they are looking to buy a router or vice versa? This only makes sense for a customer who is looking for both at the same time. Also, my cable modem is in my basement in a utility closet. Why would I want a high end speaker in there? I could be totally wrong on this, but I don’t see any purpose to going this route.
[doublepost=1515669131][/doublepost]
And yet, somehow, Apple is quite successful. Could it be that ignoring the every whim of every customer is precisely why they are successful? More is not more. Every one of those examples is subjective and understood when looking big picture. The Mac Mini, for example, is using old tech. But every company has a product using older processors. The difference is that Apple released that model with the latest processor at the time whereas most companies would have “updated” using an older processor. That is to say that the Mac Mini is as outdated today as some of the “new” products released recently by other companies. Furthermore, the Mini’s Target market is who? Elementary schools? Grandmothers? Media servers? The Mini is not marketed as a powerhouse, and the chips suitable for it have not made any notable gains, other than power efficiency, which only benefits notebook computers. By not updating, Apple also reduces skus and reduces the number of machines they need to update for firmware and so on. Again, more is not more. You don’t need a Xeon in a machine used for browsing Facebook and word processing.
This would also sound very convincing if I told it to myself before going to sleep at night, but it's still nonsense and there's no excuse for such older hardware. "Other companies do it too"? Isn't this supposed to be Apple, the company of being a class above the rest?