In the US Market. They have better market exposure by being available on more networks.
Do the math.
5+ Android Phones X number of carriers
1 iPhone X number of carriers
So, why Android has grew like it has grew in Europe?
In the US Market. They have better market exposure by being available on more networks.
Do the math.
5+ Android Phones X number of carriers
1 iPhone X number of carriers
Then the next buying decision would be what carrier can I use for this phone. Still, if you take any of these best selling Android phones individually they will not have as many sales as the iPhone has.
And the counter argument is that Apple are selling as many iPhone 4 as they are because that they only got one recent model. (BTW, is the AT&T iPhone 4 the same as the Verizon iPhone 4 and the White iPhone 4?)
Their views differ, it's as simple as that.
Apple believe that just having one recent model of the iPhone is the way to do it. HTC, Motorola, Samsung, etc believe that having more recent phones is the way to do it.
Yeah but that wasnt my point at all. Nice try. I just think its extremely naive to think that a majority of the Android base is made up of misguided, budget shoppers.
That's what you assumed I was speaking of. This whole conversation has to deal with market share. There are many different factors that affect a buyers decision and Android seems to win over on the majority of them because they have the better market exposure.
But why would people buy a Nokia Windows phone? Nokia used to sell Symbian phones, and for many years (until around 2007) they were the best you could buy. Plenty of people kept buying them, although in shrinking numbers, when better phones became available. But now there are no Symbian phones anymore. Since all these Nokia customers have to switch to something different, why would they switch to a Windows phone? Most of them use Windows at work, they know how bad it is, and they wouldn't want it in their private life if they got paid. The huge majority of these people will switch to iPhone or Android.
- People who don't know better and just want a cheap phone
- A few die-hard Microsoft fanboys
RIM is losing the enterprise market. Haven't you seen the news articles talking about that trend? The big Wall Street banks are moving away from RIM and toward iPhones. It's not a trend that is good for RIM.
And RIM did court the consumer market, which is why you see so many teen girls with Blackberrys so that they can text for free. Didn't help RIM in the long run though.
Apple is first in my book. They make their own hardware and software unlike all these Android devices from many different companies taking refuge under just one name..
-People who wants a Nokia phone because of the hardware
-WP7 has nothing to do with desktop Windows
That's exactly what I am saying. Android will always have the better market exposure. Apple will have the better profit. If Android ever loses in the market share war then they should be ashamed of themselves. That's like Windows losing its Computer OS Market share to Apple.
But why would people buy a Nokia Windows phone? Nokia used to sell Symbian phones, and for many years (until around 2007) they were the best you could buy. Plenty of people kept buying them, although in shrinking numbers, when better phones became available.
Sounds like a resounding win for Android. Google increase in marketshare was 400% greater than was the increase for Apple.
iPhone never destroyed Nokia, it didn't even come close to touching it. WTF are you talking about?
... Just so your 12 year old mind knows, ...
Interestingly that is the same percentage that malware increased on the Android OS.
Phone manufacturers are platform agnostic. They couldn't care less what their phones run as long as they are making money. Android depends on such companies, and that's not a very firm foundation.
??
If you find any real number, please, show them