A name is a rose, and it only smells as sweet as you are.
Is the main hard drive icon still named "Macintosh HD"?
Can yall do a collection of "more info" type things like:
- iCal is now Calendar
- Address Book is now Contacts
- Mac OS X is now OS X
- Safari now has omni search
- etc
That link in particular troubles me. More and more I see companies wanting consumers to embrace cloud computing under this notion that it's so much more convenient than having actual possession of the data on your computer.A quote:
"It's going to be a whole lot more iOS," said Gottheil of Mountain Lion, "and shows that the iPhone is basically the gateway drug to all things Apple."
To which I say...very discouraging, if not exactly a surprise.
http://goo.gl/Eg2qE
Safari does not have omni search ( that was a joke I'm guessing )
I really fear the day that the majority of computers ship with NO form of data storage and instead give the companies you bought them from COMPLETE control of the data that used to be stored on a hard drive inside your computer.
I don't like the way they change stuff like that. What was wrong with old names? This will only mess everything up. Oh, I understand - there are loads of potential iOS to Mac halo switchers who might be surprised that Calendar is called iCal. What kind of sorcery is that!? I just hope, they won't rename System prefs to Settings too. Keep the little things the way they are and just add some new useful features and - this is important - improve the overall stability!
No, there IS something dumb about it.
It's the company changing their name just to imply they're no longer the service they orriginally were before.
Take BP for example. They used to be British Petroleum. But with the rising cost of oil, that sort of name can have negative connotations. So they change their name to BP and say their trade is "energy" and change their logo in to a green-energy-friendly-looking sunflower, which is meant to imply that oil production and distribution is just ONE of the MANY things they do as a company... even though the business spends the vast majority of their money on fossil fuels and a comparably tiny percentage on other forms of "energy".
Now, you can be a fanboy and defend these practices as just an improvement over the "cumbersome" ways of the past and claim "no one" calls their Mac operating system "Mac OS X" anymore until the cows come home, but you'll just be sucked in to the consumerism trap these corporations have laid out for you.
Why is iCal and iChat, but Mail and Address Book? This isnt just about consistency between iOS and OS X, but between related apps on OS X. Streamlining, uniformity and consistency are good things. I actually do hope they change System Preferences to Settings.
Long time lurker, finally registered....
Although I am not a fan of the name change, I could see this coming and even Apple hinted at it with Lion, and it only makes sense from a business standpoint.
After 10.5, most of the new features pushed in 10.6, 10.7, and now 10.8, are aimed at blatantly broadcasting the similarities and ease of use between all apple products.
This is likely just a marketing scheme, to continue pushing more people that have only owned apple products in the form of "i" device into purchasing a Macintosh that likely otherwise they would not.
If you have been to an Apple store before 2007, and been to one lately, I don't have to explain the demographic change in apple's customer base....
![]()
The Apple store near me has turned into a Kindergarten at weekends and hence i avoid.
This is where they stop making Mac Pros, but allow OSX to run on selected third party hardware.
Initially, I thought Apple should move the X to be in front of OS (to make it more like iOS,) but then it occurred to me that people would pronounce that as something a little like "exhaust". Not the greatest word to sound like.
Long time lurker, finally registered...
You know, people used to make fun of Windows because of the literally endless software updates and major versions being released. Now we have Apple going through major revisions at almost one a year and I don't doubt they will use that cycle to start removing hardware support for "Macs" at a faster rate, particularly if they combine the iOS and OSX operating systems in name/protocol.
Frankly, I can't keep up. I have thus seen no useful reason to update my MBP to Lion so far (let alone Mountain Lion) other than new software will eventually simply stop supporting older versions of the operating system. I don't care for changing my OS constantly. It tends to result in instability and spending too much time playing around with OS changes instead of getting actual work done.
Throw in the Gatekeeper GARBAGE being introduced in Mountain Lion and I can see that my predictions of Apple eventually wiping out ALL freedom of software installation is definitely slowly coming true. People down-voted me and told me I was full of it, but it IS true. They are definitely trying to turn the entire Mac platform into iOS controlled territory where Apple decides what you CAN and CANNOT run on your home computer. Time to move back to Windows, after all, I see. Apple has become BIG BROTHER (here I was worried about Microsoft all these years).
I have an iPhone and iPad. But because I'm forced to use a Wintel PC at work every day my home computer is Wintel. I wouldn't be surprised at all if Apple is going after all of us who use iOS devices but don't own a Mac. I don't think a desktop OS should be dumbed down to the level of mobile OS but if there was a convergence to get the best of both on each device I'm sure you'd see an increase in sales of Macs. Maybe that's happening already.