Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well, sadly with this patent goes my previous optimistic prediction of Apple pushing the boat out with 3D technology. :( Don't I feel stupid. If this is anything like the Galaxy Gear I think it's fair to say we'll all be extremely disappointed ...

No way. iWatch won't have a touchscreen, it'll have a 3D beamy thing giving a hologram effect like off Star Wars, all which is fully interactive. This means if you need more real-estate or add new features, it's not a problem; one of the main advantages when the iPhone didn't come with a physical keyboard. Otherwise there's no advantage to a small touchscreen; it won't add any functionality to the ecosystem. It won't be as good as an iPhone/iPad for browsing, making calls, or anything else. It'll be redundant.

My money's firmly on Apple popping in some technology 5-10 years ahead of their competitors' pipelines. If they perfect it they could easily have it running in tandem with an iPhone to make calls (much like OS X 10.10 will), without the limitations of the Galaxy Gear (crappy sluggish interface and tiny screen).

Image
 
A black bar :p

moto-360-customization-2.jpg


moto-360-3.png


android-wear-moto-360-close-up-578-80.jpg

Fine. But I still think it is a waste of screen display, because to display the same amount of information as a square screen it would need to be almost double the size. A double sized wouldn't look as good, so the screen text will probably get scaled down, which then older users or users with bad eyes won't be able to use too well.

Either way I do like circle better, it looks less like a my lightning mcqueen watch from when I was a kid. But just I think there can be some problems with it, like imagine your Mac screen being a circle just how much would be cut off, right?
 
When was that patent application filed? Perusing Amazon's selection of smart watches showes devices that have been around for 3-4 years with most of the features listed in that patent.
 
But just I think there can be some problems with it, like imagine your Mac screen being a circle just how much would be cut off, right?

You are thinking as if they are going to try and jam a square interface into a round screen.

If you design to the strengths of your display, you can make something elegant and beautiful (and probably very functional) on any shape display.

Use the circumference with text and notifications that scrolls along the curves... maybe have the green color of your being on a voice or video thing on your phone push in from the outside... there are options here.
 
You are thinking as if they are going to try and jam a square interface into a round screen.

If you design to the strengths of your display, you can make something elegant and beautiful (and probably very functional) on any shape display.

Use the circumference with text and notifications that scrolls along the curves... maybe have the green color of your being on a voice or video thing on your phone push in from the outside... there are options here.

You are right, I see how it could look good. Especially if its Apple :)
 
Moto 360 is quite thick and big. I can't imagine a woman wearing it. Certainly not anyone with tiny wrists.

Most reviewers that have worn the Moto 360 say it's not as big and thick as it looks and that it is comfortable to wear. They have worn both the circular 360 and the square Android Wear watches and said the circular design makes it much more comfortable.
 
When was that patent application filed? Perusing Amazon's selection of smart watches showes devices that have been around for 3-4 years with most of the features listed in that patent.

Link one. I can't find one.

And to answer your question, January 2011.
 
Moto 360 is quite thick and big. I can't imagine a woman wearing it. Certainly not anyone with tiny wrists.

I still think smart watches are a solution looking for a problem. It's the tech world trying to find "the next big thing" and looking for growth since smartphones and tablets are starting to become more mature and growth is slowing.

yeah, i agree. I like the idea behind them

But so far, I've yet to see anything that gets it.

A smart watch shouldn't be a replacement for your phone for mobile. Trying to cram everything into a wristworn device is just too much. it doesn't need to replicate everything you do on the phone. Thats why we have a phone.

What I want, is a piece of modern jewellery. a sleek, sexy looking device. I'm a watch wearer (everyday). But I'm not a high end watch wearer. But even what we've seen just looks like crap. Granted, First gen devices tend to do that.

I want a smart watch that looks 100% like a normal everyday watch. And then just deliver notifications and summary details. At that point, should i choose I want to do more, I would pull out my phone.
 
Not sure if I'm happy or not about a modular device. More often than not they cost more to put together than if it was a fully manufactured for you.
But having the ability to update your watch for the situation sounds cool. Out for a run just add gps band. Swim? Add your stroke counter. On holiday add your 'big battery band'
 
Still not convinced this smart watch thing is ever going to happen. Pointless and trivial use of technology.
 
Apple also describes a method of connecting the smartwatch to a mobile device that allows for the display of incoming calls, text messages and other alerts on the wrist-worn display. In another embodiment, the device can alert the user when it is out of range and thus at risk of being lost or stolen. The patent also contains provisions for movement-based controls of the wristwatch device.

So it's still not a standalone smartwatch? You still need a smartphone to make/receive calls/texts?
 
Do these patents ever see the light of day.

I would most do in Jon Ive's lab. But quite a few of them make it into released products.

----------

Still not convinced this smart watch thing is ever going to happen. Pointless and trivial use of technology.

You could say the same thing of smartphones and tablets 10-15 years ago but now they are huge. The watch if done right will make the iPod shuffle obsolete and possibly the nano obsolete too.

----------

iTime. Interesting name.

The iTime an item sold by iTim (TC).
 
How does a circular display provide a better user experience?
By pleasing the users eye and not immediately marking him (or her) as a hopeless casio-calculator-watch-loving-meganerd ;-)


Thinking about it...IF the iWatch is happening and IF it would be round...that would finaly be a valid reason why contact / favorites pictures are round in iOS 7 (despite the rectangular screen :D)
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
http://www.amazon.com/LeexGroup®New...-Blackberry/dp/B00JKDQ0N4/ref=cm_cr_pr_sims_t

Then go down the "customers also viewed" trail which can last hours of your life. I remember looking at similar when I left my last residence, which was December 2010.

Here is another with reviews to early 2011
http://www.amazon.com/Quadband-Voice-Dialing-Watch-Unlocked/dp/B004CWCHP8/ref=cm_cr_pr_pb_t

Could you show me how those watches are modular in any sense of the word?
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
No black bar in these mockups

Image

Image

Of course, they're only mockups; but as you can see, the software looks dramatically different and still usable than the Android stuff. But at the end of the day, typically whatever Apple releases turns out to be awesome anyway, so a rectangular screen wouldn't phase me.

Right, but like you said, those are complete mockups with no basis. At least those moto renders are nearly identical to the actual product.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.